Author Topic: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence  (Read 151734 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1020 on: March 20, 2018, 01:00:50 PM »
In the Karen Matthews case the reason for the scent was found and it was indeed from a cadaver.

So there, was no dead body

Offline Carana

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1021 on: March 20, 2018, 01:46:23 PM »
So there, was no dead body

Suggestive of cadaver scent contaminant...

That might have been correct. Who knows? Did Grime or Harrison inform the PJ what that actually meant, and what they ought to investigate in order to exclude irrelevant possibilities beyond a shout out to ask if anyone had actually died there?

Offline Brietta

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1022 on: March 20, 2018, 01:56:05 PM »
In the Karen Matthews case the reason for the scent was found and it was indeed from a cadaver.

The police were looking for Shannon who had been reported as missing ... the dogs showed an interest in the scent they had been trained to recognise ... thankfully the police continued searching for Shannon who was found " - drugged in the base of a divan bed at a flat belonging to her mother's boyfriend's uncle -" http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-42972376

The police believe there had been a fair chance Shannon could have died during her protracted incarceration and her body disposed of.  In my opinion that would have been an interesting situation both for the prosecution and the defence ... given the dogs and furniture contaminated with the residual smell of the deaths of former owners.
Schoolgirl is 'lucky to be alive' http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/mobile/england/west_yorkshire/7762663.stm
« Last Edit: March 20, 2018, 01:59:12 PM by Brietta »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1023 on: March 20, 2018, 02:11:31 PM »
In the Karen Matthews case the reason for the scent was found and it was indeed from a cadaver.

Agreed there was a body, just not the one they were looking for.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1024 on: March 20, 2018, 03:20:12 PM »
Agreed there was a body, just not the one they were looking for.

Exactly. Now if supporters can show any evidence that there was any connection between the fixtures and fittings in 5a and a dead body there may be some mileage in their argument.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Carana

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1025 on: March 20, 2018, 03:31:37 PM »
Exactly. Now if supporters can show any evidence that there was any connection between the fixtures and fittings in 5a and a dead body there may be some mileage in their argument.

If the PJ had checked, who knows whether there may have been or not?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1026 on: March 20, 2018, 03:36:34 PM »
Agreed there was a body, just not the one they were looking for.

reminds of the stage psychic.......does anyone know a Paul...you might be easily impressed but I am not

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1027 on: March 20, 2018, 03:39:32 PM »
Exactly. Now if supporters can show any evidence that there was any connection between the fixtures and fittings in 5a and a dead body there may be some mileage in their argument.

there is no argument...no evidential relability...Grime rules

Offline G-Unit

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1028 on: March 20, 2018, 04:10:50 PM »
reminds of the stage psychic.......does anyone know a Paul...you might be easily impressed but I am not

I'm not really into psychics, but I recommend looking up Tom Binns/Ian D Montfort who is definitely worth viewing.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1029 on: March 20, 2018, 04:17:50 PM »
Exactly. Now if supporters can show any evidence that there was any connection between the fixtures and fittings in 5a and a dead body there may be some mileage in their argument.

there will be no mileage whatsoever...its a celestial teapot argumnet...and all you have to support your beliefs

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1030 on: March 20, 2018, 05:38:52 PM »
If the PJ had checked, who knows whether there may have been or not?

So only in 5a ? A tad unfortunate for the parents of a missing child wouldn’t you say ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1031 on: March 20, 2018, 05:43:20 PM »
So only in 5a ? A tad unfortunate for the parents of a missing child wouldn’t you say ?

not sure if you actually read this forum...how long were the dogs allowed to reconsider in 5a when in most cases they failed to alert...in other apartments where they failed to alert were they just brought staright out..


particularly with the alleged alert to CC...the opinion of the PJ officers who watched the dogs and had doubts...with Grime saying the alerts have no evidential value....my opinion that the alerts are basically valueless has some basis
« Last Edit: March 20, 2018, 05:48:36 PM by Davel »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1032 on: March 20, 2018, 06:05:31 PM »
Agreed there was a body, just not the one they were looking for.
where was the body in the Shannon Matthews case then?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1033 on: March 20, 2018, 06:07:35 PM »
So only in 5a ? A tad unfortunate for the parents of a missing child wouldn’t you say ?
You could say the same in the Shannon Matthews case.  If the child was still missing  I do believe we'd have a whole bunch of people convinced she died in that bedroom, wouldn't we?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1034 on: March 20, 2018, 06:09:48 PM »
If the PJ had checked, who knows whether there may have been or not?
It might have also helped if they'd checked out all the other people who'd ever stayed in that apartment (both before and after Madeleine went missing) for details of their possible proximity to a dead body. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".