Author Topic: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.  (Read 22755 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #150 on: March 03, 2025, 07:06:39 PM »
No, I dont suppose the report would be enough to set him free now, Vertigo!
But who knows what effect it would have had on the jury at the time?
The thing is, the police were obviously going to use the report at trial if it favoured LM guilt, they didn't spend a fortune flying to America for nothing!
Alas, the report didn't favour a guilty Luke, and obviously they were fearful of the effect it would have on the outcome of the case, hence the redaction! They obviously thought the report would have more of an effect than simply 'clutching at straws' , as you put it, Vertigo!
Not necessarily, they obviously didn’t use it because it didn’t support their case, there’s nothing unusual or sinister about that, in the same way that if the defence had submitted Mitchell to a slew of psychological tests which concluded he was a psychopath they almost certainly wouldn’t have presented those in court either.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #151 on: March 03, 2025, 07:27:54 PM »
Not necessarily, they obviously didn’t use it because it didn’t support their case, there’s nothing unusual or sinister about that, in the same way that if the defence had submitted Mitchell to a slew of psychological tests which concluded he was a psychopath they almost certainly wouldn’t have presented those in court either.
Wonder what Turngull thought of the FBI report, Vertigo?
Do you think the police even told him about it?
What about the Judge, was there any legal obligation to show him the FBI report?
Probably not! Knowing how the courts work! More theatre than good old fashioned bloody justice!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #152 on: March 03, 2025, 08:08:07 PM »
Wonder what Turngull thought of the FBI report, Vertigo?
Do you think the police even told him about it?
What about the Judge, was there any legal obligation to show him the FBI report?
Probably not! Knowing how the courts work! More theatre than good old fashioned bloody justice!
I don’t know why you’re so hung up on the report, it proves nothing but you seem determined to keep focusing on it so good luck, maybe someone else will come along to keep this conversation going but I’ve lost interest now. 

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #153 on: March 03, 2025, 08:52:51 PM »
I don’t know why you’re so hung up on the report, it proves nothing but you seem determined to keep focusing on it so good luck, maybe someone else will come along to keep this conversation going but I’ve lost interest now.
Understood, Vertigo!

Offline Chris_Halkides

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #154 on: March 04, 2025, 10:56:11 AM »
It is odd that the report was so heavily redacted; that made no sense whatsoever.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #155 on: March 04, 2025, 11:59:42 AM »
It is odd that the report was so heavily redacted; that made no sense whatsoever.
Do you know if the Defence saw the report Chris? As Peter seems to suggest!
Or was it sometime later, after the trial that the FBI report came to light?

Offline Moggrey21

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #156 on: March 04, 2025, 12:19:31 PM »
"joe bloggs" please at least TRY and not sound identical to that idiot Lean...you're embarrassing yourself. go drive your bus

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #157 on: March 04, 2025, 12:46:51 PM »
"joe bloggs" please at least TRY and not sound identical to that idiot Lean...you're embarrassing yourself. go drive your bus

I thought that I was Dr Lean?

It’s turning into Spartacus around here!
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Moggrey21

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #158 on: March 04, 2025, 01:21:05 PM »
people can have more than one account/username "FAITH"

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #159 on: March 04, 2025, 01:31:52 PM »
"joe bloggs" please at least TRY and not sound identical to that idiot Lean...you're embarrassing yourself. go drive your bus
That comment doesn't really add anything to the discussion, Moggrey!
Do you have anything to say regarding the FBI report?
Oh, and its one'g', 'Blogs' ! Thank you!

Offline Moggrey21

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #160 on: March 04, 2025, 01:45:06 PM »
God, you are one smug delusional individual Sandra. Toxic, i've heard many people say. Stick to driving your bus

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #161 on: March 04, 2025, 02:11:24 PM »
God, you are one smug delusional individual Sandra. Toxic, i've heard many people say. Stick to driving your bus
I'm not allowed to drive at the moment, Moggrey! Got a new hip recently!
« Last Edit: March 04, 2025, 02:21:09 PM by Joe Blogs »

Offline Moggrey21

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #162 on: March 04, 2025, 02:14:28 PM »
Do you mean "allowed" Sandra? Shocking who they let become Dr's these days....

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.
« Reply #163 on: March 04, 2025, 02:20:13 PM »
Do you mean "allowed" Sandra? Shocking who they let become Dr's these days....
Sorry, will amend!