In what circumstances can the "No comment" response be considered suspicious?

[Robittybob1]

That is exactly what I would do If I read it... However ,  there is no harm in point out some ikle discrepancies... now is there.

Did you mean "ickle"?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not at all. If what they say is verified by another independent source then I’m willing to believe them.

So sometimes they're truthful but only when you deem it so, is that right?  Who verified Gerry McCann's stated time of 10.13pm for the alarm being raised?  No one to the best of my knowledge but you choose to believe him on that particular point.  I wonder why...?

[Miss Taken Identity]

So sometimes they're truthful but only when you deem it so, is that right?  Who verified Gerry McCann's stated time of 10.13pm for the alarm being raised?  No one to the best of my knowledge but you choose to believe him on that particular point.  I wonder why...?

Perhaps some things can be verified and some can't. It isn't difficult really.

[faithlilly]

So sometimes they're truthful but only when you deem it so, is that right?  Who verified Gerry McCann's stated time of 10.13pm for the alarm being raised?  No one to the best of my knowledge but you choose to believe him on that particular point.  I wonder why...?

I didn’t categorically say the time was correct, I said IF, and if Gerry had enough time to be Smithman.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I didn’t categorically say the time was correct, I said IF, and if Gerry had enough time to be Smithman.

You have to therefore concede that if that time is wrong (highly likely taking into account everyone else's statements and the fact that the PJ concluded the alarm was raised at 10pm) that Gerry could not have been Smithman, which blows a rather large hole in your theory.

[Miss Taken Identity]

You have to therefore concede that if that time is wrong (highly likely taking into account everyone else's statements and the fact that the PJ concluded the alarm was raised at 10pm) that Gerry could not have been Smithman, which blows a rather large hole in your theory.

Did the PJ conclude the alarm was raised at 10pm precisely? It would appear the PJ were at a loss to try and get anything with a time on it to make any sense at all. and much later just to check and make sure they were all telling the truth the PJ requested a reconstruction of which the  TAPAS 9 refused to do... so well there you have it.

[faithlilly]

You have to therefore concede that if that time is wrong (highly likely taking into account everyone else's statements and the fact that the PJ concluded the alarm was raised at 10pm) that Gerry could not have been Smithman, which blows a rather large hole in your theory.

Most of the witnesses put the alarm at ‘around 10pm’. I think 10.13 could be considered ‘around 10pm’.

Gerry’s very precise about the time. That’s odd if it was a guess.

[jassi]

Most of the witnesses put the alarm at ‘around 10pm’. I think 10.13 could be considered ‘around 10pm’.

Gerry’s very precise about the time. That’s odd if it was a guess.

Nothing if not precise is our Gerry. Didn't he have the door angled at 5 degrees?

[Angelo222]

Except the first question asked by the PJ wasn’t  ‘did you dispose of your daughter’s body’.

Is it revealed in the files what Gerry was asked?

[Angelo222]

If Kate's book is entirely fictional in your view perhaps you should stop using it as evidence to prove your point about anything at all?  Perhaps she only said she muttered "f....ing tossers" under her breath but actually didn't. Perhaps we should simply disregard every word written or uttered by the McCanns on the basis that not a single word can be trusted to be true.  How's that?

It really doesn't matter whether she said it, muttered it or thought it imo. She made a point of writing it three times in her book which says more about her in my opinion.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Most of the witnesses put the alarm at ‘around 10pm’. I think 10.13 could be considered ‘around 10pm’.

Gerry’s very precise about the time. That’s odd if it was a guess.

10.13 is around quarter past 10, not 10pm.  Odd that given most others put the alarm earlier that he wuld deliberately destroy a perfect alibi by going “off message” but I’m sure you’ve got an answer for that too.

[Robittybob1]

Most of the witnesses put the alarm at ‘around 10pm’. I think 10.13 could be considered ‘around 10pm’.

Gerry’s very precise about the time. That’s odd if it was a guess.

Cite please.

[Robittybob1]

10.13 is around quarter past 10, not 10pm.  Odd that given most others put the alarm earlier that he wuld deliberately destroy a perfect alibi by going “off message” but I’m sure you’ve got an answer for that too.

I'm wiping posts deemed of a "personal attack", so just be careful here please "but I’m sure you’ve got an answer for that too" is about the limit IMO.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm wiping posts deemed of a "personal attack", so just be careful here please "but I’m sure you’ve got an answer for that too" is about the limit IMO.

Thank you.

[Robittybob1]

Thank you.

Rather than saying "but I’m sure you’ve got an answer for that too" you said "but I’m sure there is an answer for that too", I would consider that opinion, without putting the other person in the spotlight.