Short answers to Trudies reasons -
• No forensics link Jeremy to the murders.
Wrong. No evidence on Sheila incriminates Bamber.
----------
• There was more than one sound moderator, exhibit labels were manipulated and four moderators were passed off to the jury as one and recent forensics have revealed that the silencer wasn’t even used in the murders.
This is similar to Mike's theories.
Have there been 'recent forensic tests' ?
--------
• We are asked to believe that Jeremy was able to get Shelia to calmly lay down whilst he shot her after first killing her children and her parents. I conclude that this would have been impossible.
Not impossible. Pretty easy as she was under sedation & a light woman.
What is Trudies Sheila scenario ?
--------
• We are asked to believe that Jeremy got from the murder scene home in time to make a phone call and leave no forensic trace. No Mud, blood or gun shot residue. I conclude that this would have been impossible.
He was not tested for gun shot residue.
----------
• We now know that Nevill called the police also, a fact that the jury never heard.
That is alright then.
---------
• Non-disclosure of evidence by Essex Police in this case stinks of a cover-up. In fact the 1986 Dickinson report into their conduct was a whitewash based on the biased testimony of Jeremy’s relatives. The very fact that the original murder/suicide file remains under PII is very suspicious.
Supporters have conflicting views on whether Bamber has everything. But no harm in always saying he hasn't.
--------
• We know that the police made a mess of the investigation but failing to mention for twenty odd years that they used the bodies in a training exercise and, furthermore, re-staged and photographed Shelia with the gun and then tried to make out it was Jeremy who had done the staging, is appalling.
When was this training exercise ?
How does this show Bamber is innocent ?
----------
• The relatives were terrified that they were going to lose their land and livelihood should Jeremy inherit and had everything to gain from Jeremy’s conviction. Certain members of the family were also incredulous that the “adopted” son would inherit everything.
This is accusing the relatives of fabricating the silencer. Which was the only piece of evidence they had access to.
How did the relatives fabricating one silencer, turn into 4 silencers for the jury ?
--------
• Julie Mugford was a bitter jealous jilted woman, who would have been charged with drug offences, cheque book fraud and burglary. Instead she got the ultimate revenge on Jeremy and gained £25K from the NOTW and immunity from prosecution. Not hard to see why she lied.
Julie would not have been arrested for anything if she had not approached the police.
Julie must have been jealous. And totally mad.
--------
• Whose fingerprints were on the Bible and why was this never disclosed?
Sheila may have touched June's bible pre massacre. Or Bamber put her hand on it when trying different staging positions.
As she says, no one knows. So does not show Bamber is innocent.
---------
• Why were exhibits destroyed despite a Court Order for them to be retained?
No idea. It had been a long time since the conviction.
What items ?
----------
• Why was it claimed that Shelia’s feet were clean when actually photographs show otherwise?
One photo shows redness.
Certainly no foot injuries
---------
• Jeremy passed a lie detector test. This in itself as been criticised as a meaningless exercise but most importantly for me is why on earth would he push so hard to take it if he was guilty and risked failing. Now that would have been game over!
Correct, it means nothing. If he had failed, it would have been kept quiet.
--------
