The videos were accepted at face value, I have not previously viewed many of them to my knowledge so I have no axe to grind with them as such. The problem arises where they contain material which has been shown to be false and misleading contrary to the PJ investigation.
Speculation in relation to the McCann's credibility can always be allowed as long as there is evidence to back it up but quoting false information and showing newspaper front pages which also contain erroneous headlines purely in order to generate sensationalism is unacceptable. A good example of this would be the two below.
Including these headlines in a video is wrong as they are both incorrect. There is no forensic evidence which puts the parents in the frame or has determined that Madeleine's blood was in the hire car. Both these headlines are LIES.
All that has been asked of HiDeHo is that she reviews the videos and removes any material which is false.
Is there any point in having videos which contain falsehoods or which allude to guilt where there is no evidence to back this up?