is that it ? Is that the sum of new evidence?
As an ex copper you would think he would know better - an ex con says one thing - With no proof - and then JB says he is telling lies .
End of . Its hear say -
or even it could be a letter written by someone with a grudge - or perceived grudge.
anonymous letters - worth nothing unless they contain something that could be proved.
Hello Guinness. Lovely to see you on the forum again
This author/book appear very unprofessional imo.
As I've already stated those police officers the author claims to have interviewed are all now deceased and no attempt has been made to verify these meetings by way of photos or even date, time and venue.
A quote from a journalist, Stuart Philips, was freelance so again the reader has to accept the authors use of his material at face-value.
The author claims a chance meeting with the late Ed Lawson QC. Again no way of verifying the meeting and/or discussion used in the book.
The author also claims he attempted to track-down JB's friend Brett Collins in New Zealand. He claims he eventually received a phone call but by his own admission he is unable to confirm he was talking to the man himself. Obviously if BC turns up at a later date and states he never made such a call the author has his get out clause.
A lot of completely irrelevant information particularly with regard to JB's "disciples".
I can't imagine any reader of true crime rating this book anything other than very poor.
