Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
22
Have you watched the video?  It’s. car park full of cars.   Grime will obviously be aware one of the cars is the McCanns but apparently it never crossed his mind that the Renault Scenic which was plastered in Madeleine posters and which they had appeared on TV driving around in was theirs?

You are accusing then a UK Policeman of gross unprofessional bias yet I see no evidence of this in the video. The car isn't plastered with posters - there are perhaps three which Grime probably can't even read, imo, from his position
23
His book isn't an attempt to rubbish an abduction theory. It is none of the scenarios he investigated. The book is his account of the investigation of the evidence in front of him. The fact remains that accidental head injury is common . in the home and certain factors increase the risk - not least the lack of adult supervision. It is actually the leading cause of death in young people.No-one is claiming that most accidents lead to death. It's a possibility however particularly if the child loses consciousness and is unsupervised.

Amaral's issue with an abduction (a scenario he himself lists as one of three possible scenarios) is that, apart from one witness talking about an open window into the child's bedroom, and some reports of burglaries and people being seen lurking outside there is no other concrete evidence to support the theory. There is from the Tapas group an evolving inconsistent description of their movements on the night; a changing description on how people enter the flat and by which route; different descriptions of how the flat was found; an insistence by the parents of an abduction by paedophiles from nigh on the start; a cadaver dog alert; a blood dog alert and samples tested (which show a possible yet inconclusive match to the victim); and later before the book but after Amaral is removed from the investigation UK Police release testimony from the Gaspar's that everyone here is familiar with. Amaral is also told by a witness that he thinks the man he saw carrying a child in a direction away from the apartment was probably Gerry McCann, in his opinion. We can add to this evidence that children in 5a were heard to cry for over an hour and a half as they had been left alone unsupervised on another night before the disappearance. Amaral also knew the victim was known to wake and wonder at night.

None of this evidence proved anything - but then neither did the evidence of abduction. The case remains unsolved. However, it would be remiss for any detective faced with the evidence above not to dismiss parental involvement so, as UK Police describe. to at least "clear the ground from under their feet".

Eddie wasn't a Cadaver Dog.

The Gaspars disagreed.
24
Anyway all of this belongs in the “Amaral’s Book Is A Load of Cobblers Because…” this one is about rubbishing the abduction theory, which is neither plausible nor logical because….

His book isn't an attempt to rubbish an abduction theory. It is none of the scenarios he investigated. The book is his account of the investigation of the evidence in front of him. The fact remains that accidental head injury is common . in the home and certain factors increase the risk - not least the lack of adult supervision. It is actually the leading cause of death in young people.No-one is claiming that most accidents lead to death. It's a possibility however particularly if the child loses consciousness and is unsupervised.

Amaral's issue with an abduction (a scenario he himself lists as one of three possible scenarios) is that, apart from one witness talking about an open window into the child's bedroom, and some reports of burglaries and people being seen lurking outside there is no other concrete evidence to support the theory. There is from the Tapas group an evolving inconsistent description of their movements on the night; a changing description on how people enter the flat and by which route; different descriptions of how the flat was found; an insistence by the parents of an abduction by paedophiles from nigh on the start; a cadaver dog alert; a blood dog alert and samples tested (which show a possible yet inconclusive match to the victim); and later before the book but after Amaral is removed from the investigation UK Police release testimony from the Gaspar's that everyone here is familiar with. Amaral is also told by a witness that he thinks the man he saw carrying a child in a direction away from the apartment was probably Gerry McCann, in his opinion. We can add to this evidence that children in 5a were heard to cry for over an hour and a half as they had been left alone unsupervised on another night before the disappearance. Amaral also knew the victim was known to wake and wonder at night.

None of this evidence proved anything - but then neither did the evidence of abduction. The case remains unsolved. However, it would be remiss for any detective faced with the evidence above not to dismiss parental involvement so, as UK Police describe. to at least "clear the ground from under their feet".
25
Is this the only video available?...

https://www.mediafire.com/file/ag6ym8nyp5g8hst/Madeleine_McCann_-_Sniffer_Dogs_Eddie_and_Keela.mp4/file

If you watch closely, at first a Madeleine Missing poster/sticker is visible in the nearside rear window in the McCann car (59.DA.27), but several seconds later when Grime shows the dog is correctly indicating at the same car, this poster has disappeared!  Why?
I think some lame excuse has been proffered for this in the past but I can't recall what it was.  Whichever way you look at it, it smells bad (pardon the pun).
26
Is this the only video available?...

https://www.mediafire.com/file/ag6ym8nyp5g8hst/Madeleine_McCann_-_Sniffer_Dogs_Eddie_and_Keela.mp4/file

If you watch closely, at first a Madeleine Missing poster/sticker is visible in the nearside rear window in the McCann car (59.DA.27), but several seconds later when Grime shows the dog is correctly indicating at the same car, this poster has disappeared!  Why?

This is true.

I do wish you posted more often.

O'Connor said thanks for the Mona Lisa poster.  Rotten Little Shit.  He is history now, but only in the nicest way.
27
Is this the only video available?...

https://www.mediafire.com/file/ag6ym8nyp5g8hst/Madeleine_McCann_-_Sniffer_Dogs_Eddie_and_Keela.mp4/file

If you watch closely, at first a Madeleine Missing poster/sticker is visible in the nearside rear window in the McCann car (59.DA.27), but several seconds later when Grime shows the dog is correctly indicating at the same car, this poster has disappeared!  Why?

Many thanks Ill take a look
28
Have you eatched the video
Is this the only video available?...

https://www.mediafire.com/file/ag6ym8nyp5g8hst/Madeleine_McCann_-_Sniffer_Dogs_Eddie_and_Keela.mp4/file

If you watch closely, at first a Madeleine Missing poster/sticker is visible in the nearside rear window in the McCann car (59.DA.27), but several seconds later when Grime shows the dog is correctly indicating at the same car, this poster has disappeared!  Why?
29

Ive regularly posted that should the mccanns bbr successful at thhr ECHR they could go back to a Portuguese court and take Amaral back to court. Ive said this is why imo Amaral has been so quiet and no longer promotes his theory.
Other posters including you have said the ECHR csse had nothing to do with Amaral and  the SC decision is final.

It now turns out I was right and the outcome of the ECHR csse could be a serious problem for Amaral.

One can but hope after all these years.

I don't know what is wrong with Amaral, although I have got some ideas on the subject.  But his investivigating skills were abysmal and centred only around himself.

However, there should be a few bob left in the kitty.  Even if any other of his creditors have been paid anything at all.
30
Oh dear, another dim bulb. Even the CT don't try to pretend that Bonnet's log wasn't available at trial. They claim that it was West's log they didn't have sight of while they admit that West himself had a copy of it in the witness box when he was cross examined on his 3.36 time error - a cross examination that obviously proves the defence were fully aware of the time discrepancies on the two logs with the time of Bambers calls to West and JM being important to the vanishing credibility of his ever changing account.

I just don't get how anyone falls for this stuff.
Dee Sadler continuing to spout BS on behalf of poor, misunderstood, unloved Jeremy Bamber. Why on earth they think thirty podcasts containing mistruth after falsehood will have any influence and result in his release is beyond me and I would think most other sensible people who have examined this case logically and analytically in depth over many years. Is it any wonder why comments are strictly forbidden on all their podcasts ?... they're obviously scared at being challenged...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DV_eIfCWFno
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10