The thread title is: "What if Mrs Fenn had called the police the night of the crying?"
A good question, but perhaps an equally good question would be: "Why on earth didn't she call the police on the night of the crying?"
And it also seems she contacted no-one else at all, except her friend Edna Glyn. It is likely that Mrs Fenn, as most old people do, would have had a list of emergency numbers to hand by her 'phone - police, fire, ambulance, Ocean Club reception etc.
Yet she only spoke to Edna Glyn, about which we glean only this:
Quote from Mrs Fenn statement: "That night she contacted a friend called EDNA GLYN, who also lives in Praia da Luz, after 23.00, telling her about the situation, who was not surprised at the child's crying".
And that's all! So it seems that Mrs Fenn was chatting to her friend, a child frantically crying 'Daddy! Daddy!' ever more loudly in the background...then Mrs Fenn reported it to Mrs Glyn...Mrs Glyn said: "I'm not surprised!, and...er...that's it? Did neither of them think that someone should be contacted?
But I wanted to raise one more issue which as yet has only been mentioned once on the thread, and that is this peculiar statement from Mrs Fenn:
QUOTE: "...at approximately 22.30 she heard a child cry, and that due the tone of the crying seemed to be a young child and not a baby of two years of age or younger".
Now, firstly, that statement is ambiguous. Something may have been lost in translation. But reading it as I think it's meant to be taken, it seems that she's telling the PJ: "I heard this child crying. It didn't sound like a child of 2 (which I take to mean younger than 3). The child sounded if it was over 2 (i.e. at least three years old)".
I admit I am male, and maybe females are better at this sort of thing. But I have heard a great number of crying children in my time. I suggest it would be very hard to distinguish between the crying of a 2-year-old and a 3-year-old child.
Can anyone explain why Mrs Fenn should be so very specific about the crying being from a 3-year-old and not a 2-year-old?
I can't account for it.
If she had said: "It was a young child, not a baby", that would be understandable.
Instead of which we have a convoluted statement that the child was: "not a baby of two years of age or younger".
So that is two question marks about Mrs Fenn's evidence: 1 Why didn't she get help from the police or the Ocean Club? 2. Why is she so insistent that the crying was not "from a baby of two years of age or younger"?