Author Topic: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?  (Read 3960 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #150 on: June 19, 2021, 11:09:49 PM »
Police officers named John Canaan as the man they believe abducted and murdered Suzy Lamplugh.  Has he taken his case to the ECHR yet because of his human rights breach?

Offline Eleanor

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #151 on: June 19, 2021, 11:27:58 PM »
Its the fact that the crime is Murder and CB is german.

So if it wasn't Murder then The Germans couldn't do this?

I shall say no more.

Offline Davel

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #152 on: June 19, 2021, 11:30:55 PM »
So if it wasn't Murder then The Germans couldn't do this?

I shall say no more.

It applies to sexual offences too.. But thsts about. It.
Thsts why the UK  was able to convict Gary Glitter for crimes abroad

Offline Eleanor

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #153 on: June 19, 2021, 11:42:31 PM »
It applies to sexual offences too.. But thsts about. It.
Thsts why the UK  was able to convict Gary Glitter for crimes abroad

Are you telling me that unless the Germans go for murder or sexual  abuse then they can't do anything to this man?

This is only important in so far as I understand The Law.

Offline Davel

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #154 on: June 19, 2021, 11:47:53 PM »
Are you telling me that unless the Germans go for murder or sexual  abuse then they can't do anything to this man?

This is only important in so far as I understand The Law.

Only certain crimes give the Germans jurisdiction... Thats about it.

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #155 on: June 19, 2021, 11:52:13 PM »
Police officers named John Canaan as the man they believe abducted and murdered Suzy Lamplugh.  Has he taken his case to the ECHR yet because of his human rights breach?

Did they?
England - good effort

Offline Brietta

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #156 on: June 20, 2021, 12:18:31 AM »
Did they?

Why do you think they didn't.


Estate agent Miss Lamplugh was declared dead, presumed murdered, after going missing in July 1986 at the age of 25.

In 2002, police named John Cannan as their prime suspect.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-56400140
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #157 on: June 20, 2021, 07:17:27 AM »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #158 on: June 20, 2021, 07:22:38 AM »
Sound familiar?

“In November 2002, Cannan complained via his solicitors about the police publicly naming him, saying he was "devastated and distressed". He again denied killing Lamplugh.[5] His solicitor complained about a lack of presumption of innocence and that the prison service had withheld letters Cannan had tried to send to national newspapers regarding the allegations”.[28]

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #159 on: June 20, 2021, 07:39:28 AM »

If John Canaan is guilty then why hasn't he been arrested?
Free Martin Brueckner

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #160 on: June 20, 2021, 08:05:20 AM »
If John Canaan is guilty then why hasn't he been arrested?
Because circumstantial evidence (even strong circumstantial evidence) isn’t usually enough to guarantee a conviction.  I expect you believe him innocent,  not just of Suzy’s disappearance but of all his other convictions for rape and murder.  YAWN.

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #161 on: June 20, 2021, 08:29:00 AM »
Sound familiar?

“In November 2002, Cannan complained via his solicitors about the police publicly naming him, saying he was "devastated and distressed". He again denied killing Lamplugh.[5] His solicitor complained about a lack of presumption of innocence and that the prison service had withheld letters Cannan had tried to send to national newspapers regarding the allegations”.[28]

He has brought at least one civil action against the authorities for breaching his human rights.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/suzy-lamplugh-murder-suspect-john-15495812
England - good effort

Offline Davel

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #162 on: June 20, 2021, 08:34:22 AM »
He has brought at least one civil action against the authorities for breaching his human rights.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/suzy-lamplugh-murder-suspect-john-15495812

Have you read the article... Its for prison conditions and does not support your argument

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #163 on: June 20, 2021, 08:57:22 AM »
Have you read the article... Its for prison conditions and does not support your argument

Our understanding of the article's meaning clearly differs.
England - good effort

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: So what exactly is Wolters sure about?
« Reply #164 on: June 20, 2021, 09:03:12 AM »
Because circumstantial evidence (even strong circumstantial evidence) isn’t usually enough to guarantee a conviction.  I expect you believe him innocent,  not just of Suzy’s disappearance but of all his other convictions for rape and murder.  YAWN.

Of course I think he is innocent of involvement of Suzy's disappearance.

He hasn't been found guilty.
Free Martin Brueckner