Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Lace]

How could it have been a Horrible Job if he was intending to abuse and or kill Madeleine for his own pleasure?

I wondered about that,  I think he was working for someone else IMO

[jassi]

I wondered about that,  I think he was working for someone else IMO

Employed as a hit man to kill a child?
Doesn't sound likely to me

[Wonderfulspam]

I wondered about that,  I think he was working for someone else IMO

So someone else hired him to abduct rape & murder Maddie?

He got paid to do it?

I wonder why someone would hire him to do that.

[barrier]

Meanwhile, let's all hear it for Breuckner.  A Convicted Paedophile and Rapist.

But not a murderer which if Wolters is to be believed lies at the heart of this case.

[barrier]

I've never said I can prove the sftstements are not accurate... So that's a fall at the first fence for you.
Based on all the facts I find Wolters credible.... That's quite a reasonable position. Based in all the facts I don't find the alerts credible.. But you do. Yet you can't prove the alerts have value.

We shall see shortly who is the class star and who is the dunce

Shortly is with in a short time, hrs, days,  weeks, hazard a guess you've put the timescale up.

[Brietta]

Employed as a hit man to kill a child?
Doesn't sound likely to me

That is your interpretation of a post which did not say that.  Please have the courage of your conviction and own up to your own opinion without resorting to misrepresenting another's post.

[Venturi Swirl]

Employed as a hit man to kill a child?
Doesn't sound likely to me

Not to KILL a child necessarily. 

[Brietta]

But not a murderer which if Wolters is to be believed lies at the heart of this case.

How do you know he isn't a murderer?

[jassi]

That is your interpretation of a post which did not say that.  Please have the courage of your conviction and own up to your own opinion without resorting to misrepresenting another's post.

Doesn't 'Doesn't sound likely to me' sound like an opinion ?

[barrier]

How do you know he isn't a murderer?

Oh! we know he is amongst your ilk and their minds.

[Wonderfulspam]

How do you know he isn't a murderer?

How do you know anyone isn't?

Me, my sister in law, the milk man, even, dare I say it, the McCanns.

[G-Unit]

I've never said I can prove the sftstements are not accurate... So that's a fall at the first fence for you.
Based on all the facts I find Wolters credible.... That's quite a reasonable position. Based in all the facts I don't find the alerts credible.. But you do. Yet you can't prove the alerts have value.

We shall see shortly who is the class star and who is the dunce

So your opinion of the statements was formed how? Did someone you believe tell you they weren't accurate? Wolters has talked the talk, but can he walk the walk? You think he can, I have doubts.

MWT may have information that hampers the German investigation, he may not. At least he's looking at it all from a neutral position, and I'm not convinced the German investigators have done that.

I don't feel the need to prove myself on here, that's been achieved elsewhere where it counts for something.

[Venturi Swirl]

So your opinion of the statements was formed how? Did someone you believe tell you they weren't accurate? Wolters has talked the talk, but can he walk the walk? You think he can, I have doubts.

MWT may have information that hampers the German investigation, he may not. At least he's looking at it all from a neutral position, and I'm not convinced the German investigators have done that.

I don't feel the need to prove myself on here, that's been achieved elsewhere where it counts for something.

What gives you the impression that MWT is looking at it from a neutral position and not from the position of making a series that will attract the most attention possible?

[barrier]

So your opinion of the statements was formed how? Did someone you believe tell you they weren't accurate? Wolters has talked the talk, but can he walk the walk? You think he can, I have doubts.

MWT may have information that hampers the German investigation, he may not. At least he's looking at it all from a neutral position, and I'm not convinced the German investigators have done that.

According to the Mirror quoting Wolters he's not aware of the alibi, either he or his team are  not  very good investigators or the Mirror did not quote Wolters.

[barrier]

What gives you the impression that MWT is looking at it from a neutral position and not from the position of making a series that will attract the most attention possible?

Is he on some kind of piece work, the more viewing the better the pay ?