Question about Nevill's watch

[Aunt Agatha]

If everything else disappears, it remains. Maybe he gave it to me for that, to clear his name should anything happen to him in prison.

This sounds like it’s conceived by an unrestrained imagination
You, of all people, are in no position to judge me.

[APRIL]

Think your subconscious betrays you sometimes

Hanging on to a conviction of someone's innocence gives a sense of worth and meaning to a relationship with them.

[Nicholas]

Maybe. But I've kept it for the purpose I've just stated, nothing more.

Originally you stated Bamber told you not to throw it away

You’ve since changed the goal posts and are now claiming to have kept it for DNA purposes

[Aunt Agatha]

I am not 'hanging on' as you describe it.

[Nicholas]

This sounds like it’s conceived by an unrestrained imagination
You, of all people, are in no position to judge me.

 

[Aunt Agatha]

Originally you stated Bamber told you not to throw it away

You’ve since changed the goal posts and are now claiming to have kept it for DNA purposes

That does not change a thing. He gave me other items as I've disclosed here that I got rid of. I'm not compelled to keep anything of his. I have chosen to keep them safe.

[Nicholas]

Think your subconscious betrays you sometimes

As do your projections Aunt Agatha

[Nicholas]

Hanging on to a conviction of someone's innocence gives a sense of worth and meaning to a relationship with them.

And to the ‘self’ it would appear

[Nicholas]

“We were very close at the time - maybe he wanted to give me a piece of 'himself' to take home.
....

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3851.msg358326.html#msg358326

Maybe this is what you think ‘he wanted’ by giving you his hair

[Nicholas]

That does not change a thing. He gave me other items as I've disclosed here that I got rid of. I'm not compelled to keep anything of his. I have chosen to keep them safe.

I’ve no idea what you’ve ‘got rid of’ other than a jewellery box, which I’ve also no idea who it belonged to?

[Nicholas]

You, of all people, are in no position to judge me.

Aunt Agatha you stated,


“Are you telling me you would not have done the same for your husband when he claimed his innocence... ”



Were you secretly married to Jeremy Bamber?

[Nicholas]

Maybe. But I've kept it for the purpose I've just stated, nothing more.

I do not trust the CCRC or the Police where Jeremy is concerned. Who knows what could be extracted from it in time to come.

This is fanciful

[John]

Jeremy must have elected AA to receive  the items. I'm satisfied that she is telling the truth and she has gone out of her way to provide pictures to back up what she says. Some questions have been a bit personal and from past experience of these forums, it's always best not to say too much.

Posters can come across very aggressively sometimes when people with real life involvement in cases come to visit the forum.  I recall several individuals from the Madeleine McCann case joining us and being driven off by unnecessarily aggressive questioning.

Some restraint please and note the topic thanx.

[The General]

This is like an episode of The Archers - keep going guys - so who's husband did what now?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Posters can come across very aggressively sometimes when people with real life involvement in cases come to visit the forum.  I recall several individuals from the Madeleine McCann case joining us and being driven off by unnecessarily aggressive questioning.

Some restraint please and note the topic thanx.

But John, Aunt Agatha’s only “real life” involvement with Jeremy Bamber is that she wrote to him in prison in 1993 and became a pen pal, with some phone calls and visits.

She had no real life involvement in the case at all.

And everything she says is just her opinion based on whatever the pathological liar, Jeremy Bamber has told her. There’s several people on here who have had direct contact with him by way of written letters, and possibly more, but they don’t claim to have real life involvement in the case. Even the people who DID have real life involvement with him back in 1985 have said how deceptive and eerie he was, and the two people who probably DID know him better than anyone else, and certainly anyone on here — Brett Collins and Julie Mugford — have both said he’s guilty.

I know nothing about Agatha at all, but she has contradicted herself so may times; and in my view she’s come out with claims that I find hard to believe because they seem so implausible. I’m sure she’s a sweet person, which begs the question: why did Jeremy Bamber force her out? He either grew bored or realised she was of no use to him anymore. But either way, if he really did give her these items (and I still find the whole thing strange, especially the gun), but if he gave her that ponytail of his, which is something a lover or loved one would do, and she also claims he’s the Godfather to her children (how that happened hasn’t been explained...I’ve never been to a Christening & seen a Godparent turn up in a prison van & hold the baby whilst wearing handcuffs), it sounds like they were very close. Yet he’s frozen her out...given her details to Mike Tesko...and hasn’t been in contact with her for years.

So the huge lock of hair, Godfather story, the wetsuit, gun, watches, box etc...all these (if it’s true) clearly meant nothing to him, and he used the hair and box to manipulate her.