According to some, there is certainly circumstantial evidence of abduction.

[ShiningInLuz]

If it's unimportant to you why have you made so many replies to my posts... Why not simply ignore them..
We decided a long time ago that no ones, posts or opinions, make any difference so it's pointless you repeating something  we are all aware of
There us no battleground  as you put it.... The opinion of the vast majority of Portuguese is, also now unimportant...it's done and dusted
As you think posting is pointless please stop at any time

I respectfully suggest that you don't take up PR in any form.

Clarence Mitchell has restricted himself to a UK audience.  That will do b****r all for Madeleine.  But then he's fighting for the McCanns, not Madeleine.

The battleground is and always was Portugal.

[Brietta]

I respectfully suggest that you don't take up PR in any form.

Clarence Mitchell has restricted himself to a UK audience.  That will do b****r all for Madeleine.  But then he's fighting for the McCanns, not Madeleine.

The battleground is and always was Portugal.

Why "battleground"?
It is an active case involving a missing child which the Portuguese authorities are conducting.

[Mr Gray]

I respectfully suggest that you don't take up PR in any form.

Clarence Mitchell has restricted himself to a UK audience.  That will do b****r all for Madeleine.  But then he's fighting for the McCanns, not Madeleine.

The battleground is and always was Portugal.

Why would I want to take up PR when I have a very successful  career, already..
You seem preoccupied  with it... This is not about PR it's, about justice for a missing child and when you have the lead detective claiming he can prove she is dead when he cannot then THAT is doing nothing for maddie

[Mr Gray]

Why "battleground"?
It is an active case involving a missing child which the Portuguese authorities are conducting.

There is no battleground... Someone  needs a reality check..
Both police forces are working towards a, single, aim... Justice for Maddie

[ShiningInLuz]

Why "battleground"?
It is an active case involving a missing child which the Portuguese authorities are conducting.

If public opinion here is 90% anti-McCann, can you not see it is a battleground for hearts and mind?

Why should a Portuguese innocent Smithman come forward?  Who cares about the McCanns here?

[jassi]

Don't suppose there will be many in UK who really care, either

[Mr Gray]

If public opinion here is 90% anti-McCann, can you not see it is a battleground for hearts and mind?

Why should a Portuguese innocent Smithman come forward?  Who cares about the McCanns here?

Who cares about maddie in Portugal... That's the question...

[ShiningInLuz]

Why would I want to take up PR when I have a very successful  career, already..
You seem preoccupied  with it... This is not about PR it's, about justice for a missing child and when you have the lead detective claiming he can prove she is dead when he cannot then THAT is doing nothing for maddie

Respectfully, don't take up police work either.

You are re-running the McCanns v Amaral.  The McCanns lost.  It's time to accept reality and move on.

The battleground is still Portugal, because that's where Madeleine disappeared.

[Miss Taken Identity]

If public opinion here is 90% anti-McCann, can you not see it is a battleground for hearts and mind?

Why should a Portuguese innocent Smithman come forward?  Who cares about the McCanns here?

I would agree that the battleground for hearts and minds are in Portugal, and that was caused by the Tapas crew involved with the non care of their children. I also believe the parents hired people to protect them and their reputation.
 When they made the decision to trapse around acting like the 'Big I am's' it did get peoples back up. They were making derogatory claims about the Pj GNR and  people not  looking for Maddie- this was done for sympathy. They blogged and jogged did the whole celebrity bit meeting pope within days- phoning the prime minister etc and didn't go searching them selves. Their arrogance was well displayed for all to see. Blaming everyone, but themselves. that really didn't go down well at all....

SO has any supporters offered this circumstantial proof of  stranger abduction yet?  It pays to remind some that it was claimed there was not ENOUGH evidence to charge anyone  regarding the disappearance of young MBM.

[Mr Gray]

I would agree that the battleground for hearts and minds are in Portugal, and that was caused by the Tapas crew involved with the non care of their children. I also believe the parents hired people to protect them and their reputation.
 When they made the decision to trapse around acting like the 'Big I am's' it did get peoples back up. They were making derogatory claims about the Pj GNR and  people not  looking for Maddie- this was done for sympathy. They blogged and jogged did the whole celebrity bit meeting pope within days- phoning the prime minister etc and didn't go searching them selves. Their arrogance was well displayed for all to see. Blaming everyone, but themselves. that really didn't go down well at all....

SO has any supporters offered this circumstantial proof of  stranger abduction yet?  It pays to remind some that it was claimed there was not ENOUGH evidence to charge anyone  regarding the disappearance of young MBM.

Actually I have proof of abduction...

[Miss Taken Identity]

Actually I have proof of abduction...

yeah? ok  but we would like to hear your circumstantial evidence first as you have claimed.. we will wait for the 'proof' you have to be explained by OG and PJ.

[Mr Gray]

yeah? ok  but we would like to hear your circumstantial evidence first as you have claimed.. we will wait for the 'proof' you have to be explained by OG and PJ.

I have, proof based on amarals treatise on proving things... It's pretty pathetic and full of holes... But acceptable to sceptics on the forum and most of the population  of Portugal  according to sil

[Robittybob1]

Actually I have proof of abduction...

Yeah OK so what is it? 

[Mr Gray]

Yeah OK so what is it?

Read the post above

[Robittybob1]

Read the post above

What this bit of rubbish?  "I have, proof based on amarals treatise on proving things... It's pretty pathetic and full of holes... But acceptable to sceptics on the forum and most of the population  of Portugal  according to sil"  That isn't proof IMO.