As far as I can see the fund conforms with every single law required of it. It discloses everything that is necessary.
Why should they waste time and money to satisfy the nosey parkers (anti [ censored word ]s) who think the managers of the charity should be at their beck and call?
When anyone points out a single illegal or immoral action by the fund then I will start to look into it. But no-one has ever shown a single such illegal or immoral action by the fund.
Of course there are a few other funds which have been set up related to the McCann case. Bennett has set up at least one, and there is one on behalf of Amaral I believe. None of these are in any way open to any form of legal or financial scrutiny. I feel that is quite disgraceful and I further believe that anyone who demands further exposition of the Madeleine Fund accounts which are already fully in conformity with all legal requirements and are financially scrutinised annually, is simply a rank hypocrite. When they demand scrutiny of all accounts and not just the one belonging to the McCanns then they might be worth my attention. Till then I look down on them as hypocrites.
The Fund is promoted by the McCanns on their website with the claim that it ensures the "highest standards of transparency and accountability"
The Fund ( and the McCanns ) have the opportunity to justify that claim by presenting full and detailed accounts
They don't legally
have to file full accounts, of course, but if they are going to claim highest standards of transparecy then they really
should be filing full accounts
Why wouldn't they, afterall ? ... why wouldn't they take the opportunity to be
seen to be open and transparent where the Fund is concerned ?