Author Topic: Where were Jez and Gerry standing when they did their talking? Ideas solutions  (Read 102528 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

They would have to be arrested and interviewed under caution in this country wouldn’t you think?  As would the person being pointed at.  I don’t think such a development would go unreported in this or any other country do you?

You wouldn't be arrested unless there were sufficient grounds to do so.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

You wouldn't be arrested unless there were sufficient grounds to do so.
I would think one or more of the Tapas group breaking ranks and “spilling the beans” would be sufficient grounds for arrest.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

I would think one or more of the Tapas group breaking ranks and “spilling the beans” would be sufficient grounds for arrest.

Could well be, but it would depend on whether or not they have been given immunity.
As no one  involvedhas uttered a word about it, the point is moot.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Could well be, but it would depend on whether or not they have been given immunity.
As no one  involvedhas uttered a word about it, the point is moot.
Immunity or not, whoever they were accusing would almost certainly be arrested and questioned under caution.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline ShiningInLuz

What's up, old man?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Immunity or not, whoever they were accusing would almost certainly be arrested and questioned under caution.

Who would know anyway?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Who would know anyway?
I think if a McCann were arrested and questioned under caution we would all know.  Any reason why we would not?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

I think if a McCann were arrested and questioned under caution we would all know.  Any reason why we would not?

Any reason why we would ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline jassi

I think if a McCann were arrested and questioned under caution we would all know.  Any reason why we would not?

I thought we were talking about a stool pigeon
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline ShiningInLuz

What's up, old man?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

It's in the link.
There is no relevant information in your link IMO.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Any reason why we would ?
It would be an explosive news story and why wouldn’t we?  We heard about the arguidos in Portugal.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline ShiningInLuz

There is no relevant information in your link IMO.
Then once again we have a difference of opinion.   (&^&
What's up, old man?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Then once again we have a difference of opinion.   (&^&
yup.  Personally I don’t think the combined forces of the Met and the PJ would be spending in excess of £12m on this investigation if the case could never come to trial owing to some statute of limitations law.  No doubt you think the opposite.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".