Question about Nevill's watch

[Aunt Agatha]

I believe you are genuine in what you state Aunt Agatha but not sure if you are aware you’ve potentially (I say ‘potentially’ as I don’t believe Bamber’s case is going anywhere) created a problem for Bamber & his representatives as I’ve pointed out here

You know Bamber’s narrative has changed and I don’t believe you would lie about this fact

You stated here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3851.msg358367.html#msg358367

“Based on what we knew at the beginning we believed the silencer was used........upon revelations he changed his mind.  When we last spoke he believed the silencer was not used”

I have always stated this!

In the beginning we had absolutely no idea what happened that evening... We were given the pieces of the jigsaw and we always questioned it but it was stated at court that the silencer was used.  FACT!

Over the years information and paperwork that Jeremy had not seen before the trial came to light... Based on this new information he would try again to get the pieces of the jigsaw to fit together.

We are all the same, we conclude things based on the information we are given.  Once further information is received we review our previous findings and may now come to a different conclusion.
He is innocent!!

[Nicholas]

I cannot recall.

When you and I communicated previously, you talked of a ‘smear campaign’ against you.

I’m of the opinion this was started by Bamber because of your ‘knowledge’ of him

[Aunt Agatha]

It doesn’t matter. The police will have the records.

Though you did allude to there being paperwork in one of your previous posts - the post where you claimed Mike T publicised your home address (that post appears to have been removed?)

Again, if Mike T has ‘paperwork’ so will the police etc

Yes, as stated here I requested he remove the post and he did.
I never saw the paperwork, I cannot recall him posting a copy of the receipt however I have not forgotten how he posted my address. It was not my full address, but it was enough.

[Aunt Agatha]

When you and I communicated previously, you talked of a ‘smear campaign’ against you.

I’m of the opinion this was started by Bamber because of your ‘knowledge’ of him

It was not started by Jeremy.

[Nicholas]

It was not started by Jeremy.

It centred around him

[Nicholas]

I have always stated this!

In the beginning we had absolutely no idea what happened that evening... We were given the pieces of the jigsaw and we always questioned it but it was stated at court that the silencer was used.  FACT!

Over the years information and paperwork that Jeremy had not seen before the trial came to light... Based on this new information he would try again to get the pieces of the jigsaw to fit together.

We are all the same, we conclude things based on the information we are given.  Once further information is received we review our previous findings and may now come to a different conclusion.
He is innocent!!

I know you have as will many others know

[Nicholas]

I have always stated this!

In the beginning we had absolutely no idea what happened that evening... We were given the pieces of the jigsaw and we always questioned it but it was stated at court that the silencer was used.  FACT!

Over the years information and paperwork that Jeremy had not seen before the trial came to light... Based on this new information he would try again to get the pieces of the jigsaw to fit together.

We are all the same, we conclude things based on the information we are given.  Once further information is received we review our previous findings and may now come to a different conclusion.
He is innocent!!

I believe you Aunt Agatha

[Nicholas]

I have always stated this!

In the beginning we had absolutely no idea what happened that evening... We were given the pieces of the jigsaw and we always questioned it but it was stated at court that the silencer was used.  FACT!

Over the years information and paperwork that Jeremy had not seen before the trial came to light... Based on this new information he would try again to get the pieces of the jigsaw to fit together.

We are all the same, we conclude things based on the information we are given.  Once further information is received we review our previous findings and may now come to a different conclusion.
He is innocent!!

If you believe this to be true,

how can his legal team now claim his narrative has remained the same when you know it hasn’t?

[Nicholas]

Yes, as stated here I requested he remove the post and he did.
I never saw the paperwork, I cannot recall him posting a copy of the receipt however I have not forgotten how he posted my address. It was not my full address, but it was enough.

Did this happen around the time Bamber made the decision he did about you two?

You don’t have to answer if you don’t want to btw just thought it might help newcomers to the forum understand your current position so to speak

[Aunt Agatha]

If you believe this to be true,

how can his legal team now claim his narrative has remained the same when you know it hasn’t?

His narrative has always been that he is innocent and did not kill his family. 

One could only stick to the exact same narrative if one knew beforehand exactly what did happen that night.

Therefore, his views or understanding of what really happened are based solely upon the information he has at any given time.

However, I would like to point out that evidence and findings undertaken by experts and those in the community have Never proven him guilty, instead they have raised more questions about his imprisonment and possible miscarriage of justice.

[Aunt Agatha]

It centred around him

Of course it did

[Aunt Agatha]

Did this happen around the time Bamber made the decision he did about you two?

You don’t have to answer if you don’t want to btw just thought it might help newcomers to the forum understand your current position so to speak

It was I that made the decision!

[Nicholas]

Hid narrative has always been that he is innocent and did not kill his family. 

One could only stick to the exact same narrative if one knew beforehand exactly what did happen that night.

Therefore, his views or understanding of what really happened are based solely upon the information he has at any given time.

However, I would like to point out that evidence and findings undertaken by experts and those in the community have Never proven him guilty, instead they have raised more questions about his imprisonment and possible miscarriage of justice.

Fair enough

But you did say he used to say the silencer was attached to the gun but then he changed his mind

How many years was it before he changed his mind about the silencer evidence, can you remember?

[Nicholas]

Of course it did

Thought so

[Nicholas]

Of course it did

Weren’t people arrested or something or other?