So your opinion of the statements was formed how? Did someone you believe tell you they weren't accurate? Wolters has talked the talk, but can he walk the walk? You think he can, I have doubts.
MWT may have information that hampers the German investigation, he may not. At least he's looking at it all from a neutral position, and I'm not convinced the German investigators have done that.
I don't feel the need to prove myself on here, that's been achieved elsewhere where it counts for something.
First... Translation is not an exact science
The statements are not verbatim
Kate has said there are mistakes... That's evidence
Colin Sutton said the room for error was enormous
I recall an article in the mail where Rebelo question ed their reliability
The mccanns could not read what they were signing
That's enough to cast doubt.
I find Wolters credible plus he is not speaking for himself.. He's speaking for the BKA investigation and there's not one word of dissent.
Everything he says is consistent.
You and others are going to look foolish if he does have this evidence.. Let's wait and see