It's backed by plenty of evidence. The problem is opinions can be wrong and the alerts in this case seem to rely heavily on Grimes opinion. How do you think it was possible for Eddie to alert twice to a coconut fragnent. That raises sime serious questions imo
As I've said the evidence supports that the alerts in thus case were the result of a poorly thought out experiment. No wonder Harrison... As you confirmed.. Back tracked after the alerts.
The latest evidence I think will confirm Maddue did not die in the, apartment..... But imi Grime has, already had the value from what may well be quite bogus alerts. I dint think he did it deliberately... I think he just placed to much faith/belief in his and his digs abilities
I think he might have been demob happy in Luz.
New business.
Freedom from the constraints imposed by operating as part of team which had to adhere to professional standards.
The fact that the requirement for the cadaver dog's qualification to be regularly updated had been deliberately ignored is I think a bit of a warning shot.
The Jersey Review - Operation Rectangle - criticised Grime's deployment in fields beyond his qualifications. I think that is quite revealing also.
When has there been such emphasis before or since on working dogs and their handler when working a case. They seem to have had their own fan club established with the marketing slogan of "DOGS DON'T LIE". Why on earth should that ever have been thought appropriate.