Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Eleanor]

Well, you're quite wrong about that, because she's a convicted child murderer.

I'm still calling her a victim after seeing the state of her face and body.

[Wonderfulspam]

I'm still calling her a victim after seeing the state of her face and body.

You should see the state of my wife when she's answered me back.

[faithlilly]

He's actually used the words photo and video in the discovery programme.. Suggesting this is what his evidence is

No, what the evidence COULD BE…that is a subtle but very important difference.

[Eleanor]

You should see the state of my wife when she's answered me back.

I would rather see the state of you.

[Mr Gray]

.

It’s Wolters words I posted. You are simply misrepresenting them.

So when. Wolters says his evidence could be witness statements.. Photos.. Videos... You don't think he's suggesting that's what it is.

I'm not saying it is... But he has mada a suggestion

[Venturi Swirl]

I would rather see the state of you.

As if Spam has a wife.  I doubt he’s been to first base with a girl yet.

[Eleanor]

As if Spam has a wife.  I doubt he’s been to first base with a girl yet.

Exactement.

[faithlilly]

So when. Wolters says his evidence could be witness statements.. Photos.. Videos... You don't think he's suggesting that's what it is.

I'm not saying it is... But he has mada a suggestion

No, I think that he’s putting forward a list of possible evidence.

Wolters says himself: “ I CAN’T SAY WHAT KIND OF EVIDENCE WE HAVE”

[Mr Gray]

No, what the evidence COULD BE…that is a subtle but very important difference.

Difference to what... Saying it is.
I've never claimed he has, said what it is
As, I recall he's appealed for information re then interiors of houses CB had access to.  That again suggests he has photo.. Video evidence of a room he wants to match to

[Mr Gray]

No, I think that he’s putting forward a list of possible evidence.

Wolters says himself: “ I CAN’T SAY WHAT KIND OF EVIDENCE WE HAVE”

A list.. Two possibilities.. That's all.
He's suggested photo.. Video.. As a possibility ..
He can't say what it is because it's confidential

[faithlilly]

Difference to what... Saying it is.
I've never claimed he has, said what it is
As, I recall he's appealed for information re then interiors of houses CB had access to.  That again suggests he has photo.. Video evidence of a room he wants to match to

I’m afraid you’re simply making things up now.

I posted Wolters words. I’d be obliged if you are claiming that Wolters said something you do the same.

[faithlilly]

A list.. Two possibilities.. That's all.
He's suggested photo.. Video.. As a possibility ..
He can't say what it is because it's confidential

Yes…possibilities…not probabilities.

[Mr Gray]

Yes…possibilities…not probabilities.

So after all that you accept that, Wolters has specifically raised photo.. Video..as possible evidence

[G-Unit]

He's actually used the words photo and video in the discovery programme.. Suggesting this is what his evidence is

He says it COULD BE witnesses, videos or photos. You are interpreting 'Could be' as 'is'.

[Venturi Swirl]

He says it COULD BE witnesses, videos or photos. You are interpreting 'Could be' as 'is'.

No he isn’t.