Author Topic: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence  (Read 179317 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #60 on: March 04, 2018, 10:22:59 AM »
Using that criteria, how many deaths does logic dictate occurred in Haute de la Garrenne?  Eddie's trained response was to bark ... how often did he 'alert' in the exclusive footage shown below?
Exclusive footage of 'Eddie'- Cadaver Dog at Haut de la Garenne
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MczCU66raBE

Didn’t Eddie alert to dried blood ? If a blood dog hadn’t also screened the area isn’t it possible that Eddie was alerting to blood ? Fortunately Keela also searched 5a and didn’t alert in the bedroom so we can rule dried blood out in that instance.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #61 on: March 04, 2018, 10:26:59 AM »
Show me the colaborating evidence Faith.

You cant, because there isn't any.

You claimed Tamsin Silence’s grandad’s ashes/clothes caused Eddie to alert yet have posted no proof that her grandfather even died in Portugal never mind that his ashes/clothes were stored in 5a. So as per forum etiquette either provide a cite or withdraw your misleading posts.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #62 on: March 04, 2018, 10:41:17 AM »
You claimed Tamsin Silence’s grandad’s ashes/clothes caused Eddie to alert yet have posted no proof that her grandfather even died in Portugal never mind that his ashes/clothes were stored in 5a. So as per forum etiquette either provide a cite or withdraw your misleading posts.
Sadie only said "could have been".  "Could have been to the scent of Tasmin's Grandpas ashes ...."
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #63 on: March 04, 2018, 10:43:27 AM »
Sadie only said "could have been".  "Could have been to the scent of Tasmin's Grandpas ashes ...."


Could have been is suggestive of,either they were in 5a or they were not.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #64 on: March 04, 2018, 10:46:00 AM »

Could have been is suggestive of,either they were in 5a or they were not.
Could have been therefore no need for a cite.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #65 on: March 04, 2018, 10:46:30 AM »
Could have been therefore no need for a cite.

Easy get out.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #66 on: March 04, 2018, 10:50:36 AM »
Sadie only said "could have been".  "Could have been to the scent of Tasmin's Grandpas ashes ...."

When you have to have a number of independent assumptions for a theory to work it tends towards speculation, which is frowned on here.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #67 on: March 04, 2018, 10:52:54 AM »
When you have to have a number of independent assumptions for a theory to work it tends towards speculation, which is frowned on here.

so we need to stick to facts...no confirmation of cadaver odour according to the experts

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #68 on: March 04, 2018, 10:53:32 AM »
so we need to stick to facts...no confirmation of cadaver odour according to the experts

The dog alerted.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #69 on: March 04, 2018, 10:57:19 AM »
Easy get out.
It is the way it is done around here.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Lace

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #70 on: March 04, 2018, 11:14:53 AM »
Dogs read window stickers!

Martin Grime knew the car was the one the McCann's were using,  Martin Grimes knew 5a was the apartment that the McCann's stayed in.    In my opinion Eddie spent a lot more time being called back to the McCann's car and apartment.    With regards to the apartment,   Eddie would have sniffed about the bedroom of 5a and left as he did the other apartments,  but Martin Grimes called him back numerous times.    In my opinion Eddie either barked just to please Martin Grimes or he barked because he could smell something that may be remotely connected to the smell he was supposed to alert to,  something that was once in the bedroom and been taken away, such as stained clothing or something that had been walked in from the outside.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #71 on: March 04, 2018, 11:18:01 AM »
Martin Grime knew the car was the one the McCann's were using,  Martin Grimes knew 5a was the apartment that the McCann's stayed in.    In my opinion Eddie spent a lot more time being called back to the McCann's car and apartment.    With regards to the apartment,   Eddie would have sniffed about the bedroom of 5a and left as he did the other apartments,  but Martin Grimes called him back numerous times.    In my opinion Eddie either barked just to please Martin Grimes or he barked because he could smell something that may be remotely connected to the smell he was supposed to alert to,  something that was once in the bedroom and been taken away, such as stained clothing or something that had been walked in from the outside.
True, it seemed to be inconsistent really, and I have made note of this previously.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #72 on: March 04, 2018, 11:21:13 AM »
Martin Grime knew the car was the one the McCann's were using,  Martin Grimes knew 5a was the apartment that the McCann's stayed in.    In my opinion Eddie spent a lot more time being called back to the McCann's car and apartment.    With regards to the apartment,   Eddie would have sniffed about the bedroom of 5a and left as he did the other apartments,  but Martin Grimes called him back numerous times.    In my opinion Eddie either barked just to please Martin Grimes or he barked because he could smell something that may be remotely connected to the smell he was supposed to alert to,  something that was once in the bedroom and been taken away, such as stained clothing or something that had been walked in from the outside.

‘Suggestive of cadaver contaminant’.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Lace

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #73 on: March 04, 2018, 11:28:44 AM »
‘Suggestive of cadaver contaminant’.

Of course that was said,  but Eddie alerts to blood of a living person,   washing could have had blood on them and been removed and scent was still there.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #74 on: March 04, 2018, 11:30:00 AM »
Of course that was said,  but Eddie alerts to blood of a living person,   washing could have had blood on them and been removed and scent was still there.

Keela didn’t alert so not blood.

Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?