Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Venturi Swirl]

I thought a different person had that number now than the one who had it in 2007? Hadn't it been reallocated?

Still a bit of a coincidence, unless paedo searches on men's phones is a far more common phenomenon than they care to admit.

[Mr Gray]

That's a fallacy;

"the absence of evidence fallacy occurs when someone uses a lack of evidence to try to “prove” something. Of course, the problem with this line of reasoning is that a lack of evidence is just that: a lack. You can’t use it to conclude anything; you could only conclude that we still don’t know about that thing.
https://blog.blueprintprep.com/lsat/flawctober-the-absence-of-evidence-fallacy/

so did Duarte claim the archiving report was evidence of innocence..which it was...or proof of innocence...which it wasnt....Having said that as this was a civil trial..proof does not mean absolute but on the balance of probabilities

[G-Unit]

so did Duarte claim the archiving report was evidence of innocence..which it was...or proof of innocence...which it wasnt....Having said that as this was a civil trial..proof does not mean absolute but on the balance of probabilities

Proof;

Just as (this STJ's Section) could not assert that it is not acceptable to assimilate the aforementioned filing order to a verified proof of innocence,
https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Annulment_request.htm

[Mr Gray]

Proof;

Just as (this STJ's Section) could not assert that it is not acceptable to assimilate the aforementioned filing order to a verified proof of innocence,
https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Annulment_request.htm

That is one translation...ive also seen it as evidence of innocence....do you have a cite for what Duarte actually claimed. if the mccanns had been tried and found not guilty that would not be proof of innocence...only evidence...so i would be quite shocked if Duarte claimed proof of innocence

[Eleanor]

Proof;

Just as (this STJ's Section) could not assert that it is not acceptable to assimilate the aforementioned filing order to a verified proof of innocence,
https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Annulment_request.htm

You will have The McCanns found guilty if it's the last thing you ever do.

Good luck with that one.

[adam]

Seems the police are miles away from being able to arrest Christian B.

His name has been circulating for a long time. However all the police can say is he's an official suspect.

The documentary seemed to say he was with someone miles away that night. However had the opportunity to abduct Madeleine a few hours earlier.

Be surprised he would be calm enough to commit the crime, then straight away go and meet someone else. Then again he was a serial criminal.

[adam]

Thought the phone records were more conclusive. However the documentary  seems to say it covers a 35 mile radious & Cristian B may not have been the user.

Believe he could be guilty. But can't see him being charged.
 

[Venturi Swirl]

Seems the police are miles away from being able to arrest Christian B.

His name has been circulating for a long time. However all the police can say is he's an official suspect.

The documentary seemed to say he was with someone miles away that night. However had the opportunity to abduct Madeleine a few hours earlier.

Be surprised he would be calm enough to commit the crime, then straight away go and meet someone else. Then again he was a serial criminal.

and yet some people have no trouble believing the McCanns could behave normally at dinner knowing their child had just died so…

[Venturi Swirl]

Thought the phone records were more conclusive. However the documentary  seems to say it covers a 35 mile radious & Cristian B may not have been the user.

Believe he could be guilty. But can't see him being charged.

the thing is, the documentary did not have access to all the evidence against CB.

[Anthro]

The documentary is now available on Youtube. https://youtu.be/D0F_zO5TXqY

[Mr Gray]

Everything depends on what further evidence Wolters has.  Wolters is really the only person who can give an informed opinion on CBs guilt.  MWT can't.... And he should have realised this

[Wonderfulspam]

Everything depends on what further evidence Wolters has.  Wolters is really the only person who can give an informed opinion on CBs guilt.  MWT can't.... And he should have realised this

What Wolters might have isn't sufficient to successfully prosecute Brueckner with.
So I wouldn't waste time worrying about it if I were you.

[Mr Gray]

What Wolters might have isn't sufficient to successfully prosecute Brueckner with.
So I wouldn't waste time worrying about it if I were you.

Fortunately I'm not you and not worried.
Wolters may well have sufficiemt evidence to prosecute....but has time to build the perfect case

[Wonderfulspam]

Fortunately I'm not you and not worried.
Wolters may well have sufficiemt evidence to prosecute....but has time to build the perfect case

Or, he could just be barking up the wrong nonce, that's possible also.

[adam]

Didn't documentary say Christian B was making good money at the time. From drug selling?

Therefore the theory it was originally a burglary & then escalated does not fit.

Then again his rape of a 72 year old woman does have similarities. He must have stalked the womens home & known she was alone. Then climbed over walls.