Question about Nevill's watch

[Aunt Agatha]

Quality watches don’t perish, Myster.

I personally don’t care if it’s a fake or genuine, but having checked the Carrie site and hw to distinguish between a genuine and fake one, I’m believing them.

They insist there’s always a model number on the back, including a serial number containing six digits and two letters.

Besides all that, I’ve never seen such a dreadful looking watch, ever. And if it’s been sat in a box for 30 years it would be exactly as it was back then.

If it was genuine, JB would have a lot of explaining to do where he got the money from to but not one, but two — the one he gave to his ex. But unless I saw certification and definite proof I’m choosing to believe Cartier that this pice off tat is a bad fake

When I say a box, neither a watch box or granny's box, just a box along with other stuff. I never wrapped it, covered it etc, I put it away in the loft and it stayed there for years.

You already have all this info. Read posts carefully and you might come to the correct conclusion.  Fake info will give a fake result!!

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I believe many individuals support him from all walks of life. Of course he has many detractors too.

On Twitter he only has Trudie Benjamin regularly posting and she seldom gets any responses, not even likes.

She and her “team” regularly tag Priti Patel for help, and she never acknowledges the little group....

They certainly have thick skin to be constantly rejected, ignored, and derided for supporting the mass murderer, Jeremy Bamber, but keep banging on. Gosh, he’s spending his fifth decade in prison now...you'd think they’d know they’re flogging a dead horse by now. The evidence against him was overwhelming, and nothing’s changed. They certainly have a lot of steel!

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Do you really believe that DE article?

He said it live on camera from New Zealand in February just gone.

He was talking to GMTV standing by a bridge where one of the presenter’s, I think it was Kate said how he’d be interviewed the next day to say why he believed Jeremy Bamber was guilty. He said a few words in agreement, but I missed the interview the next day so never saw it.

However, he’s adamant JB is guilty.

[Nicholas]

Quality watches don’t perish, Myster.

I personally don’t care if it’s a fake or genuine, but having checked the Cartier site and how to distinguish between a genuine and fake one, I’m believing them.

They insist there’s always a model number on the back, including a serial number containing six digits and two letters.

Besides all that, I’ve never seen such a dreadful looking watch, ever. And if it’s been sat in a box for 30 years it would be exactly as it was back then.

If it was genuine, JB would have a lot of explaining to do where he got the money from to buy not one, but two — the one he gave to his ex. But unless I saw certification and definite proof I’m choosing to believe Cartier that this piece of tat is a bad fake

Agreed

[Nicholas]

He claimed Sheila punched one of the twins when the whole family were in the car!

He’s an evil rotten liar.

Appears he did so to smear her name

[ISpyWithMyEye]

When I say a box, neither a watch box or granny's box, just a box along with other stuff. I never wrapped it, covered it etc, I put it away in the loft and it stayed there for years.

You already have all this info. Read posts carefully and you might come to the correct conclusion.  Fake info will give a fake result!!

e author=Aunt Agatha link=topic=9666.msg583876#msg583876 date=1587047939]

When I say a box, neither a watch box or granny's box, just a box along with other stuff. I never wrapped it, covered it etc, I put it away in the loft and it stayed there for years.

You already have all this info. Read posts carefully and you might come to the correct conclusion.  Fake info will give a fake result!!
[/quote]


So you must have put the Cartier in a box then, Agatha? You’ve posted it up inside a watch box.

You’re right, fake information throws up fake results.

You said more than once before posting the picture of the Cartier watch that you DIDN’T have a Cartier watch belonging to Jeremy. So you’re both right and wrong. You’re right in that I read posts carefully, and you’re wrong that I come to incorrect conclusions: I went by what YOU said. You said “I do not have a Cartier watch of Jeremy’s”, despite previously — and SINCE — claiming you do.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

When I replied to your post last night Caroline I was half asleep and didn't recognise you wrote Cartier.
I do not have a Cartier watch of Jeremy's, I have a genuine omega and what could be a fake role.
I have two seiko watches of his also, which I purchased for him some 25yrs ago.
I apologise for the confusion.

I can’t post pictures — again

No idea why...

So I’ve pulled this down, Agatha

In your post you state: “I do not have a Cartier watch of Jeremy’s “

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Appears he did so to smear her name

Of course he did, he’s utterly vile.

Sheila never, ever laid one finger on her boys. And as if she’d PUNCH one in their face with June & Nevill sat in the front of the car & Jeremy sat next to her! He’s mad.

He’s trying to make her out to have been a beefy, aggressive maniac. A child batterer. He’s absolutely putrid.

What’s more, if a small six-year-old was punched in the face by an adult they’d possibly have a broken nose or/and black eye. Sheila must have had a very weak punch, eh?!

Honestly, the evil lies that piece of dirt spouts is sickening. No wonder they increased his sentenced to Life with no Parole.

[Aunt Agatha]

e author=Aunt Agatha link=topic=9666.msg583876#msg583876 date=1587047939]

When I say a box, neither a watch box or granny's box, just a box along with other stuff. I never wrapped it, covered it etc, I put it away in the loft and it stayed there for years.

You already have all this info. Read posts carefully and you might come to the correct conclusion.  Fake info will give a fake result!!



So you must have put the Cartier in a box then, Agatha? You’ve posted it up inside a watch box.

You’re right, fake information throws up fake results.

You said more than once before posting the picture of the Cartier watch that you DIDN’T have a Cartier watch belonging to Jeremy. So you’re both right and wrong. You’re right in that I read posts carefully, and you’re wrong that I come to incorrect conclusions: I went by what YOU said. You said “I do not have a Cartier watch of Jeremy’s”, despite previously — and SINCE — claiming you do.

You really do read what you want, perceive it how you want then deliberately misguide readers on here.

You are aware, having looked at the watch for the first time in years (having forgot all about it) I read the post on here and decided to look for it, remember,  that I said I had mistakenly stated I had an omega.... It was not an omega it was a Cartier!
I apologised for my error and posted pictures of the watch as you suggested I had taken a photo from the Internet.

I put the watch into a box only a few days ago.... Its not a Cartier box, I never stated I had a Cartier box. Just a Cartier watch.

[Nicholas]

In addition, Mike never even knew I existed until he found the paperwork!

Why didn’t Bamber want Mike to know about your existence?

[Nicholas]

Must I really explain?

Spy stated in the post that Jeremy had told me he didn't like his grandmother and that I had posted as such.

Again, I have never stated such a thing and would like her to show us all we're that information came from.

Could you have made the alleged comment years ago & have forgotten?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

When I say a box, neither a watch box or granny's box, just a box along with other stuff. I never wrapped it, covered it etc, I put it away in the loft and it stayed there for years.

You already have all this info. Read posts carefully and you might come to the correct conclusion.  Fake info will give a fake result!!

It’s in a watch box in one of your pictures, Agatha...

[Aunt Agatha]

I've just stated, I found the watch, put it in a watch box and photo'd it!  What part of that do you not understand?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

You really do read what you want, perceive it how you want then deliberately misguide readers on here.

You are aware, having looked at the watch for the first time in years (having forgot all about it) I read the post on here and decided to look for it, remember,  that I said I had mistakenly stated I had an omega.... It was not an omega it was a Cartier!
I apologised for my error and posted pictures of the watch as you suggested I had taken a photo from the Internet.

I put the watch into a box only a few days ago.... Its not a Cartier box, I never stated I had a Cartier box. Just a Cartier watch.

I’m more confused now, Agatha

I do apologise

Are you saying the photo you posted was from the internet?

I’ve made bold your sentence, but in case it doesn’t work this is what you wrote:

“I apologised for my error and posted pictures of the watch as you suggested I had taken from the internet”

I don’t recall suggesting you take photos from the internet?

[Aunt Agatha]

Why didn’t Bamber want Mike to know about your existence?

I've never suggested that Jeremy DIDN'T WANT MIKE TO KNOW ABOUT ME!

Jeremy has a private life and not everything is for the public domain.