Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Venturi Swirl]

I think it's the most probable evidence Wolters is referring to. Hrs explained why he hasn't divulged it.

Thetrs a forum called Websleuths.. Where several quite bright people post... And the photo theory is quite popular there

I know, I look at it often, I still don't think it's likely for the reasons I've already given.  I suppose it's possible that the McCanns and the Met are aware of such visual evidence and are playing dumb on German instructions but I doubt it.

[Wonderfulspam]

I think it's the most probable evidence Wolters is referring to. Hrs explained why he hasn't divulged it.

Thetrs a forum called Websleuths.. Where several quite bright people post... And the photo theory is quite popular there

Is that the same bright people who believe Brueckner abducted Joana?

[Mr Gray]

I know, I look at it often, I still don't think it's likely for the reasons I've already given.  I suppose it's possible that the McCanns and the Met are aware of such visual evidence and are playing dumb on German instructions but I doubt it.

I think it may well be... For the reasons I've given

[faithlilly]

I think it may well be... For the reasons I've given

Your reason seems to be based solely on what Wolters said on the Discovery documentary. I have shown that you have misinterpreted what he said. Do you have any other ‘evidence’ revealed by him?

[Mr Gray]

Your reason seems to be based solely on what Wolters said on the Discovery documentary. I have shown that you have misinterpreted what he said. Do you have any other ‘evidence’ revealed by him?

You have shown nothing. Try to keep to the truth if you can.
So now you accept you were wrong and Wolters said the evidence could be photo,, video... On the discovery channel..
He was quite clear

[faithlilly]

You have shown nothing. Try to keep to the truth if you can.
So now you accept you were wrong and Wolters said the evidence could be photo,, video... On the discovery channel..
He was quite clear

This is what you posted.

‘Wolters has made several statements to suggest that is, what he has’

He has suggested nothing of the sort.

[Eleanor]

Is that the same bright people who believe Brueckner abducted Joana?

This is certainly a possibility.  IMO.

[G-Unit]

You have shown nothing. Try to keep to the truth if you can.
So now you accept you were wrong and Wolters said the evidence could be photo,, video... On the discovery channel..
He was quite clear

I think you're misinterpreting Faith's posts. Where does she say she accepts she was wrong? I understood her to be saying you were wrong.

[Mr Gray]

I think you're misinterpreting Faith's posts. Where does she say she accepts she was wrong? I understood her to be saying you were wrong.

I don't think she knows what she's talking about herself

[Mr Gray]

This is what you posted.

‘Wolters has made several statements to suggest that is, what he has’

He has suggested nothing of the sort.

He's actually used the words photo and video in the discovery programme.. Suggesting this is what his evidence is

[Wonderfulspam]

This is certainly a possibility.  IMO.

So you're calling Leonor a liar?

[Eleanor]

So you're calling Leonor a liar?

Nope.  I'm calling her a victim.

[Wonderfulspam]

Nope.  I'm calling her a victim.

Well, you're quite wrong about that, because she's a convicted child murderer.

[faithlilly]

I don't think she knows what she's talking about herself

.

It’s Wolters words I posted. You are simply misrepresenting them.

[Wonderfulspam]

MWT thinks the Ciprianos are innocent too.

I'm surprised he hasn't spotted the obvious link with Brueckner.

Maybe, given time, if there's profit to be made from it, he'll start believing that next.