Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence

[G-Unit]

You need to read all the quotes made by Grime and Harrison.... They both specifically refer to physical evidence..
Again it seems, there is something  you are unaware  of

After the conclusion of the searches, a meeting in the Portimao offices of the PJ took place in the cabinet of Goncalo AMARAL and those present included Guilermino ENCARNACO, an official representative from the Leicestershire police, Martin GRIME and myself. During the meeting were exhibited videos with the details of search activities including the sniffer dogs lead by Martin GRIME. GRIME commented on the actions of the dogs and added that no confirmed evidence or information could be taken from the alerts by the dogs but needed to be confirmed with physical evidence.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARK_HARRISON-RIGATORY.htm

then from grime..

Once the alert has been given by the dog, it is up to the investigator/forensic scientist to locate, identify and scientifically provide the evidence of DNA, etc.

http://mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

There was none in the Gilroy case, just corroborting evidence.

[Mr Gray]

There was none in the Gilroy case, just corroborting evidence.

And what do you imagine that proves... There is evidence that that the dog evidence was considered unreliable

[Brietta]

There was none in the Gilroy case, just corroborting evidence.

Sorry, I'm not picking up on your meaning.

[Alice Purjorick]

You quote Robbie Coltrane and I will quote martin grime

I'll see your Martin Grime and raise a John Coltrane.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcN5LP4WLAA

[Mr Gray]

I'll see your Martin Grime and raise a John Coltrane.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcN5LP4WLAA

strange choice..Coltrane payed cracker ...the criminal profiler....as used in the Colin Stagg case and we know what use that was.

[Mr Gray]

There was none in the Gilroy case, just corroborting evidence.

so the alerts were not corroborated.. I emailed the SCCRC re the case and have been told my request is being dealt with as a FOI reuqest...so at least I will get some response

[Mr Gray]

There was none in the Gilroy case, just corroborting evidence.

once again you are making assunptions...who says the alerts were corroborated...another pointer tha you do not understand the evidence...it may well be the alerts ahve been discredited

[Angelo222]

once again you are making assunptions...who says the alerts were corroborated...another pointer tha you do not understand the evidence...it may well be the alerts ahve been discredited

Not according to Grime they haven't.

[Mr Gray]

Not according to Grime they haven't.

I'm talking about the Gilroy case... Grime does not support the alerts as evidence in the McCann case..

[Angelo222]

I'm talking about the Gilroy case... Grime does not support the alerts as evidence in the McCann case..

Not officially but he believes Ediie did alert to cadaver scent.

[Mr Gray]

Not officially but he believes Ediie did alert to cadaver scent.

Cite... You can't give a cite so is just an unsubstantiated  claim

[Angelo222]

Cite

I'm afraid I can't post a cite but I do know he believed in Eddie and that he genuinely alerted in accordance with his training regimes.

[Mr Gray]

I'm afraid I can't post a cite but I do know he believed in Eddie and that he genuinely alerted in accordance with his training regimes.

So now it's not cadaver scent but training regime which include blood... That's why you need a cite

[Angelo222]

So now it's not cadaver scent but training regime which include blood... That's why you need a cite

But his training regimes included cadaver scent.

[Mr Gray]

But his training regimes included cadaver scent.

And blood.. Theres, confusion already...