« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 23   Go Down

Author Topic: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?  (Read 43475 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #240 on: June 06, 2018, 01:05:38 PM »
I wonder how tall Dr Totman is?
Logged
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #241 on: June 06, 2018, 01:20:00 PM »
Quote from: G-Unit on June 06, 2018, 01:05:38 PM
I wonder how tall Dr Totman is?
Good question.  I'm having my doubts that it was Julian Totman that SY photographed 2013(?).   Parting seems to be on the wrong side.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline jassi

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #242 on: June 06, 2018, 01:27:49 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on June 06, 2018, 01:20:00 PM
Good question.  I'm having my doubts that it was Julian Totman that SY photographed 2013(?).   Parting seems to be on the wrong side.

A mirror image. That's why he appears to be walking the wrong way .    8(0(*
Maybe Tanner was looking through a glass darkly.
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline misty

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #243 on: June 06, 2018, 01:30:28 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on June 06, 2018, 01:20:00 PM
Good question.  I'm having my doubts that it was Julian Totman that SY photographed 2013(?).   Parting seems to be on the wrong side.

IMO it was Julian Totman in the CW 2013 programme. He is over 6' tall. Image below.

http://www.harcourtmedical.co.uk/Staff.asp?title=Meet%20the%20Doctors&keepThis=true&TB_iframe=true&height=450&width=780      for images of Dr Totman & wife Dr. Rachel Clapton 2018.

Logged

Offline G-Unit

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #244 on: June 06, 2018, 01:55:07 PM »
Quote from: misty on June 06, 2018, 01:30:28 PM
IMO it was Julian Totman in the CW 2013 programme. He is over 6' tall. Image below.

http://www.harcourtmedical.co.uk/Staff.asp?title=Meet%20the%20Doctors&keepThis=true&TB_iframe=true&height=450&width=780      for images of Dr Totman & wife Dr. Rachel Clapton 2018.

I thought he seemed tall.

JANE: He was about probably 5'8 tall, he was taller than me but not 6' and so between those two.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/7106086.stm


Dark skinned individual, male sex, aged between 35-40, slim physical appearance, about 1.70m tall. (5 feet 6 inches)
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE-TANNER.htm

1.7m tal1 approximately with a slim build.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIME_LINE_3_MAY_07.htm

1.7m tal1 approximately with a slim build.
Logged
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #245 on: June 06, 2018, 01:55:55 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on June 06, 2018, 12:29:26 PM
You're saying that she must have surely known the identity of Totman, so how does she explain that one to the police?  Totman in any case was walking in the "wrong" direction so how does she explain that to the police?  Totman never saw Gerry or Jez apparently - so how does she explain that to the police?  You've got to admit it's a highly risky strategy for her to undertake and what's in it for her at the end of the day?   At what point in the evening of the 3rd does she tell Gerry what she saw, and how do you think Gerry would broach the subject of using that sighting?

IMO it is more than likely that Totman is the man Tanner saw. We know that she didn’t recognise him. We know he was ( to our understanding) going in the wrong direction and that he didn’t see Gerry.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2018, 09:32:10 PM by John »
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline kizzy

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #246 on: June 06, 2018, 02:41:56 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on June 05, 2018, 09:50:29 PM
Have you free access to the outside world?


I sure have i live in it.


I think you should look at yourself before ridiculing others.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2018, 09:33:05 PM by John »
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #247 on: June 06, 2018, 03:05:21 PM »
VS said

“ You're saying that she must have surely known the identity of Totman, so how does she explain that one to the police?  Totman in any case was walking in the "wrong" direction so how does she explain that to the police?  Totman never saw Gerry or Jez apparently - so how does she explain that to the police?  ”

All of the above seems to have come to pass.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2018, 03:14:42 PM by Brietta »
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?n8
« Reply #248 on: June 06, 2018, 03:28:06 PM »
The CPS visited Portugal in June 2013. Crimewatch revealed Crecheman in October 2013. Was the CPS visit connected to how Tanner was treated ?
« Last Edit: June 06, 2018, 03:45:28 PM by Angelo222 »
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #249 on: June 06, 2018, 03:36:53 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on June 06, 2018, 03:05:21 PM
VS said

“ You're saying that she must have surely known the identity of Totman, so how does she explain that one to the police?  Totman in any case was walking in the "wrong" direction so how does she explain that to the police?  Totman never saw Gerry or Jez apparently - so how does she explain that to the police?  ”

All of the above seems to have come to pass.
Does it?  Cites for all three then please.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #250 on: June 06, 2018, 03:38:33 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on June 06, 2018, 03:36:53 PM
Does it?  Cites for all three then please.

No cites just common sense.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?n8
« Reply #251 on: June 06, 2018, 03:47:43 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on June 06, 2018, 03:28:06 PM
The CPS visited Portugal in June 2013. Crimewatch revealed Crecheman in October 2013. Was the CPS visit connected to how Tanner was treated ?
How was Tanner treated?
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?n8
« Reply #252 on: June 06, 2018, 04:26:05 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on June 06, 2018, 03:47:43 PM
How was Tanner treated?

In my opinion absolutely abominably in 2007 and here, today in 2018 it continues.
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Robittybob1

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #253 on: June 06, 2018, 05:22:25 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on June 06, 2018, 01:55:55 PM
IMO it is more than likely that Totman is the man Tanner saw. We know that she didn’t recognise him. We know he was ( to our understanding) going in the wrong direction and that he didn’t see Gerry.
On what basis do you say IMO it is more than likely that Totman is the man Tanner saw.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?
« Reply #254 on: June 06, 2018, 05:27:11 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on June 06, 2018, 03:05:21 PM
VS said

“ You're saying that she must have surely known the identity of Totman, so how does she explain that one to the police?  Totman in any case was walking in the "wrong" direction so how does she explain that to the police?  Totman never saw Gerry or Jez apparently - so how does she explain that to the police?  ”

All of the above seems to have come to pass.
Cite please.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 23   Go Up
« previous next »