Goncalo Amaral.

[jassi]

Google is everyone's friend 

[Mr Gray]

You don't need to, Davel does it for you. Let's hope he's doing it right, eh?

You might remember how many sceptics claimed the ECHR case had nothing to do with amaral. i was almost a lone voice saying it did...and was proved right

You may have noticed how much he has reigned in his comments

[Mr Gray]

Google is everyone's friend 

I think you would have to be pig ignorant not to realise how useful google is to carry out research...but I suppose some people are

[G-Unit]

You might remember how many sceptics claimed the ECHR case had nothing to do with amaral. i was almost a lone voice saying it did...and was proved right

You may have noticed how much he has reigned in his comments

Is that your evidence - that he (in your opinion) has reined in his comments? I don't think that he has, so you haven't convinced me that you're right.

[Eleanor]

You don't need to, Davel does it for you. Let's hope he's doing it right, eh?

I am sure that Davel is doing it right.  But all cases rest on their own merit in the end.  And Portugal does have a history of losing these cases, as Davel pointed out.

This Forum would not be so well informed legally, but for Davel.

You can ignore the known facts if you like.  No skin off my nose.

[Eleanor]

Is that your evidence - that he (in your opinion) has reined in his comments? I don't think that he has, so you haven't convinced me that you're right.

Amaral has reigned in his comments as far as I can see.  Not that I care.  Amaral has always been wrong.

[Mr Gray]

Is that your evidence - that he (in your opinion) has reined in his comments? I don't think that he has, so you haven't convinced me that you're right.

Read his last comments a few days ago... Does he say Maddie died in an accident which was covered up by the parents. You are once again in denial. Unless you have problems with your memory you should be aware that's not the entirety of my reasoning

[Mr Gray]

Is that your evidence - that he (in your opinion) has reined in his comments? I don't think that he has, so you haven't convinced me that you're right.

ive just reread his latest comments...no mention of accidental death and cover up...no mention of his book that he was sued for. if posters cant see how he has stopped his accusations they must be blind

[G-Unit]

ive just reread his latest comments...no mention of accidental death and cover up...no mention of his book that he was sued for. if posters cant see how he has stopped his accusations they must be blind

His views are well known and a matter of record. Now he's moved on and is discussing the latest developments in the case. Perhaps you should move on too.

[barrier]

You might remember how many sceptics claimed the ECHR case had nothing to do with amaral. i was almost a lone voice saying it did...and was proved right

You may have noticed how much he has reigned in his comments

Well he still gets under a few noses on here so he's not that silent, unless a grudge is borne .

[barrier]

His views are well known and a matter of record. Now he's moved on and is discussing the latest developments in the case. Perhaps you should move on too.

Grist for the mill.

[Mr Gray]

Well he still gets under a few noses on here so he's not that silent, unless a grudge is borne .

If youve understood my posts you will see that to a certain extent I dont blame amaral. He genuinely thinks what he says is true. Hes listened to what grime has claimed about his dogs and if everything grime has claimed is true...if his dogs are taht reliable...then Maddie died in the apartment and the parents are.....

[barrier]

If youve understood my posts you will see that to a certain extent I dont blame amaral. He genuinely thinks what he says is true. Hes listened to what grime has claimed about his dogs and if everything grime has claimed is true...if his dogs are taht reliable...then Maddie died in the apartment and the parents are.....

I said a few, their post's reveal it.

[Mr Gray]

His views are well known and a matter of record. Now he's moved on and is discussing the latest developments in the case. Perhaps you should move on too.

wrong again...hes discussing the original investigaton  too..you need to read it again

[Eleanor]

His views are well known and a matter of record. Now he's moved on and is discussing the latest developments in the case. Perhaps you should move on too.

Perhaps you should leave Members to express their own opinions.

Amaral should not be discussing anything about the case.