Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?

[Mr Gray]

What about the lies the press and others have told...

100% match to maddies DNA

These lies are much more significant

[Mr Gray]

this thread is conscerned with lies told by the bbc

i therefore think that all lies told are relevant..

why no criticism of lies such as..

dogs alerted to cadaver odour in 5a and teh car

!00% match to maddies dna

i am not looking to discuss these points just the fact that other lies have been told and not rescinded. This thread neeeds to be seen in context..

I have copied this post and will send to John if it is removed again...it is on topic and relevant...please stop the censorship

[Lace]

Well is that all she has to come up with?   

Martin Smith said he was 60-80% sure it was Gerry he saw,  going by the way HE CARRIED HIS CHILD OFF THE PLANE!!    Oh come on,   for gods sake that is ridiculous.

So he says he never changed his mind,   ok,    so the papers got it wrong,   it doesn't change the fact that he didn't say it was Gerry he saw by identifying him by his looks it was by the way he carried his child off the plane,  which is the way thousands of people carry their child.

So sorry,   it means absolutely nothing.

[Mr Gray]

Well is that all she has to come up with?   

Martin Smith said he was 60-80% sure it was Gerry he saw,  going by the way HE CARRIED HIS CHILD OFF THE PLANE!!    Oh come on,   for gods sake that is ridiculous.

So he says he never changed his mind,   ok,    so the papers got it wrong,   it doesn't change the fact that he didn't say it was Gerry he saw by identifying him by his looks it was by the way he carried his child off the plane,  which is the way thousands of people carry their child.

So sorry,   it means absolutely nothing.

It means absolutely nothing and pales into significance when compared to other lies told

[jassi]

Well is that all she has to come up with?   

Martin Smith said he was 60-80% sure it was Gerry he saw,  going by the way HE CARRIED HIS CHILD OFF THE PLANE!!    Oh come on,   for gods sake that is ridiculous.

So he says he never changed his mind,   ok,    so the papers got it wrong,   it doesn't change the fact that he didn't say it was Gerry he saw by identifying him by his looks it was by the way he carried his child off the plane,  which is the way thousands of people carry their child.

So sorry,  it means absolutely nothing.

Fine, so forget about it.

[barrier]

Well is that all she has to come up with?   

Martin Smith said he was 60-80% sure it was Gerry he saw,  going by the way HE CARRIED HIS CHILD OFF THE PLANE!!    Oh come on,   for gods sake that is ridiculous.

So he says he never changed his mind,   ok,    so the papers got it wrong,   it doesn't change the fact that he didn't say it was Gerry he saw by identifying him by his looks it was by the way he carried his child off the plane,  which is the way thousands of people carry their child.

So sorry,   it means absolutely nothing.

Thousands of others may well do,but its likely GM was the only one out of those thousands who was in Luz at the time,so it may mean something.

[Mr Gray]

Thousands of others may well do,but its likely GM was the only one out of those thousands who was in Luz at the time,so it may mean something.

not according to the portuguese and SY investigation. Smiths identification seems extremely weak imo

[barrier]

not according to the portuguese and SY investigation. Smiths identification seems extremely weak imo

It was good enough for Redwood to change the timeline.Smithman is known IMO,there is nothing on the MET site pertaining to any appeals for info.

[jassi]

It was good enough for Redwood to change the timeline.Smithman is known IMO,there is nothing on the MET site pertaining to any appeals for info.

Probably because they've got tired of people ringing in and identifying him as Gerry   

[Eleanor]

Thousands of others may well do,but its likely GM was the only one out of those thousands who was in Luz at the time,so it may mean something.

It is very Unlikely that Gerry was the only one in PdL at the time.  How else does one carry a sleeping child?

[barrier]

It is very Unlikely that Gerry was the only one in PdL at the time.  How else does one carry a sleeping child?

Mr Smith isn't quoted as saying he was 60/80% sure it was any one of the thousands of others is he?

[Wonderfulspam]

It is very Unlikely that Gerry was the only one in PdL at the time.  How else does one carry a sleeping child?

In a buggy.

[Eleanor]

Mr Smith isn't quoted as saying he was 60/80% sure it was any one of the thousands of others is he?

He just didn't see Smithman's face.  So who was it?

[Wonderfulspam]

He just didn't see Smithman's face.  So who was it?

He must have, since he knew he wasn't wearing glasses or had a beard.

[barrier]

He just didn't see Smithman's face.  So who was it?

I wasn't there,so I don't try to second guess,as far as I am concerned I've read an article where its quoted that Mr Smith is/was 60%/80% certain of who he saw.