Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[G-Unit]

Whatever he’s got you’ll be disappointed because it 99.99% won’t be shocking new information pointing at the parents.

It's about Brueckner, isn't it?

[Mr Gray]

Oh I see, so Wolters hasn't solved the case then IYO

Brueckner could be totally innocent & Maddie may not even have been abducted in the first place.

Acceptance and blind acceptance are two different things

[Wonderfulspam]

Acceptance and blind acceptance are two different things

Well you seem certain there is concrete evidence against Brueckner, have you seen any?

[Venturi Swirl]

It's about Brueckner, isn't it?

It’s about the case isn’t it?

[Eleanor]

Such a big difference from the opening page to this Thread.

Mark Williams Thomas is a chancer who has so far got nothing right.

[jassi]

Such a big difference from the opening page to this Thread.

Mark Williams Thomas is a chancer who has so far got nothing right.

No better nor worse than any of the others who produce theses documentaries and books, IMO.

They all have to earn a crust.

[misty]

MWT tweeted this 10 mins ago...

Name changed for UK broadcast on 11 May on
@channel5_tv
  - in UK is called .#MadeleineMccann :The Case Against Christian B

[barrier]

MWT tweeted this 10 mins ago...

Name changed for UK broadcast on 11 May on
@channel5_tv
  - in UK is called .#MadeleineMccann :The Case Against Christian B

Wonder if what he shows will firm up or cast doubt, luckily I'm out the country then, still I'll get back and no doubt see total unbiased views on it.

[barrier]

MWT tweeted this 10 mins ago...

Name changed for UK broadcast on 11 May on
@channel5_tv
  - in UK is called .#MadeleineMccann :The Case Against Christian B

It is now showing on the listings.

https://www.teleboy.ch/en/tv-guide/channels/191/five?date=2022-05-11



 
Channel 5    Wednesday, 11. May • 22:00 - 23:30
Madeleine McCann: The New Suspect
Documentary

Mark Williams-Thomas, a former detective-turned-investigative journalist, carries out the first active, British TV investigation into Madeleine McCann 'prime suspect' Christian B. He obtains an account from Christian B himself and tests it against verifiable facts.

[G-Unit]

MWT says;

None of the supposed evidence against him stands up. No wonder over two years on, the German prosecutors have not charged him. I have no evidence Brueckner is responsible for the abduction and murder of Madeleine McCann.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10776129/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-claims-miles-away-having-sex-woman.html

[Mr Gray]

MWT says;

None of the supposed evidence against him stands up. No wonder over two years on, the German prosecutors have not charged him. I have no evidence Brueckner is responsible for the abduction and murder of Madeleine McCann.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10776129/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-claims-miles-away-having-sex-woman.html

Hes reached that decision based on the evidence against CB that is in the public domain. Depending on this alibi which may not stand up to scrutiny i dont see what convinces him that CB is innocent.
I wonder why hes chosen to ignore the fact that Wolters claims he has more evidence

[Venturi Swirl]

Hes reached that decision based on the evidence against CB that is in the public domain. Depending on this alibi which may not stand up to scrutiny i dont see what convinces him that CB is innocent.
I wonder why hes chosen to ignore the fact that Wolters claims he has more evidence

Even from this distance and without having seen the programme it seems clear the so-called alibi is nothing of the sort.

[Eleanor]

Hes reached that decision based on the evidence against CB that is in the public domain. Depending on this alibi which may not stand up to scrutiny i dont see what convinces him that CB is innocent.
I wonder why hes chosen to ignore the fact that Wolters claims he has more evidence

I wondered about that.

[faithlilly]

Hes reached that decision based on the evidence against CB that is in the public domain. Depending on this alibi which may not stand up to scrutiny i dont see what convinces him that CB is innocent.
I wonder why hes chosen to ignore the fact that Wolters claims he has more evidence

And I wonder why you’ve chosen, against all evidence, to ignore that Wolter has admitted that he has OT investigated Brueckner’s alibi?

[Mr Gray]

And I wonder why you’ve chosen, against all evidence, to ignore that Wolter has admitted that he has OT investigated Brueckner’s alibi?

You are wrong.. Wolters hasn't admitted any such thing.  He's said CB hasn't given him any alibi.  From what I can see Wolters, has thoroughly investigated all those CB was involved with around this time to preempt any alibi