Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[faithlilly]

You don't have access to or any knowledge of, Wolters employment history, track record for honesty, prosecution success rate & what he gets up to in the bedroom though.

I’ve made the same point myself in the past.

While it appears that some are quite willing to, metaphorically, trawl through Amaral’s bins, they seem strangely reluctant to do the same with Wolters.

[Mr Gray]

Sigh.  Here we go round the Mulberry Bush. Again.

[Venturi Swirl]

I’ve made the same point myself in the past.

While it appears that some are quite willing to, metaphorically, trawl through Amaral’s bins, they seem strangely reluctant to do the same with Wolters.

Some people don't seem to understand the term "the benefit of the doubt", nor the difference in terms of reputation between a convicted rapist / paedophile and a currently employed public prosecutor.  If there are bins to be trawled through as far as HCW is concerned, trawl away!  I'm sure attempts have already been made to find some dirt on him, as I'm sure there have been years of concerted but unsuccessful effort to dig up the dirt on the McCanns.  What's stopping you Faith?  Dig it up and it may well change our opinion. 

[G-Unit]

Which evidence in this case do you have trust in, out of interest?

I'm not discussing having trust in evidence, I'm discussing trust in people who say they have evidence.

[The General]

Where’s the independent evidence that supports your assertion?

It's legal fact.

[Mr Gray]

I'm not discussing having trust in evidence, I'm discussing trust in people who say they have evidence.

Eolyers statement is evidence... It's quite obvious you cannot see thst.  It isvas much evidence as any other witness statement.  He says he has seen something that makes him 100% sure Maddie had been murdered by CB. You dint have to believe him.. But his statement is evidence

[Wonderfulspam]

No you're not - you don't know what the evidence is.

Your honour, the prosecution presents exhibit 42DD: The things I have said to media outlets.

[barrier]

Eolyers statement is evidence... It's quite obvious you cannot see thst.  It isvas much evidence as any other witness statement.  He says he has seen something that makes him 100% sure Maddie had been murdered by CB. You dint have to believe him.. But his statement is evidence

His statement is evidence he said it, its not evidence of the actual fact of him (CB) killing the girl.

[The General]

Your honour, the prosecution presents exhibit 42DD: The things I have said to media outlets.

....over the course of 20 months and essentially compromised the investigation by going public in a futile attempt to flush out an accomplice.

[Wonderfulspam]

Some people don't seem to understand the term "the benefit of the doubt", nor the difference in terms of reputation between a convicted rapist / paedophile and a currently employed public prosecutor. If there are bins to be trawled through as far as HCW is concerned, trawl away!  I'm sure attempts have already been made to find some dirt on him, as I'm sure there have been years of concerted but unsuccessful effort to dig up the dirt on the McCanns.  What's stopping you Faith?  Dig it up and it may well change our opinion.

You do understand that it isn't a prosecutors job to prove a suspect innocent, right?

Could that possibly have some bearing on the potential veracity of his claims, maybe?

[barrier]

Eolyers statement is evidence... It's quite obvious you cannot see thst.  It isvas much evidence as any other witness statement.  He says he has seen something that makes him 100% sure Maddie had been murdered by CB. You dint have to believe him.. But his statement is evidence

Then we go back to Oct last where Wolters said he has no video or photographic evidence,

A reminder: If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn’t have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence.”

[Mr Gray]

His statement is evidence he said it, its not evidence of the actual fact of him (CB) killing the girl.

It's evidence to support Maddies death and CBss guilt

Posters seem to cinfuse evidence and proof

[G-Unit]

Eolyers statement is evidence... It's quite obvious you cannot see thst.  It isvas much evidence as any other witness statement.  He says he has seen something that makes him 100% sure Maddie had been murdered by CB. You dint have to believe him.. But his statement is evidence

His words are not evidence of anything except his convictions. The real evidence is what he has seen to convince him. It's either enough to convince others or it's not. That's the crux of the matter.

[Mr Gray]

Then we go back to Oct last where Wolters said he has no video or photographic evidence,

A reminder: If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn’t have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence.”

He hasn't said he doesn't have photographic evidence.. Several things he's said suggests he has.
A photo of MM dead with CB in camera would be proof

[barrier]

It's evidence to support Maddies death and CBss guilt

Posters seem to cinfuse evidence and proof

Its you are confused in other statement's which I've posted allegedly coming from Wolters is that :If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn’t have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence.”