Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence

[Mr Gray]

That is one way of looking at it.  I was interested to see how Davel interpreted those words?

Im not interreting anything...that would be opinion...Im taking the words at face value.

grime has not sated its his opinion the dogs alerted to cadaver...hes said its possible...you cant seem to see the difernece which questions your ability to analyse the evidence...imo

[misty]

I take it as more of a standard police evidence approach. Unless they can be 100% certain they will qualify their statements. It doesn’t mean the dog was not always correct.

On camera, Grime said that when Keela alerted, blood was always found, ergo he had 100% confidence in her alerts. Why didn't he have the same confidence when referring to Eddie's alerts?

[Robittybob1]

Im not interreting anything...that would be opinion...Im taking the words at face value.

grime has not sated its his opinion the dogs alerted to cadaver...hes said its possible...you cant seem to see the difernece which questions your ability to analyse the evidence...imo

If it was only possible cadaver odour what other possibilities are there?

[Mr Gray]

I take it as more of a standard police evidence approach. Unless they can be 100% certain they will qualify their statements. It doesn’t mean the dog was not always correct.

grime could have said in his opinion the dog alerted to cadaver...he didnt..and he went even further by saying the alerts had no evidential reliability... as did harrison...it doesnt mean the dog wasnt always correct and it doesnt mean the dog was always correct...it means no one knows

[Mr Gray]

If it was only possible cadaver odour what other possibilities are there?

ask grime

[Robittybob1]

ask grime

OK let's ask him.

[Mr Gray]

OK let's ask him.

how do you propose to do that and what makes you think he would answer...its an ongoing case...you expect to \ask an important witness questions

[Robittybob1]

how do you propose to do that and what makes you think he would answer...its an ongoing case...you expect to \ask an important witness questions

I'll get you to do that!  The case could be shut down next month.  Must be getting close to the end now.

[misty]

I'll get you to do that!  The case could be shut down next month.  Must be getting close to the end now.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=83.0

He's also been subjected to the alleged D-Notice.

[Alice Purjorick]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=83.0

He's also been subjected to the alleged D-Notice.

Jeez is this a matter of National Security then?

[Alice Purjorick]

Its gunit who has quoted gime incorrectly...perhaps all the files are innaccurate and its a total dogs dinner...could be

what of course really matters is the mccanns ...according to both investiagtions are not suspects

A pretyy inept bodyswerve if I may say so sir!
The post I responded to was all your own work and nothing to do with G-Unit or whether indeed the McCanns are or are not suspects.

[misty]

Jeez is this a matter of National Security then?

I was (un)reliably informed 'twas so, when I first stumbled upon t'internet chat.

[Mr Gray]

A pretyy inept bodyswerve if I may say so sir!
The post I responded to was all your own work and nothing to do with G-Unit or whether indeed the McCanns are or are not suspects.

I think I would settle for the mcCanns being arrested tomorrow because at least it would end all this pointless debate

[Alice Purjorick]

I was (un)reliably informed 'twas so, when I first stumbled upon t'internet chat.

Blimey! you mean like Burgess, MaClean and the Krogers? and even like what's going on "up the road" from me as we speak ? Watch out for bold Bulgars with umbrellas.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The weight of those alerts as evidence.

That doesn't answer my question but thanks anyway.