The Smithman e-fits

[ShiningInLuz]

Nice recovery Carana "Anyway... to get back on topic, I find this link from Alice particularly interesting:
https://www.surrey.police.uk/policies-and-procedures/e-fit-procedure/"

Well can you comment on the link?

I cannot find Alice's original post on this, which is a shame, because the document has lots of food for thought with regard to the Smithman e-fits.

I need to read it 2 or 3 times more, but it appears to illustrate the Smithman and Tannerman sightings perfectly.

A gem of a source.  Many thanks, Alice.

[Mr Gray]

I cannot find Alice's original post on this, which is a shame, because the document has lots of food for thought with regard to the Smithman e-fits.

I need to read it 2 or 3 times more, but it appears to illustrate the Smithman and Tannerman sightings perfectly.

A gem of a source.  Many thanks, Alice.

There is no food for thought... Smith claimed the person he daw based on how the child was carried.. Not on his face... End of

[Robittybob1]

There is no food for thought... Smith claimed the person he daw based on how the child was carried.. Not on his face... End of

That is not evidenced in the file.  You have made that mistake because there is not statement taken or at least available at the time of doing the E-fit, so we don't know what it is he is drawing/composing.

[Brietta]

That is not evidenced in the file.  You have made that mistake because there is not statement taken or at least available at the time of doing the E-fit, so we don't know what it is he is drawing/composing.

The private detectives would in my opinion have taken notes if not recordings at the time the efits were constructed; that information would have been passed to Operation Grange when the efits were.
So although we may know nothing, the folk who matter do.

[ShiningInLuz]

There is no food for thought... Smith claimed the person he daw based on how the child was carried.. Not on his face... End of

I would rank this post as priceless i.e. without price. 

[Alice Purjorick]

I cannot find Alice's original post on this, which is a shame, because the document has lots of food for thought with regard to the Smithman e-fits.

I need to read it 2 or 3 times more, but it appears to illustrate the Smithman and Tannerman sightings perfectly.

A gem of a source.  Many thanks, Alice.

Here you go then:

A bit of L.B.T.R for one and all:
Read thoroughly inwardly digest and then form an opinion.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253831/pace-code-d-2011.pdf
http://library.college.police.uk/docs/acpo/facial-identification-guidance-2009.pdf
https://www.surrey.police.uk/policies-and-procedures/e-fit-procedure/

Note

There are over 100 pages all together. I'd read a bit more than the cover sheets before saddling up [were I you  ]

[Brietta]

I would rank this post as priceless i.e. without price.

Priceless?  Martin Smith's identification was based on posture as far as I recall.

[Brietta]

Here you go then:

A bit of L.B.T.R for one and all:
Read thoroughly inwardly digest and then form an opinion.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253831/pace-code-d-2011.pdf
http://library.college.police.uk/docs/acpo/facial-identification-guidance-2009.pdf
https://www.surrey.police.uk/policies-and-procedures/e-fit-procedure/

Note

There are over 100 pages all together. I'd read a bit more than the cover sheets before saddling up [were I you  ]

Alice ... was your original post deleted?

[ShiningInLuz]

Priceless?  Martin Smith's identification was based on posture as far as I recall.

That would mean you are the second person who has either not read the document or simply not understood its importance.

Alice has set me some homework.  I'll get back to you when I can.   

[Alice Purjorick]

Alice ... was your original post deleted?

No!
SiL said she couldn't find it so I just reposted it being a helpful chappie 'n' all that, in full cognizance it trangresses forum rules. But having always tested high in insubordination and maverick tendencies I can't say I care much......


 

[Brietta]

No!
SiL said she couldn't find it so I just reposted it being a helpful chappie 'n' all that, in full cognizance it trangresses forum rules. But having always tested high in insubordination and maverick tendencies I can't say I care much......

That's fine, thank you.
As you are obviously aware if you feel a post has been unfairly removed it is against forum rules for you to reinstate it, John or one of the senior mods will make that decision.
Just makes for the smooth operation of the forum, which is why I was checking with you.

[Alice Purjorick]

That's fine, thank you.
As you are obviously aware if you feel a post has been unfairly removed it is against forum rules for you to reinstate it, John or one of the senior mods will make that decision.
Just makes for the smooth operation of the forum, which is why I was checking with you.

No problem.
I am not precious about having my posts whooshed anyway. Some of them are fit for little else....

[misty]

No problem.
I am not precious about having my posts whooshed anyway. Some of them are fit for little else....

The original post was on another thread & has not been whooshed.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9195.msg448626#msg448626

[Alice Purjorick]

The original post was on another thread & has not been whooshed.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9195.msg448626#msg448626

I thought I already said it had not been deleted?
I know I am bleedin' clever but even I can't cut and paste from a post that isn't there.......

[misty]

I thought I already said it had not been deleted?
I know I am bleedin' clever but even I can't cut and paste from a post that isn't there.......

What - you mean you don't type all your posts on Word first, take a screenshot as back-up then keep copies on a memory stick?