Author Topic: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence  (Read 179280 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1200 on: March 23, 2018, 09:12:37 AM »
Allegedly but no one knows for certain, nor what grounds they would make the appeal.
It's one of these wait and see things.

I would say the statement in the accounts shows the case is being taken to the, ECHR

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1201 on: March 23, 2018, 09:13:54 AM »
Of which the truth is a defends.

The mccanns have clearly been libelled in Portugal... Previous ECHR. case law, supports it

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1202 on: March 23, 2018, 09:16:31 AM »
Of which the truth is a defends.
the truth is there is no proof regarding what the dogs alerted to, and that's just one tiny part of it.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1203 on: March 23, 2018, 09:19:57 AM »
I would say the statement in the accounts shows the case is being taken to the, ECHR

It didn't say it had been accepted though.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1204 on: March 23, 2018, 09:20:53 AM »
It didn't say it had been accepted though.

I've done some research... Have you... And there are no grounds to reject it

Offline barrier

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1205 on: March 23, 2018, 09:22:12 AM »
I've done some research... Have you... And there are no grounds to reject it
IYO
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1206 on: March 23, 2018, 09:23:34 AM »
IYO

Then let's have your opinion.... On what grounds will it not be accepted...do you have any opinion at all

Offline barrier

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1207 on: March 23, 2018, 09:32:36 AM »
Then let's have your opinion.... On what grounds will it not be accepted...do you have any opinion at all

My opinion counts for nothing along with yours,we have a knowledge that the McCanns have supposedly applied to the ECHR,its not known what they are contesting or even if its been accepted,end of.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1208 on: March 23, 2018, 09:33:47 AM »
I would say the statement in the accounts shows the case is being taken to the, ECHR

IMO I think the McCanns are fully aware that their case will not get much further than their application  but what else could they do?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1209 on: March 23, 2018, 09:36:10 AM »
Do you accept therefore that the judgement against Amaral was wrong then?

There is more than one judgement against Amaral on the books I believe ... to which one is it you refer?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1210 on: March 23, 2018, 09:44:12 AM »

Even if the McCanns are successful at the ECHR,  the good book will have received yet more publicity from the process.
Supposing the good book is somehow banned again, that will just make more people want to read it to see what the problem is. They won't be able to remove all trace of it, it will still be available to read somewhere on the interweb.

The McCann's main issue is that they don't want their remaining children to read it. Eventually, I believe they will.

Something of a lose, lose situation for the Doctors McCann.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1211 on: March 23, 2018, 09:48:30 AM »
There is more than one judgement against Amaral on the books I believe ... to which one is it you refer?

The one I posted a link to previously.post no 1127 if memory serves.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1212 on: March 23, 2018, 10:00:04 AM »
Even if the McCanns are successful at the ECHR,  the good book will have received yet more publicity from the process.
Supposing the good book is somehow banned again, that will just make more people want to read it to see what the problem is. They won't be able to remove all trace of it, it will still be available to read somewhere on the interweb.

The McCann's main issue is that they don't want their remaining children to read it. Eventually, I believe they will.

Something of a lose, lose situation for the Doctors McCann.
Did the book surge to the top of the bestsellers list when the court found in favour of Amaral?  Did it get published here as was suggested in some quarters?  By now IMO it's not a question of how far and wide it is read, what is important for the McCanns IMO is that it is legally acknowledged to be defamatory and based on nothing more than half-truths and fictions.   Then people can read it forearmed with that knowledge.   And also, that the author of this defamatory tale never profits from it, would be a strong motivating factor IMO.   
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1213 on: March 23, 2018, 10:04:24 AM »
Even if the McCanns are successful at the ECHR,  the good book will have received yet more publicity from the process.
Supposing the good book is somehow banned again, that will just make more people want to read it to see what the problem is. They won't be able to remove all trace of it, it will still be available to read somewhere on the interweb.

The McCann's main issue is that they don't want their remaining children to read it. Eventually, I believe they will.

Something of a lose, lose situation for the Doctors McCann.

I doubt they would care if their children read the book...... The twins would recognise it for the rubbish it is... Imo

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Do the sceptics simply misunderstand the evidence
« Reply #1214 on: March 23, 2018, 10:05:42 AM »
My opinion counts for nothing along with yours,we have a knowledge that the McCanns have supposedly applied to the ECHR,its not known what they are contesting or even if its been accepted,end of.

You don't seem to have any knowledge or opinion... It's clear from the recent accounts they have taken the case to the ECHR IMO
« Last Edit: March 23, 2018, 10:11:36 AM by slartibartfast »