« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 103   Go Down

Author Topic: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence  (Read 151738 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #960 on: March 19, 2018, 04:47:54 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on March 19, 2018, 04:44:23 PM
I have pointed out several times in my analysis there is no alert at all on Cuddle Cat. 

It is good to see the overseeing body expressed doubts about that too...so they expressed doubts about other alerts too

Again you are stating your opinion as fact... Grime said there was an alert to CC... so you are contradicting him
The point of my post is that according to the pj Eddie did not react to other sites originally...before eventually  alerting...
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #961 on: March 19, 2018, 04:50:45 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on March 19, 2018, 04:31:25 PM
I want you to show me what the source of this sentence is "What is, surprising is, the, fact that the, dog trained, to react to cadaver on most occasions, originally didn't react to it... As in cuddle cat... Those, aren't my words, but the, words, of the, pj and, are in the, files"?
Where in the files?
That is the third time you have resisted finding a requested cite, I will delete your posts without cites in the future.

As your post is making an unfair and incorrect accusation against me could you alter this one too
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #962 on: March 19, 2018, 04:55:10 PM »
Quote from: Davel on March 19, 2018, 04:34:29 PM
Now who is clearly confused.. Post 952 this morning

You need to read the posts before making such a fool of yourself

Most posters have seen this several times before... It's in the files... And I've posted the cite many times
That analysis report - who do you think wrote it? 
"ANALYSIS REPORT OF THE FIRST 11 VOLUMES OF THE INQUIRY (pages 1-3004) Central Department of Criminal Investigation, February, 5th, 2008"  Is the "Central Department of Criminal Investigation" part of the PJ?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #963 on: March 19, 2018, 05:05:30 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on March 19, 2018, 04:55:10 PM
That analysis report - who do you think wrote it? 
"ANALYSIS REPORT OF THE FIRST 11 VOLUMES OF THE INQUIRY (pages 1-3004) Central Department of Criminal Investigation, February, 5th, 2008"  Is the "Central Department of Criminal Investigation" part of the PJ?

I know who wrote it.. Do you
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #964 on: March 19, 2018, 05:30:22 PM »
Quote from: Davel on March 19, 2018, 05:05:30 PM
I know who wrote it.. Do you
Can you answer my question please?   It is certainly written by the Portuguese, but is the CID part of the PJ or above it?  The report makes requests for clarifications so it appears to me to be a higher authority than the PJ.

Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #965 on: March 19, 2018, 05:33:36 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on March 19, 2018, 05:30:22 PM
Can you answer my question please?   It is certainly written by the Portuguese, but is the CID part of the PJ or above it?  The report makes requests for clarifications so it appears to me to be a higher authority than the PJ.
If you look at the link provided your question will be answerred
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #966 on: March 19, 2018, 05:39:09 PM »
Quote from: Davel on March 19, 2018, 05:33:36 PM
If you look at the link provided your question will be answerred
Can you answer my original question please?  That analysis report - who do you think wrote it?  And what is the relationship to the PJ?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #967 on: March 19, 2018, 05:45:40 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on March 19, 2018, 05:39:09 PM
Can you answer my original question please?  That analysis report - who do you think wrote it?  And what is the relationship to the PJ?

Have you not looked at the report... It tells you who wrote it..
Stop badgering me for simple information that is on the cite I have provided
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #968 on: March 19, 2018, 05:49:09 PM »
Quote from: Davel on March 19, 2018, 05:45:40 PM
Have you not looked at the report... It tells you who wrote it..
Stop badgering me for simple information that is on the cite I have provided
Is that part of the report or just a translators note?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #969 on: March 19, 2018, 05:51:30 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on March 19, 2018, 05:49:09 PM
Is that part of the report or just a translators note?
I'll leave you to make your own mind up
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #970 on: March 19, 2018, 05:55:04 PM »
Quote from: Davel on March 19, 2018, 05:51:30 PM
I'll leave you to make your own mind up
I take it that this part is a translator note "TRANSLATION BY LUZ

*12-11  OUTROS APENSOS FILE 12: 11 VOLUMES - Pages 1a to 1s
This file, 113 pages in total, has no written page numbers. It consists of a detailed analysis/report of the First 11 volumes of the investigation (pages 1 to 3004) re the mobile phone antennas activated and other calls made during the period under investigation. It includes the detailed chart (diagrammatic) created by the PJ re phone calls made by the Tapas 9 and others.
 

NOTE:
This is the second report demanded to a team of independent analysts from the Central Department of Criminal Investigation (Central Division of Information Analysis - PJ), dated from February 2008.
The references to the annexes and pages of the files were kept, just in order to allow anyone to ask for some particular document(s) to be translated ' I would do them ALL if I had the time, but I fear I won't be able to, so I'll be happy to go over those that you consider more interesting, if the request is rationally founded."

Is that how you read it?

If that is true then "(Central Division of Information Analysis - PJ)" is not actually a verified fact but a note.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2018, 05:59:01 PM by Robittybob1 »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #971 on: March 19, 2018, 06:01:59 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on March 19, 2018, 05:55:04 PM
I take it that this part is a translator note "TRANSLATION BY LUZ

*12-11  OUTROS APENSOS FILE 12: 11 VOLUMES - Pages 1a to 1s
This file, 113 pages in total, has no written page numbers. It consists of a detailed analysis/report of the First 11 volumes of the investigation (pages 1 to 3004) re the mobile phone antennas activated and other calls made during the period under investigation. It includes the detailed chart (diagrammatic) created by the PJ re phone calls made by the Tapas 9 and others.
 

NOTE:
This is the second report demanded to a team of independent analysts from the Central Department of Criminal Investigation (Central Division of Information Analysis - PJ), dated from February 2008.
The references to the annexes and pages of the files were kept, just in order to allow anyone to ask for some particular document(s) to be translated ' I would do them ALL if I had the time, but I fear I won't be able to, so I'll be happy to go over those that you consider more interesting, if the request is rationally founded."

Is that how you read it?

If that is true then "(Central Division of Information Analysis - PJ)" is not actually a verified fact but a note.

are you sure...its there in portuguese on page 13...on PJ headed notepaper and its by Paolo Dias...and you had the nerve to say ...I was confused
« Last Edit: March 19, 2018, 06:13:46 PM by Davel »
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #972 on: March 19, 2018, 08:36:59 PM »
Quote from: Davel on March 19, 2018, 06:01:59 PM
are you sure...its there in portuguese on page 13...on PJ headed notepaper and its by Paolo Dias...and you had the nerve to say ...I was confused
I'm letting you teach me here.  I want you to explain to me how you are sure that this is a report written by the PJ.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline misty

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #973 on: March 19, 2018, 08:45:18 PM »
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #974 on: March 19, 2018, 09:05:02 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on March 19, 2018, 08:36:59 PM
I'm letting you teach me here.  I want you to explain to me how you are sure that this is a report written by the PJ.
While I was watching my favourite tv show... Misty has, done, the honours
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 103   Go Up
« previous next »