Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?

[Icanhandlethetruth]

of the dogs (see appendix 4). However, it must be stated any such indications without any physical evidence to support them can not have any evidential value, being unconfirmed indications. Additionally I consider no inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence.

 And yet the indications have been used as evidence in two High Court murder trials.  Maybe the High Court judge is the higher authority than Mark Harrison. What do you think?

[Mr Gray]

And yet the indications have been used as evidence in two High Court murder trials.  Maybe the High Court judge is the higher authority than Mark Harrison. What do you think?

It's been used because it hasn't been challenged.. Is the judge an authority on cadaver dog alerts... What knowledge does he have

[Icanhandlethetruth]

It's been used because it hasn't been challenged.. Is the judge an authority on cadaver dog alerts... What knowledge does he have

You do realise that if any evidence used in any trial was thought to inadmissible and admitted in error by a judge,the judiciary would order retrials immediately. The whole of the UK judiciary have no issue with the acceptance by High court judges of such alerts. You are just in denial.

[Mr Gray]

You do realise that if any evidence used in any trial was thought to inadmissible and admitted in error by a judge,the judiciary would order retrials immediately. The whole of the UK judiciary have no issue with the acceptance by High court judges of such alerts. You are just in denial.

Can you provide a cite for..

The whole of the UK judiciary having no problem with the acceptance of these alerts..

[Icanhandlethetruth]

Can you provide a cite for..

The whole of the UK judiciary having no problem with the acceptance of these alerts..

Yes by the fact the judgements stand.

[Mr Gray]

Yes by the fact the judgements stand.

Pathetic..

[Icanhandlethetruth]

Pathetic..

What is?

[G-Unit]

How do you decide which alerts are reliable and which are not in the absence of any forensic evidence?

The training, assessing and operational records of the team should be available. They indicate the skills and reliability of the team. A team with a good record is likely to be correct when the dog alerts.

[misty]

The training, assessing and operational records of the team should be available. They indicate the skills and reliability of the team. A team with a good record is likely to be correct when the dog alerts.

The dogs in the cases of Laci Peterson & Dylan Redwine tend to contradict such assertions. IMO.

[Venturi Swirl]

The training, assessing and operational records of the team should be available. They indicate the skills and reliability of the team. A team with a good record is likely to be correct when the dog alerts.

What constitutes a good record, and who independently tests and verifies any dog team’s reliability?

[pathfinder73]

Past cases where the dogs have proven their skills, records, tests etc.

"We also saw video played in the courtroom to demonstrate how another dog, Eddie, found a sample pair of pants hidden in the Walker County Jail that was perfumed with a cadaver scent."

http://www.scentevidence.com/2009/07/dog-debate-at-center-of-murder-case.html

[barrier]

What is?

You winning the argument,it would seem.

[The General]

Pathetic..

Stings, doesn't it. Being wrong and admitting it to yourself. That's the hard part.

[Mr Gray]

Stings, doesn't it. Being wrong and admitting it to yourself. That's the hard part.

I'm absolutely correct

[Mr Gray]

You do realise that if any evidence used in any trial was thought to inadmissible and admitted in error by a judge,the judiciary would order retrials immediately. The whole of the UK judiciary have no issue with the acceptance by High court judges of such alerts. You are just in denial.

Your claim that every high court judge agrees that the alerts are admissible is palinly absurd....and you can of course supply no evidence to support it...how could you...its a totally ridiculous claim...