The difference between them and sceptics is that they want Madeleine's disappearance to be explained - neither sceptics nor Amaral ever want that to happen.
Well GA knew that Maddie wasn't going to turn up anytime soon.............and she didn't.
You are incapable of letting go of victim blaming
Think the victim apart from Maddie was GA.......A victim your post can't let go of.
You said -
"Well GA knew that Maddie wasn't going to turn up anytime soon.............and she didn't." One wonders why it has never piqued your curiosity how he could be so certain about Madeleine and the very similar case of Joana Cipriano.
You said -
"Think the victim apart from Maddie was GA.......A victim your post can't let go of." Firstly, please allow me to remind you of the thread title "Goncalo Amaral" which makes it perfectly appropriate for me. you or anyone else who wishes to comment on Amaral to be allowed to comment without let or hindrance.
Known as freedom of speech and on this forum at least only that which is true is acceptable, so I won't be letting go of the truth despite your antipathy to my posts.
As far as Amaral being a VICTIM goes. You believe it or you wouldn't have posted it and I have no doubt that that there is evidence of past paranoia directed towards Madeleine's parents. For example Amaral was of the opinion that his political career was thwarted by Gerry (never crossed his mind his criminal conviction and history might have been of significance) it was all the fault of McCann.