Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Brietta]

Amaral has said there was no medical evidence of rape..

Amaral has said that Brueckner had dreadlocks in 2007.  Evidence that quite often what Amaral says is not true.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters should adhere to the law. The case needs to be tested in a court of law, not in a trial by tabloid newspapers.

You are entitled to your opinion... and that's all it is.
For me... Let's see if he solves the case

[G-Unit]

The second episode is on tonight at 22:00 Channel 5.

[jassi]

I think it's a repeat from last week.

[G-Unit]

I think it's a repeat from last week.

I think it's the second episode. Three one-hour episodes were reduced to two 90 minute episodes?

[Venturi Swirl]

I think it's the second episode. Three one-hour episodes were reduced to two 90 minute episodes?

Oh goody, perhaps all the real good stuff, the bombshells etc were left to this episode.  I shall strap myself into my chair.

[Venturi Swirl]

Actually, I think Jassi is correct
https://www.channel5.com/show/madeleine-mccann-the-case-against-christian-b/season-2022/madeleine-mccann-the-case-against-christian-b
which makes one wonder what was so explosive (or so dull) that they had to leave 90 minutes of it on the cutting room floor...

[Eleanor]

You are entitled to your opinion... and that's all it is.
For me... Let's see if he solves the case

Who?  Mark Williams Thomas?  No Alibi and just a load of convoluted rubbish designed to earn money from The Media.

I was actually prepared to listen to this, just in case.  No one on this Forum has been as prepared as I to defend Brueckner's right to innocence.  And look where that got me.  Demodded after nine years.  And Yes, I do mind.   Although God knows why.

But it could be a measure of who I am.

[Myster]

I think it's the second episode. Three one-hour episodes were reduced to two 90 minute episodes?

There's only one episode, now stagnant water under the bridge.  Williams-Thomas' docu was a busted flush, I'm afraid.

[Eleanor]

There's only one episode, now stagnant water under the bridge.  Williams-Thomas' docu was a busted flush, I'm afraid.

Much Ado About Nothing.  But as ever.  Mark Williams Thomas never accomplishes anything.

[Myster]

Much Ado About Nothing.  But as ever.  Mark Williams Thomas never accomplishes anything.

It started off in a promising fashion with the discovery that Brueckner's alleged caller accessed paedophile websites on his phone, but then it was downstream all the way with a rehash of work that other investigators had previously achieved.  MWT missed the boat... Slaps wrist, must refrain from these aquatic analogies.

[Venturi Swirl]

It started off in a promising fashion with the discovery that Brueckner's alleged caller accessed paedophile websites on his phone, but then it was downstream all the way with a rehash of work that other investigators had previously achieved.  MWT missed the boat... Slaps wrist, must refrain from these aquatic analogies.

Yes I found it odd that he did not pursue that glaring revelation further.  It was a paedophile that called the number purportedly used in PdL on the night of 3rd May by the prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann but no follow up?!  Why not? 

[Brietta]

Much Ado About Nothing.  But as ever.  Mark Williams Thomas never accomplishes anything.

Don't know about that, Eleanor.  I think MWT has a history of getting hold of the wrong end of the stick and none more so than this which bears no comparison to the revelations in recent German documentaries and Jon Clarke's investigative journalism.

He's been well and truly caught out this time round when real professionals have thrown their hats into the ring.  I think the hype has been shown to be nothing more or less than disinformation already discarded by investigators prior to broadcast.  Just sensationalism which played well for him in the past, but ultimately has let him and his audiences down badly.

[The General]

Who?  Mark Williams Thomas?  No Alibi and just a load of convoluted rubbish designed to earn money from The Media.

I was actually prepared to listen to this, just in case.  No one on this Forum has been as prepared as I to defend Brueckner's right to innocence.  And look where that got me.  Demodded after nine years.  And Yes, I do mind.   Although God knows why.

But it could be a measure of who I am.

You never mentioned it.

[Eleanor]

Don't know about that, Eleanor.  I think MWT has a history of getting hold of the wrong end of the stick and none more so than this which bears no comparison to the revelations in recent German documentaries and Jon Clarke's investigative journalism.

He's been well and truly caught out this time round when real professionals have thrown their hats into the ring.  I think the hype has been shown to be nothing more or less than disinformation already discarded by investigators prior to broadcast.  Just sensationalism which played well for him in the past, but ultimately has let him and his audiences down badly.

MWT does ever show what a shyster he is when it comes to making money.

I would like to say that watching his Pod Cast is an hour that I will never get back, but it was worth every ghastly minute.