The futility in thrown up previous MOJ as weight against this case - It proves nothing, other than they do and have happened. That factually and lawfully convicted murderers cause problems for those that are genuine by abusing the system. As we see with the Mitchell case.
That this abuse has been continued with their once family friend - with the questions they concocted together. By way of trawling the internet to spread their word, by way of the book which the doc was largely based upon. By way of half truths, blatant misrepresentation of the facts and of course downright lies. - Which are if nothing else, completely ironic to also be claiming to be seeking truth? (cough) and Justice (cough). By using the name of this poor girl who lost her life at the hands of this murderer, to blatantly using that false premise of "The true story of the murder of Jodi Jones".
To further clarify that ALL that his person has ever had is: The defence built up by his first legal team. The hard graft those professionals put together. That even they did not keep EVERY part of every statement they chose excerpts from. That this person has never had every statement of anyone bar LM. A clear example of this is AB.
When one jumps from the first statement given on the 1st of July to then claim the next was four weeks later. It was not. It is these that DF sought to keep, to use in his cross examination of the witness.
To further these claims of having all on this case - by stating that evidence was hidden/buried from the defence. No, it simply was not used, it was not evidence that held any merit in their defence. For unlike this person, they did have access to everything. To go over everything to built up that proper defence from it. No mystery man - a false trail. It does not matter about the Jigsaw getting put together in that 7 month period of the calm before the storm. No positive sightings of Jodi, again it was not part of the Jigsaw - it was a false trail.
The alibi of SK - The physical copy of his fathers statement. That clear manipulation of using the absence of this to claim he had only been alibied by his girlfriend. To then claim it was not known to the defence? Which either highlights blatant lies, or tells us yet again of how little this person has actually had? Of both the statements and precognitions from both these witnesses.
And onto yet again the search trio. You are spot on. It was their evidence that played a vital part in showing LM was lying. That almost 99% of his lies were around this search trio walking some distance passed the V. To then claim and further clarify. That they were parallel to where Jodi lay on the wood side when his dog was up against the wall. He could not have been clearer in his intent, for he drew a diagram to show exactly where he said they were. That the search trio were from the off telling the truth.
And that this dog standing up at the V could have been reacting to anything in the woods. A rabbit, fox or even something left by Mitchell at the V? We will never know. But what it was not doing is leading LM far less any other member to Jodi. That he had already looked into the woods. That he entered this wood at the first easiest opportunity. That he was as complete ease, he knew exactly where he was going. That in those mere seconds he took in the type of tree, the bobble, the clothing, shoes and all else. - Not the horror, just all of those other details. That only the killer could have known and the killer was Luke Mitchell. He and not his dog in his made up concoction of lies - led this girls family to her body, in less than 10mins.
People have seen through the many cracks, in turn have looked beyond the book and realised the garden path was not quite as inviting as first thought. It was literally not all it was cracked up to be?
