Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Venturi Swirl]

MWT:  “Despite poisonous rumours and speculation by people who lack real insight into the crime, there is no evidence at all against Madeleine's parents Gerry and Kate.

They were clearly not involved in any way with her disappearance”.

Something I’m sure we can all agree on now. 

[faithlilly]

typical pyschopath, loving the attention, cocky, arrogant, no wonder he is much loved by the resident trolls on here, I guess they see him as a kindred spirit.

The only people on this forum liking posts about how certain they are that a young child has been murdered by a vicious paedophile are your ilk. You couldn’t access the moral high ground with crampons lady.

[Eleanor]

MWT:  “Despite poisonous rumours and speculation by people who lack real insight into the crime, there is no evidence at all against Madeleine's parents Gerry and Kate.

They were clearly not involved in any way with her disappearance”.

Something I’m sure we can all agree on now. 

Wait for it.

[Venturi Swirl]

The only people on this forum liking posts about how certain they are that a young child has been murdered by a vicious paedophile are your ilk. You couldn’t access the moral high ground with crampons lady.

Not this again.    Are you still under the bizarre impression that I and my “ilk” are glad that Madeleine was abducted and murdered by a paedophile?  Are you really that stupid and/or nasty?

[Mr Gray]

The only people on this forum liking posts about how certain they are that a young child has been murdered by a vicious paedophile are your ilk. You couldn’t access the moral high ground with crampons lady.

you have very easily accessed the immoral high ground. It seems highly likely maddie was abused and murdered by a vile paedophile....the truth can be unpleasant but we have to accept it

[Venturi Swirl]

you have very easily accessed the immoral high ground. It seems highly likely maddie was abused and murdered by a vile paedophile....the truth can be unpleasant but we have to accept it

There must be a word for people who repeatedly twist the truth to score cheap, nasty points like she does, but I probably wouldn’t be allowed to use it on here.

[Wonderfulspam]

you have very easily accessed the immoral high ground. It seems highly likely maddie was abused and murdered by a vile paedophile....the truth can be unpleasant but we have to accept it

What parts are you having doubts about?

Are you thinking that maybe she wasn't abused but was murdered, or that she was abused but wasn't murdered or that none of it even happened at all?

[Wonderfulspam]

I forgot one, maybe the paedophile that murdered her wasn't vile, it was Brueckner's accomplice that killed her & he was a nice paedophile.

[faithlilly]

Not this again.    Are you still under the bizarre impression that I and my “ilk” are glad that Madeleine was abducted and murdered by a paedophile?  Are you really that stupid and/or nasty?

Not glad, unfeeling and unconcerned would be more accurate. What is it that drives you because it certainly isn’t concern for the child?

[faithlilly]

There must be a word for people who repeatedly twist the truth to score cheap, nasty points like she does, but I probably wouldn’t be allowed to use it on here.

Not twisting, merely reporting.

[Venturi Swirl]

Not twisting, merely reporting.

What, that I have no morals?  That I am pleased Madeleine was abducted, raped and murdered?  Tell you what, I don’t think even the Daily Sport would hire you as a reporter, so don’t give up the day job.

[faithlilly]

What, that I have no morals?  That I am pleased Madeleine was abducted, raped and murdered?  Tell you what, I don’t think even the Daily Sport would hire you as a reporter, so don’t give up the day job.

Oh do stop being a drama queen….it really doesn’t suit you….and for the umpteenth time I said unconcerned not pleased but it appears that you want to be offended so crack on.

[Venturi Swirl]

Oh do stop being a drama queen….it really doesn’t suit you….and for the umpteenth time I said unconcerned not pleased but it appears that you want to be offended so crack on.

You did not say “unconcerned “ you said “like”. It is an accusation you have made several times before. You questioned my morals.

“The only people on this forum liking posts about how certain they are that a young child has been murdered by a vicious paedophile are your ilk. You couldn’t access the moral high ground with crampons lady”.

Tell me, exactly what is wrong with my morals?   

[faithlilly]

You did not say “unconcerned “ you said “like”. It is an accusation you have made several times before. You questioned my morals.

“The only people on this forum liking posts about how certain they are that a young child has been murdered by a vicious paedophile are your ilk. You couldn’t access the moral high ground with crampons lady”.

Tell me, exactly what is wrong with my morals?

‘Liked’ posts, not like Madeleine’s predicament. There is a difference.

As to your morals, generally, I don’t know you so can’t comment.

[Venturi Swirl]

‘Liked’ posts, not like Madeleine’s predicament. There is a difference.

As to your morals, generally, I don’t know you so can’t comment.

But you did comment.  Perhaps you should not have.  Perhaps finally you have learnt a lesson, that when people “like” a post such as a news article about developments in the case that it does not mean that they like the idea of Madeleine’s horrific death at the hands of a paedophile, nor does it mean that they are morally suspect.  Perhaps you have learned this lesson, but most likely you have not. Oh well, until the next time you do it again (which you surely will)  let’s consider the matter shelved….