Author Topic: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.  (Read 16367 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Myster

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #90 on: July 18, 2018, 06:06:55 PM »
Was blood found on the coal scuttle?  I don't recall reading anything to this effect?

Can you not spotify it in the photo?  If we can see it now, so did they then.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #91 on: July 18, 2018, 06:29:51 PM »
Can you not spotify it in the photo?  If we can see it now, so did they then.

Possibly, but then I would feel a bit bare around the bottom! 

Is there an image of the coal scuttle with blood stains? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #92 on: July 18, 2018, 06:33:31 PM »
Was blood found on the coal scuttle?  I don't recall reading anything to this effect?

Yes, a lot.

Offline Myster

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #93 on: July 18, 2018, 06:46:50 PM »
Possibly, but then I would feel a bit bare around the bottom! 

Is there an image of the coal scuttle with blood stains?

Not any that I've seen. Caro might have, as she's seen more than most, poor gal!

I think Cook removed it along with other evidence days after the murders.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Caroline

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #94 on: July 18, 2018, 07:05:55 PM »
I can't post the picture that I have because I promised I never would. However attached is a picture of the coal scuttle, all of the dark trails are blood.

Offline Myster

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #95 on: July 18, 2018, 07:11:08 PM »
I remember reading that under certain circumstances, such as in high temperatures (hot kitchen) and stressful encounters (the violent assault which Nevill was subject to), a phenomenon called instantaneous rigor or cadaveric spasm might have occurred which resulted in that precariously balanced position he was found in, despite being partially supported by the back wall as Caroline stated.

Usually affects (not effects!) smaller muscle groups, e.g. hands, but in this case could possibly have involved upper and lower leg muscles as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadaveric_spasm
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #96 on: July 19, 2018, 09:18:24 AM »
Not any that I've seen. Caro might have, as she's seen more than most, poor gal!

I think Cook removed it along with other evidence days after the murders.

I can't recall it being mentioned in any docs eg DC Hammersley's trial testimony where he goes through most of the exhibits seized from soc or any of the docs from FSS eg John Hayward's blood sampling tests.  I guess it was assumed the blood stains originated from NB and I can't think of any reason to doubt this. 

Dr Vanezis is asked about marks to NB's head from the scuttle which he refers to as "artifacts" but confirms there were no injuries as such, perhaps suggestive that his head arrived in that position on the scuttle without force.     

Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #97 on: July 19, 2018, 09:24:44 AM »
I can't post the picture that I have because I promised I never would. However attached is a picture of the coal scuttle, all of the dark trails are blood.

Thanks.  I'm assuming those dark trails are definitely blood stains and not coal dust stains caused maybe by the scuttle forming condensation on the outside from the Aga/heat/cooking and then forming dark liquid trails? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #98 on: July 19, 2018, 12:28:27 PM »
Thanks.  I'm assuming those dark trails are definitely blood stains and not coal dust stains caused maybe by the scuttle forming condensation on the outside from the Aga/heat/cooking and then forming dark liquid trails?

It id DEFINEITELY blood.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #99 on: July 19, 2018, 02:53:27 PM »
It id DEFINEITELY blood.

Oh so what's your thinking?  How did NB's head end up there?  How does it implicate JB?

I can't really make any sense out of the silhouetted image.

This is from Dr V's TT:

Q:  On the left hand side---I should make it clear that as part of the post mortem you shaved the victim's head.

A:  That is right.

Q:  On the left hand side of 6 there are two lines going along, what are they?

A:  These are artefacts produced by pressure from the coal scuttle where the deceased was found but nothing to do with any injuries.

So it seems from above NB's head was placed there or somehow landed gently otherwise I guess bruising/grazing might be expected if his landed with a thump on the rim of the scuttle?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #100 on: July 19, 2018, 09:23:30 PM »
Oh so what's your thinking?  How did NB's head end up there?  How does it implicate JB?

I can't really make any sense out of the silhouetted image.

This is from Dr V's TT:

Q:  On the left hand side---I should make it clear that as part of the post mortem you shaved the victim's head.

A:  That is right.

Q:  On the left hand side of 6 there are two lines going along, what are they?

A:  These are artefacts produced by pressure from the coal scuttle where the deceased was found but nothing to do with any injuries.

So it seems from above NB's head was placed there or somehow landed gently otherwise I guess bruising/grazing might be expected if his landed with a thump on the rim of the scuttle?

I think it was placed there and his body wasn't moved because hypostasis was consistent with the position at the scene.

Offline adam

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #101 on: July 19, 2018, 10:58:45 PM »
Oh so what's your thinking?  How did NB's head end up there?  How does it implicate JB?

I can't really make any sense out of the silhouetted image.

This is from Dr V's TT:

Q:  On the left hand side---I should make it clear that as part of the post mortem you shaved the victim's head.

A:  That is right.

Q:  On the left hand side of 6 there are two lines going along, what are they?

A:  These are artefacts produced by pressure from the coal scuttle where the deceased was found but nothing to do with any injuries.

So it seems from above NB's head was placed there or somehow landed gently otherwise I guess bruising/grazing might be expected if his landed with a thump on the rim of the scuttle?

That is correct.

Nevill falling forward or backwards due to Bamber's rifle blows would land on the floor. Either falling backwards or forwards to land face first or on his back on the floor.

There is a small chance he would land on the table. But not on a chair or kneeling into a lightwwight coal scuttle. He was too heavy to do either.

Bamber lifted Nevill onto the coal scuttle to have full shooting & burning access to Nevill's head & bare back.

Offline John

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #102 on: July 20, 2018, 10:12:44 AM »
I wonder who placed the seat cushion from the overturned chair on the floor beside the Aga?   Could this have been done to stem the spread of blood across the floor by a killer who intended to live in that house afterwards?


A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Caroline

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #103 on: July 20, 2018, 01:03:23 PM »
I wonder who placed the seat cushion from the overturned chair on the floor beside the Aga?   Could this have been done to stem the spread of blood across the floor by a killer who intended to live in that house afterwards?



Actually John, that cushion isn't from the overturned chair. The cushion from that chair was on the floor near the blue plastic swing bin.

Offline John

Re: Prof Knight's Trial Testimony Re Marks to NB's back.
« Reply #104 on: July 20, 2018, 03:09:21 PM »


Actually John, that cushion isn't from the overturned chair. The cushion from that chair was on the floor near the blue plastic swing bin.

Are we to assume that the way the cushions were set out post incident was the same as they were prior to the killing, ie blue cushions at one end of the table and red ones at the other end?

A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.