Author Topic: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence  (Read 151770 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1065 on: March 21, 2018, 09:01:06 AM »
I think Gerry's, rather clever comment has gone over the heads of some posters

The fact that the dogs cannot talk and cannot be cross examined is one reason why the, alerts have no evidential value

I don't see what's clever about making a childish comment about dogs which assist the police in finding the bodies of people so their nearest and dearest can have closure. In fact it was incredibly stupid, in my opinion. It suggested that the police forces using these dogs were spending money on training and maintaining handlers and dogs which were only occasionally successful.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1066 on: March 21, 2018, 09:06:59 AM »
I don't see what's clever about making a childish comment about dogs which assist the police in finding the bodies of people so their nearest and dearest can have closure. In fact it was incredibly stupid, in my opinion. It suggested that the police forces using these dogs were spending money on training and maintaining handlers and dogs which were only occasionally successful.

That's, your opinion... As we know the PJ have completely misunderstood  the, alerts hence the proven facts.... When people are misrepresenting things to prove your daughter is dead and that you are responsible... I find Gerry's actions quite reasonable

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1067 on: March 21, 2018, 09:32:15 AM »
I don't see what's clever about making a childish comment about dogs which assist the police in finding the bodies of people so their nearest and dearest can have closure. In fact it was incredibly stupid, in my opinion. It suggested that the police forces using these dogs were spending money on training and maintaining handlers and dogs which were only occasionally successful.

Interesting you were critical of ferryman yesterday yet it was ferryman who established that Eddie had only been deployed 37 times, in 5 years..... That's, almost one case, every two months. Eddie hasn't found a fat lot in his career... So occasionally successful seems, quite accurate

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1068 on: March 21, 2018, 10:41:40 AM »
You singularly overestimate any significance attached to dog indications ... even hypothetical ones.

It would appear you don’t want to answer the question Brietta and can I remind you that it was you who posted that the dogs alerting to Murat’s property would lead to a trial not me. Can you therefore explain your claim please ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1069 on: March 21, 2018, 10:52:37 AM »
Had Madeleine been killed in the apartment during a bungled burglary & her body removed, Eddie's alerts would have been meaningless when considering minimum post-mortem contamination time.

So you think a dead body may have been in 5a but the cadaver dog alert had nothing to do with that body ? Further that the McCanns were unlucky enough to be the only ones to actually have a dead body in there apartment AND  for the cadaver dogs to alert to the scent they were trained to ?

Wouldn’t that be one coincidence too far ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1070 on: March 21, 2018, 11:22:38 AM »
So you think a dead body may have been in 5a but the cadaver dog alert had nothing to do with that body ? Further that the McCanns were unlucky enough to be the only ones to actually have a dead body in there apartment AND  for the cadaver dogs to alert to the scent they were trained to ?

Wouldn’t that be one coincidence too far ?

There, are no coincidences there
Your last statement is making an assumption that the alert was to cadaver... That has not been confirmed
5a is the only apartment where the digs we're given an extended, amount of time to alert
If maddie had died in the apartment and been removed soon after there would have been no time for the odour to develop

Offline G-Unit

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1071 on: March 21, 2018, 11:28:57 AM »
That's, your opinion... As we know the PJ have completely misunderstood  the, alerts hence the proven facts.... When people are misrepresenting things to prove your daughter is dead and that you are responsible... I find Gerry's actions quite reasonable

It is indeed my opinion, as I think I made clear. What was gained by making such a flippant comment then? How did it advance the McCann's aims? 
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1072 on: March 21, 2018, 11:49:19 AM »
There, are no coincidences there
Your last statement is making an assumption that the alert was to cadaver... That has not been confirmed
5a is the only apartment where the digs we're given an extended, amount of time to alert
If maddie had died in the apartment and been removed soon after there would have been no time for the odour to develop

So the cadaver dog alerted to what it was trained to alert to in apartment 5a and only 5a, an apartment that, OG have claimed, may have had a dead body in it and the alert isn’t to that dead body. Do you know how bonkers that sounds ?

Further I’m no dog trainer but I would assume Grime spent more time in 5a than any other apartment because of the dog’s reaction before he even entered the apartment. Even the untrained eye can see the change in his behaviour.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1073 on: March 21, 2018, 12:50:04 PM »
Interesting you were critical of ferryman yesterday yet it was ferryman who established that Eddie had only been deployed 37 times, in 5 years..... That's, almost one case, every two months. Eddie hasn't found a fat lot in his career... So occasionally successful seems, quite accurate

Ferryman's argument was based on an FOI request to South Yorkshire police. The answer didn't cover a five year period, it covered a four year period;

"The information supplied therefore relates to his service between 2003 and 2007."

During that time Eddie was used 37 times, mostly outside the SYP area.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8032.315

The other point I would make is whether SYP held all of the records relating to Eddie, or just the ones they had been paid for? 

Anyone doing research should, in my opinion, be careful to present the correct facts. Failing to do that tends to mislead those who later quote their findings.



Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1074 on: March 21, 2018, 12:50:57 PM »
It is indeed my opinion, as I think I made clear. What was gained by making such a flippant comment then? How did it advance the McCann's aims?
Why does it have to advance any aims... The poor man was upset are his daughter

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1075 on: March 21, 2018, 12:53:17 PM »
So the cadaver dog alerted to what it was trained to alert to in apartment 5a and only 5a, an apartment that, OG have claimed, may have had a dead body in it and the alert isn’t to that dead body. Do you know how bonkers that sounds ?

Further I’m no dog trainer but I would assume Grime spent more time in 5a than any other apartment because of the dog’s reaction before he even entered the apartment. Even the untrained eye can see the change in his behaviour.

You do not know what the dog alerted to... Neither dies grime... Now you are reading the digs body language

The bottom lir
No evidential reliability... That's, what counts

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1076 on: March 21, 2018, 12:57:38 PM »
Ferryman's argument was based on an FOI request to South Yorkshire police. The answer didn't cover a five year period, it covered a four year period;

"The information supplied therefore relates to his service between 2003 and 2007."

During that time Eddie was used 37 times, mostly outside the SYP area.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8032.315

The other point I would make is whether SYP held all of the records relating to Eddie, or just the ones they had been paid for? 

Anyone doing research should, in my opinion, be careful to present the correct facts. Failing to do that tends to mislead those who later quote their findings.

Check your maths.. 2003,4,5,6,7....is 5 years
Eddies CV. supplied by grime is sparse in results

Eddie was used 37 times and it's clear that includes usage both inside and outside the SYP area

« Last Edit: March 21, 2018, 01:09:03 PM by Davel »

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1077 on: March 21, 2018, 01:21:26 PM »
You do not know what the dog alerted to... Neither dies grime... Now you are reading the digs body language

The bottom lir
No evidential reliability... That's, what counts

" 'Allo, 'Allo zees ees Night'awk calling"

I'll skip the "It's the tobacco that counts" gag

"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1078 on: March 21, 2018, 01:27:08 PM »
You do not know what the dog alerted to... Neither dies grime... Now you are reading the digs body language

The bottom lir
No evidential reliability... That's, what counts

Even if I couldn’t see how excited Eddie became on entering 5a Grime says his behaviour changes. He also says Eddie alerts to what he is trained to alert to.

TBH if you think that OG would be foolish enough to believe the dog alerts weren’t connected to what may have been a dead child in 5a then there really is no convincing you.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1079 on: March 21, 2018, 01:38:46 PM »
Even if I couldn’t see how excited Eddie became on entering 5a Grime says his behaviour changes. He also says Eddie alerts to what he is trained to alert to.

TBH if you think that OG would be foolish enough to believe the dog alerts weren’t connected to what may have been a dead child in 5a then there really is no convincing you.

He didn't say eddie alerted to what he's trained to in 5a... He said it was possible it was cadaver odour.... Possible.... And also used the word suggestive...

I'm not convinced... Particularly  seeing the alert to CCand the remarks of the PJ...