Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[faithlilly]

MWT is not quite in the same league as you or me.

He gets paid for his opinion.

Ultimately the weight of EVIDENCE will decide regarding Brueckner - not a documaker's opinion or even that of armchair dicks such as us.

We shall see what the programme throws up and judge the evidence presented.

I do find it rather telling though that while you are quite willing to believe the words of Brueckner’s criminal friends, who themselves have admitted being involved in many criminal endeavours including people trafficking you seem rather reluctant to believe MWT’s evidence. Odd that.

[G-Unit]

HCW's word is either evidence that the Germans have good evidence that CB committed the crime or evidence that he is a very foolish man intent on ruining his own career and the reputation of the BKA.  Perhaps you disagree with the interpretation of the evidence but it is evidence nonetheless so to keep on asking "what evidence" is a bit goady imo.

You agree with me, then. The 'evidence' boils down to believing Wolters has the evidence he'll need to convict CB. Perhaps he has, but it I prefer to wait and see if he really does have enough.

[G-Unit]

We shall see what the programme throws up and judge the evidence presented.

I do find it rather telling though that while you are quite willing to believe the words of Brueckner’s criminal friends, who themselves have admitted being involved in many criminal endeavours including people trafficking you seem rather reluctant to believe MWT’s evidence. Odd that.

Whatever MWT has, it will be reported in Germany. That should ensure that this case will only be prosecuted with very strong evidence of guilt.

[Eleanor]

At what point in time of the evening in question was Breuckner 30 Minutes away?  The Phone Call was between 7.30pm and just after 8pm.  The alleged Abduction took place between 9pm and 10pm so plenty of time to get to Luz.

No one takes a phone call lasting 30 minutes on a phone that doesn't belong to them, unless it was an accomplice.

I am still not sure if Breuckner was involved but I continue to hope that Madeleine is still alive.  Possibly wishful thinking on my part.

However, as has been pointed out, Wolters is just a Prosecutor.  He isn't doing the investigating.

[faithlilly]

At what point in time of the evening in question was Breuckner 30 Minutes away?  The Phone Call was between 7.30pm and just after 8pm.  The alleged Abduction took place between 9pm and 10pm so plenty of time to get to Luz.

No one takes a phone call lasting 30 minutes on a phone that doesn't belong to them, unless it was an accomplice.

I am still not sure if Breuckner was involved but I continue to hope that Madeleine is still alive.  Possibly wishful thinking on my part.

However, as has been pointed out, Wolters is just a Prosecutor.  He isn't doing the investigating.

He does appear to be a bit of a glory hunter though. He turns up everywhere…obscure podcasts, television programmes…the opening of fetes ( well maybe not the last one but give him time). What is he hoping to achieve?

[Mr Gray]

We shall see what the programme throws up and judge the evidence presented.

I do find it rather telling though that while you are quite willing to believe the words of Brueckner’s criminal friends, who themselves have admitted being involved in many criminal endeavours including people trafficking you seem rather reluctant to believe MWT’s evidence. Odd that.

It isn't odd at all because we haven't heard from MWT himself.
I'm opeinded.. Let's see what he has to say.

[jassi]

Whatever MWT has, it will be reported in Germany. That should ensure that this case will only be prosecuted with very strong evidence of guilt.

I was going to say something similar.
Brueckner's defence team will be all over this/ whatever it is, and will ensure that it is not just dismissed out of hand as being 'unhelpful'

[Mr Gray]

You agree with me, then. The 'evidence' boils down to believing Wolters has the evidence he'll need to convict CB. Perhaps he has, but it I prefer to wait and see if he really does have enough.

If Wolters said he had photographic evidence of abuse of Mafdie post 3/5/07 would you think that significant or would you say it's only words.  This question destroys your argument and I would say you don't have an answer

[Eleanor]

Portuguese Law.  British Law.  And now German Law.  And even European Law varies from State to State.  But here in France they do trawl for more evidence if they think there could be some.  And they do get a few nutters turning up.  So I very much doubt that Wolters has broken The Law.

[Brietta]

I would appreciate it if you could manage to interact with a better attitude.

Having said that, my point is that it's not possible, imo, for Davel to reach conclusions based on evidence other than the words of Hans Christian Wolters. As you yourself have admitted, any evidence gathered by the Germans is confidential.

That is a good start towards eliminating the perennial caterwauling.  You do concede that there is evidence unlike your goading post which initiated this exchange of the blatantly obvious.

[faithlilly]

If Wolters said he had photographic evidence of abuse of Mafdie post 3/5/07 would you think that significant or would you say it's only words.  This question destroys your argument sd I would say you don't have an answer

Has he said that photographic evidence exists?

[jassi]

Portuguese Law.  British Law.  And now German Law.  And even European Law varies from State to State.  But here in France they do trawl for more evidence if they think there could be some.  And they do get a few nutters turning up. So I very much doubt that Wolters has broken The Law.

I don't see that as of particular concern, though it might invalidate any trial.
The issue is does he really have strong enough evidence to ensure a trial or is it just wishful thinking.

[Venturi Swirl]

You agree with me, then. The 'evidence' boils down to believing Wolters has the evidence he'll need to convict CB. Perhaps he has, but it I prefer to wait and see if he really does have enough.

I'm still not entirely sure you understand the meaning of the word evidence.

[Venturi Swirl]

We shall see what the programme throws up and judge the evidence presented.

I do find it rather telling though that while you are quite willing to believe the words of Brueckner’s criminal friends, who themselves have admitted being involved in many criminal endeavours including people trafficking you seem rather reluctant to believe MWT’s evidence. Odd that.

Where do think MWT's evidence will be coming from wrt to a potential alibi for CB?  Little Lord Fauntleroy, George Washington and Mother Theresa?

[G-Unit]

If Wolters said he had photographic evidence of abuse of Mafdie post 3/5/07 would you think that significant or would you say it's only words.  This question destroys your argument and I would say you don't have an answer

Has Wolters said that? If he did I would still prefer to wait for him to produce it.

Mr Wolters said they have no idea how she died and no DNA or photo evidence linking the German sex offender to the alleged murder.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-prosecutor-100-convinced-25173564