Author Topic: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?  (Read 62125 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #450 on: June 11, 2021, 10:57:22 AM »
Sandra Lean (today)

Well, well, imagine MPs telling lies. Remember all of you who received letters saying they can't possibly interfere with the justice system or talk about individual cases? They just did:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jun/10/scottish-tory-msp-george-beattie-case-scotland?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

If they can do it for this case (which absolutely deserves it, obviously), then ....
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #451 on: June 11, 2021, 10:59:17 AM »
Sandra Lean (today)

Well, well, imagine MPs telling lies. Remember all of you who received letters saying they can't possibly interfere with the justice system or talk about individual cases? They just did:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jun/10/scottish-tory-msp-george-beattie-case-scotland?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

If they can do it for this case (which absolutely deserves it, obviously), then ....


LS has then stated,

Wow.....we need him and David Wilson on side’

&

JH:
So, now that he has set this precedent surely other MSP's can no longer continue fobbing off their constituents by saying that they can't interfere with the justice system or talk about individual cases?  Maybe a deluge of emails to MSP's (from constituents) quoting this article, and giving the link, would elicit a different response to requests for Luke' case to be independently reviewed than has so far been given? 


Maybe someone should break it to them they won’t be getting Russell Findlay or David Wilson ‘on side’
« Last Edit: June 11, 2021, 11:11:46 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Parky41

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #452 on: June 11, 2021, 12:15:40 PM »
Completely in line with Ms Lean - poppycock. When anyone makes this type of ridiculous claim then it instantly discredits everything else that is said.



 


Yet Lolly claims,

 “We merely delight in seeing the truth told and justice served”

more ‘poppycock’  *&^^&

Lolly again:

Quote
Luke still had mud beneath his fingernails when he was examined, he had not taken a shower as he still had greasy hair. He would have needed to have a really good long shower and scrub himself to have removed the massive amount of blood that would have come from such a vicious attack.

And again - absolute nonsense. And exactly the mirror image of Ms Leans claims since day dot. Luke Mitchell would have to have been naked when he carried out his murder for to be wanting any "good long shower and scrub himself" - hook line and sinker.

Luke Mitchell was wearing a long jacket with a hood. And we have seen the evidence around this. Of exactly where Jodi met her final moments and the clear evidence that supports this. That whilst this killer would have had blood upon his clothing, it is a far cry from having that clothing drenched. From 17.40pm until just short of 6pm for that initial change of clothing and footwear. Of it taken mere minutes at haste through the cover of the woodland next to his house. To be back from where he disappeared from sight. To be seen again with that shiny blouson jacket on. At a point where he was adamant he had not walked as far to.

LM did not have to be drenched in any blood.
LM did not need to have any shower.
LM was surrounded in a woodland he knew intimately - LM was mere minutes from his house
LM had no less than 13mins to change that clothing to be seen again for his alibi.
It took under 7:mins to get from his house onto RDP walking.
It took this 7:mins to get to his house through those woods and back onto Newbattle R'd at haste.
The average person can run more than a mile in less than 13mins.
LM had a fraction of this to cover and back.
LM needed cover through those woods. LM needed through those woods quickly.
Every part of that time had to be at haste.
LM needed to be changed.
This left LM at least 6 mins for that initial change at home.
LM had to go through a river to get to his house.
That parka easily left in the woodland at first (not the woodland strip, but next to his house)
LM knew exactly where any trace of the murder would be upon him.
He had ample means to wash this trace.
LM had up to 80:mins until he met with the boys for any further disposal, of setting that alibi in place.
The boys he met with gave evidence of how LM was not his usual unkempt self.
LM ankles were engrained with dirt, and hair that "appeared" to be greasy - for LM was covered. He had a parka style jacket on with a hood. Trousers, socks, boots, t-shirt - no shower required.
LM needed to be in a woodland - to have trace of anything from it. To be under those nails and so forth - This is why LM met with the boys in the woods of Newbattle Abbey. And to be in company for that alibi.
No one knows exactly what was used for burning that night in the Mitchell garden.
The Mitchells had ample time to dispose of any means, remnants - the lot.
There was a fire going on at different intervals over the course of the evening
SM was out and about that evening, late. - found out to be so, not given freely. He claimed he was going for fuel? Many miles from home.
SM was/is a mechanic - is this were scrapyards come into play?
It is a fallacy to believe that the police could have arrived at the Mitchell home at any point
This girl had been left in a place that LM knew would not be easy to come across.
And he was right - Jodi was not discovered over the course of that evening.
LM knew exactly how much time he had.
If Jodi had been discovered - it would have been a time consuming process for Identity and so forth.
If LM had phoned back it would have raised the alarm.
If Jodi's mother had phoned him back - he would still have had ample time for all he was doing and had to do.
The ball was firmly in LM's court.
By the time LM was in the company of the boys from the Abbey the story of alibi was set and continuing.
The disposal by means of fire and so forth was happening at the same time.
LM stayed long enough with the boys and much shorter than the time he would usually be out.
There is nothing that puts LM home before 10pm when he was witnessed by his neighbour.
LM was prepped and ready for that inevitable contact from Jodi's parents.

Jodi Jones was reported missing around 10.50pm to the police.
LM was on/at RDP by 10.59pm
LM was still on RDP by around 11.20pm.
At around 11.25pm LM introduced the woodland into this search at the Gino spot.
At around 11.30pm LM again introduced the woodland into this search at the V break.
LM at this point physically entered the woodland.
LM turned immediately to his left - no unfamiliarity, no trepidation - nothing
LM seconds later, in the time it took SK and JaJ to walk around 10 steps - shouted out he had found something.
Jodi's body was more than 40ft down from this V in the woodland. Hidden behind this large oak he described and by the wall.
Behind the wall where she most definitely died - utter nonsense from Ms Lean and the sidekicks who claim the same.
LM could not have seen what he described - LM did not go near enough.

LM had all he could have covered by the time he was prepped and ready to offer to search. LM at this point did not have to distance himself from anything -
LM distanced himself from this once the police were involved. By leading them a merry dance on how to get to where they were.
By saying no to showing them were Jodi lay - LM had absolutely no problem before this with Jodi's family.
By denying all knowledge of  both the V and the woodland prior to that evening.
By denying to having walked any further than he claimed on Newbattle R'd
By denying that Jodi was banned from using this path alone.

These are clear facts: LM nor anyone had to be drenched blood. No one had to be jumping in showers. If this killer was aware enough of DNA implications (LM was, "they wanted me over that wall to get my DNA),then they were more than astute enough not to be trailing it into the house, or having showers. LM did not have to enter his house before 6pm - his house was detached. LM had ample time for that alibi story and all else - and what a story that was. Completely disintegrated bit by bit. From 5:05pm until 5:45pm - down to less than 15mins. - LM was not at home.

And we add on those sightings. And we add on that missing knife and Jacket. And every detail of that clothing right down to the red hair fastener and those DC shoes. And of a boy who was the complete opposite of being effected in the slightest. And we add on buying and viewing that dvd of that horrible depiction of that girl in the woods. We add on the incredulous tales of waiting around all that time, on an off chance of meeting in the first place. Then we add on this "not coming out" and this "I thought you had grounded her" - We add on the best way to kill someone, the skunting knives, the replacement, the parka.

And so much more - then we go to trial. And this Jury who heard those smokescreens around others.  Of being in the area, of presence of DNA - And we show the Jury those crime scene photos, and we take them to the locus. - And they go over this timescale. That woodland - and they see first hand - the impossibility of Jodi being discovered in less than 10:mins. And they watch this wee boy through this whole process - they do not see someone who was advised not to shout out - they see someone the complete opposite of his brother, of SK of this girls family. Telling someone not to shout out in court - is the complete opposite of suppressing natural emotion.

And this beyond a reasonable doubt - From this amazing discovery in less than 10:mins- to the other end of this evening and no alibi. And for every single thing in between - And every other single piece of damming evidence heaped on top of this. - Dam right it was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

And this is why the garden path is needed, this is why those smokescreens and pawns are required. To sway one's attention onto ludicrous thoughts - of not searching Mayfield. Of being drenched and toddling down a busy road. Of bleaching crime scenes, of claiming Jodi was murdered elsewhere, of every test being the wrong one. From the pathologist right down to the testing of that massive knife, clothing, boots of this claimed person of interest - Mr D. With those "no reportable results" - Not Jodi's blood. To continuously say "well we will never know,will we? as we do not know what they were being asked to test for?"

Does this "we do not know what they were being asked to test for", apply to the pathologist also now? Was he not asked to test for a TOD? - hook line and sinker.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #453 on: June 11, 2021, 12:30:58 PM »
Lolly again:

And again - absolute nonsense. And exactly the mirror image of Ms Leans claims since day dot. Luke Mitchell would have to have been naked when he carried out his murder for to be wanting any "good long shower and scrub himself" - hook line and sinker.

Luke Mitchell was wearing a long jacket with a hood. And we have seen the evidence around this. Of exactly where Jodi met her final moments and the clear evidence that supports this. That whilst this killer would have had blood upon his clothing, it is a far cry from having that clothing drenched. From 17.40pm until just short of 6pm for that initial change of clothing and footwear. Of it taken mere minutes at haste through the cover of the woodland next to his house. To be back from where he disappeared from sight. To be seen again with that shiny blouson jacket on. At a point where he was adamant he had not walked as far to.

LM did not have to be drenched in any blood.
LM did not need to have any shower.
LM was surrounded in a woodland he knew intimately - LM was mere minutes from his house
LM had no less than 13mins to change that clothing to be seen again for his alibi.
It took under 7:mins to get from his house onto RDP walking.
It took this 7:mins to get to his house through those woods and back onto Newbattle R'd at haste.
The average person can run more than a mile in less than 13mins.
LM had a fraction of this to cover and back.
LM needed cover through those woods. LM needed through those woods quickly.
Every part of that time had to be at haste.
LM needed to be changed.
This left LM at least 6 mins for that initial change at home.
LM had to go through a river to get to his house.
That parka easily left in the woodland at first (not the woodland strip, but next to his house)
LM knew exactly where any trace of the murder would be upon him.
He had ample means to wash this trace.
LM had up to 80:mins until he met with the boys for any further disposal, of setting that alibi in place.
The boys he met with gave evidence of how LM was not his usual unkempt self.
LM ankles were engrained with dirt, and hair that "appeared" to be greasy - for LM was covered. He had a parka style jacket on with a hood. Trousers, socks, boots, t-shirt - no shower required.
LM needed to be in a woodland - to have trace of anything from it. To be under those nails and so forth - This is why LM met with the boys in the woods of Newbattle Abbey. And to be in company for that alibi.
No one knows exactly what was used for burning that night in the Mitchell garden.
The Mitchells had ample time to dispose of any means, remnants - the lot.
There was a fire going on at different intervals over the course of the evening
SM was out and about that evening, late. - found out to be so, not given freely. He claimed he was going for fuel? Many miles from home.
SM was/is a mechanic - is this were scrapyards come into play?
It is a fallacy to believe that the police could have arrived at the Mitchell home at any point
This girl had been left in a place that LM knew would not be easy to come across.
And he was right - Jodi was not discovered over the course of that evening.
LM knew exactly how much time he had.
If Jodi had been discovered - it would have been a time consuming process for Identity and so forth.
If LM had phoned back it would have raised the alarm.
If Jodi's mother had phoned him back - he would still have had ample time for all he was doing and had to do.
The ball was firmly in LM's court.
By the time LM was in the company of the boys from the Abbey the story of alibi was set and continuing.
The disposal by means of fire and so forth was happening at the same time.
LM stayed long enough with the boys and much shorter than the time he would usually be out.
There is nothing that puts LM home before 10pm when he was witnessed by his neighbour.
LM was prepped and ready for that inevitable contact from Jodi's parents.

Jodi Jones was reported missing around 10.50pm to the police.
LM was on/at RDP by 10.59pm
LM was still on RDP by around 11.20pm.
At around 11.25pm LM introduced the woodland into this search at the Gino spot.
At around 11.30pm LM again introduced the woodland into this search at the V break.
LM at this point physically entered the woodland.
LM turned immediately to his left - no unfamiliarity, no trepidation - nothing
LM seconds later, in the time it took SK and JaJ to walk around 10 steps - shouted out he had found something.
Jodi's body was more than 40ft down from this V in the woodland. Hidden behind this large oak he described and by the wall.
Behind the wall where she most definitely died - utter nonsense from Ms Lean and the sidekicks who claim the same.
LM could not have seen what he described - LM did not go near enough.

LM had all he could have covered by the time he was prepped and ready to offer to search. LM at this point did not have to distance himself from anything -
LM distanced himself from this once the police were involved. By leading them a merry dance on how to get to where they were.
By saying no to showing them were Jodi lay - LM had absolutely no problem before this with Jodi's family.
By denying all knowledge of  both the V and the woodland prior to that evening.
By denying to having walked any further than he claimed on Newbattle R'd
By denying that Jodi was banned from using this path alone.

These are clear facts: LM nor anyone had to be drenched blood. No one had to be jumping in showers. If this killer was aware enough of DNA implications (LM was, "they wanted me over that wall to get my DNA),then they were more than astute enough not to be trailing it into the house, or having showers. LM did not have to enter his house before 6pm - his house was detached. LM had ample time for that alibi story and all else - and what a story that was. Completely disintegrated bit by bit. From 5:05pm until 5:45pm - down to less than 15mins. - LM was not at home.

And we add on those sightings. And we add on that missing knife and Jacket. And every detail of that clothing right down to the red hair fastener and those DC shoes. And of a boy who was the complete opposite of being effected in the slightest. And we add on buying and viewing that dvd of that horrible depiction of that girl in the woods. We add on the incredulous tales of waiting around all that time, on an off chance of meeting in the first place. Then we add on this "not coming out" and this "I thought you had grounded her" - We add on the best way to kill someone, the skunting knives, the replacement, the parka.

And so much more - then we go to trial. And this Jury who heard those smokescreens around others.  Of being in the area, of presence of DNA - And we show the Jury those crime scene photos, and we take them to the locus. - And they go over this timescale. That woodland - and they see first hand - the impossibility of Jodi being discovered in less than 10:mins. And they watch this wee boy through this whole process - they do not see someone who was advised not to shout out - they see someone the complete opposite of his brother, of SK of this girls family. Telling someone not to shout out in court - is the complete opposite of suppressing natural emotion.

And this beyond a reasonable doubt - From this amazing discovery in less than 10:mins- to the other end of this evening and no alibi. And for every single thing in between - And every other single piece of damming evidence heaped on top of this. - Dam right it was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

And this is why the garden path is needed, this is why those smokescreens and pawns are required. To sway one's attention onto ludicrous thoughts - of not searching Mayfield. Of being drenched and toddling down a busy road. Of bleaching crime scenes, of claiming Jodi was murdered elsewhere, of every test being the wrong one. From the pathologist right down to the testing of that massive knife, clothing, boots of this claimed person of interest - Mr D. With those "no reportable results" - Not Jodi's blood. To continuously say "well we will never know,will we? as we do not know what they were being asked to test for?"

Does this "we do not know what they were being asked to test for", apply to the pathologist also now? Was he not asked to test for a TOD? - hook line and sinker.

TOD was not established through the usual methods….that was widely reported. That is an absolute fact and intriguing as  you hoped your post above to be if we have no definitive TOD then the movements of those on who suspicion fell in July 2003 add nothing to the case for or against guilt as the time margins are so finite.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Parky41

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #454 on: June 11, 2021, 12:36:02 PM »
Is he out looking for his choppers after a night on the razzle?

That's a shirt you owe me - soaked in coffee!  (&^&

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #455 on: June 11, 2021, 12:57:20 PM »
Lolly again:

And again - absolute nonsense. And exactly the mirror image of Ms Leans claims since day dot.

I stopped reading her blog after the 2 PI’s nonsense

It was obvious she was coming to the case from a tainted and biased standpoint

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #456 on: June 11, 2021, 12:58:27 PM »
TOD was not established through the usual methods….that was widely reported.

It’s not always possible to do so
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #457 on: June 11, 2021, 01:28:59 PM »
Lolly again:

And again - absolute nonsense. And exactly the mirror image of Ms Leans claims since day dot. Luke Mitchell would have to have been naked when he carried out his murder for to be wanting any "good long shower and scrub himself" - hook line and sinker.

Luke Mitchell was wearing a long jacket with a hood. And we have seen the evidence around this. Of exactly where Jodi met her final moments and the clear evidence that supports this. That whilst this killer would have had blood upon his clothing, it is a far cry from having that clothing drenched.

They clearly aren’t aware that sadly real life murders don’t look like they do on TV

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #458 on: June 11, 2021, 04:57:31 PM »
That parka easily left in the woodland at first (not the woodland strip, but next to his house)
LM knew exactly where any trace of the murder would be upon him.
He had ample means to wash this trace.
LM had up to 80:mins until he met with the boys for any further disposal, of setting that alibi in place.
The boys he met with gave evidence of how LM was not his usual unkempt self.
LM ankles were engrained with dirt, and hair that "appeared" to be greasy - for LM was covered. He had a parka style jacket on with a hood. Trousers, socks, boots, t-shirt - no shower required.
LM needed to be in a woodland - to have trace of anything from it. To be under those nails and so forth - This is why LM met with the boys in the woods of Newbattle Abbey. And to be in company for that alibi.
No one knows exactly what was used for burning that night in the Mitchell garden.
The Mitchells had ample time to dispose of any means, remnants - the lot.


Wasn’t Luke Mitchell mocking of the fact the bins had been collected by the council ?

He could have disposed of any of his items via neighbouring bins
« Last Edit: June 11, 2021, 05:01:47 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #459 on: June 11, 2021, 05:01:01 PM »


LM had up to 80:mins until he met with the boys for any further disposal, of setting that alibi in place.

Where can we see Luke Mitchell’s breakdown of what he allegedly did during this time period?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #460 on: June 11, 2021, 05:06:43 PM »
Lolly again:
t for", apply to the pathologist also now? Was he not asked to test for a TOD? - hook line and sinker.

Re Lolly ⬇️

Hello my name is Lolly Adams, I am a true crime researcher, writer and blogger. I work with a team to provide a range of services relating to true crime, particularly cold & unsolved cases and matters of cult & occult crime
My team and I are always keen to take a long hard look at cases that we become involved in and will pursue answers and justice wherever we can, no matter how long that takes.
The work of a true-crime researcher/investigator is not simple, by any means. We have to look at every possible piece of evidence and try, wherever possible to remain objective.
Of course, we must form an opinion about the case and build a hypothesis to work to as we research, but we must always remain open to change as evidence is gathered.
When a case comes to the desk, we will look at the basic evidence that we are presented with in the first instance then begin to ask questions in order to progress the case. The way that an investigation progresses depends very much on each individual case.
If you have a case that is unsolved, a cold case or something that is still very much active for you but, progress doesn't seem to be being made then get in touch and we will try to advise the best way forward
If you require the services of specialist writers, researchers, investigators or case reviewers in the field of true crime, then this is the site for you.
We specialise in cold cases, unsolved crime, unusual cases including religious cult crime and indoctrination. Check out our pages and see our wide range of services

https://www.lollytruecrimeworld.co.uk/447504126

Research
An in-depth research service where we undertake a full dive into any true crime case and assess it from its very beginning.
We will look at all information available publicly, apply for freedom of information requests and subject access requests from the authorities in order to gather as much data as possible.
Older cases can be more difficult to gain detailed information on but, we are very fortunate to have built a trusted group of contacts that can help us a great deal in putting a case together.
When our research is completed we provide a dossier of our findings, along with our opinion about the case. If the case is unsolved, as many are we will give our professional indications as to whether the case stands a chance of going on to be solved and indications as to any suspects.

https://www.lollytruecrimeworld.co.uk/447780445

 *&^^&
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #461 on: June 11, 2021, 05:09:23 PM »
Re Lolly ⬇️

Hello my name is Lolly Adams, I am a true crime researcher, writer and blogger. I work with a team to provide a range of services relating to true crime, particularly cold & unsolved cases and matters of cult & occult crime
My team and I are always keen to take a long hard look at cases that we become involved in and will pursue answers and justice wherever we can, no matter how long that takes.
The work of a true-crime researcher/investigator is not simple, by any means. We have to look at every possible piece of evidence and try, wherever possible to remain objective.
Of course, we must form an opinion about the case and build a hypothesis to work to as we research, but we must always remain open to change as evidence is gathered.
When a case comes to the desk, we will look at the basic evidence that we are presented with in the first instance then begin to ask questions in order to progress the case. The way that an investigation progresses depends very much on each individual case.
If you have a case that is unsolved, a cold case or something that is still very much active for you but, progress doesn't seem to be being made then get in touch and we will try to advise the best way forward
If you require the services of specialist writers, researchers, investigators or case reviewers in the field of true crime, then this is the site for you.
We specialise in cold cases, unsolved crime, unusual cases including religious cult crime and indoctrination. Check out our pages and see our wide range of services

https://www.lollytruecrimeworld.co.uk/447504126

Research
An in-depth research service where we undertake a full dive into any true crime case and assess it from its very beginning.
We will look at all information available publicly, apply for freedom of information requests and subject access requests from the authorities in order to gather as much data as possible.
Older cases can be more difficult to gain detailed information on but, we are very fortunate to have built a trusted group of contacts that can help us a great deal in putting a case together.
When our research is completed we provide a dossier of our findings, along with our opinion about the case. If the case is unsolved, as many are we will give our professional indications as to whether the case stands a chance of going on to be solved and indications as to any suspects.

https://www.lollytruecrimeworld.co.uk/447780445

 *&^^&

And for someone with an alleged interest in ‘cults’ she doesn’t appear to know a whole lot about them ⬇️


For many years now I have held an interest in  cults and religious sects that really should, in my opinion, not be operating. https://www.lollytruecrimeworld.co.uk/449314761


And it seems Jared Adam’s blog has been ‘removed’ https://jaradadamsuk.blogspot.com/

Lolly True Crime World is excited to be part of a 4-way collaboration in early 2021 between ourselves, our consultant Jarad Adams and two podcast teams Jury room Podcast and two ladies know as Crime Time Nerds.


Our consultant "Jarad Adams" is currently assisting us with the case of the missing youngster from Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire,. He is working closely with a local true crime researcher Michael Nolan, hoping that we can stop the young woman being quietly forgotten as so many are.
https://www.lollytruecrimeworld.co.uk/447895572

Jared Adam’s states here https://uk.linkedin.com/in/jarad-adams-8360751b4

About
‘Hi, my name is Jarad, I am 50, born and bred in North London UK. I am married to Lolly and have spent most of my life writing and researching.
I started adult life studying criminology, then took a complete turn and went back to study screenwriting and film making.
I have spent a number of years working for and on behalf of TV and documentary makers but now decided the time is right to go out on my own freelance as a screenwriter and casting director.
My work is mostly home-based working remotely but of course, I am always available to be on set when and where needed.
I do not work for free, I do not work for a pittance, although I am willing to undertake pro bono work in exceptional cases. I am a professional and expect to be paid accordingly.
The future looks positive as I am in the process of taking a partnership with a production company, which is very exciting, something I can really develop on.
Most recently I have started writing a blog of cold & unsolved cold cases in the UK and exploring the mysteries that surround them.
I am not the sort of person to take a simple answer if I doubt I will ask and I always investigate all true crime cases thoroughly, whether it be for a documentary, film, TV or a blog.
I am now in the process of collaborating with a renowned international psychic investigator in making a documentary series covering UK unsolved true crime cases.
If you have story that you would like me to look at or you'd like to see a true crime case turned into a documentary, docu-drama or a movie do get in touch:
jaradcoldcases@protonmail.com or
jarad.adams@lollytruecrime.co.uk
I am also on Twitter: https://twitter.com/adams_jarad
You won't find me on Facebook, it's full of time-wasters and rudeness so I stay well away
Look forward to chatting soon, take care and sty safe!

« Last Edit: June 11, 2021, 05:20:43 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #462 on: June 11, 2021, 05:33:09 PM »
Sandra Lean (today)

Well, well, imagine MPs telling lies. Remember all of you who received letters saying they can't possibly interfere with the justice system or talk about individual cases? They just did:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jun/10/scottish-tory-msp-george-beattie-case-scotland?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

If they can do it for this case (which absolutely deserves it, obviously), then ....


Conservative MP & journalist Russell Findlay no doubt knows quite a bit about Sandra Leans shenanigans ⬇️


Miscarriages of justice charity stripped of lottery funding
“A charity that fights wrongful convictions has had its National Lottery funding stopped and is being probed by the Scottish Government over concerns about how it is run.
The Miscarriage of Justice Organisation - known as MOJO - was awarded £120,000 by the lottery's community fund but the offer has been withdrawn.
A National Lottery Community Fund spokesperson said: "Due to ongoing governance issues, we are unable to provide MOJO with funding at this time. We welcome a further conversation with them once these issues have been addressed.
"The decision to offer the award of £120,000 was made in April 2019. Our formal withdrawal letter was issued this week."
Glasgow-based MOJO was formed by Paddy Hill, one of six men wrongly convicted of the IRA pub bombings in Birmingham in 1975.
MOJO is due to receive £105,000 of taxpayers' money from the Scottish Government this year with at least as much agreed for each of the next two years.
The government's criminal justice division has begun an investigation, with a spokesman saying: "The Scottish Government provides funding to MOJO Scotland to provide support to people who may have suffered a miscarriage of justice.
"Concerns have been raised with us about their governance and management structures, which are currently subject to an investigation."
Hill launched the charity in 2001 and it is run by volunteers and two paid employees. One of them, Paul McLaughlin, is on sick leave. He declined to comment.
Management committee member Colin Grant said: "It's got to the stage now where I think MOJO has possibly gone too far, I think it's possibly imploded so much it may well be beyond salvation.
My understanding is that a charity which is receiving public funds needs to have an independent management committee to oversee how these funds are being used to make sure they are being used properly and at the moment there isn't a functioning management committee there."
Scottish Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie MSP, a MOJO director since 2011, didn't respond to an STV News interview request.
Governance issues arose in April when volunteer and "head of legal" Euan McIlvride attempted to change the charity's constitution.
Management committee members, including company secretary and director Billy McAllister, blocked the move and called for independent legal advice.
McAllister also raised concerns about whether it would be appropriate to offer paid employment to McIlvride due to a previous conviction for embezzlement while working as a solicitor.
Three new directors were appointed - including Hill's partner Tara Babel - and McAllister was voted out while on holiday.
Grant said after the April meeting "all hell broke loose", adding: "Billy, who has been a director of the organisation and secretary, was summarily dismissed without any consultation [and] the co-project manager Paul McLaughlin was effectively demoted.
"The lottery funding which we'd been promised was stopped. The lottery fund decided to not give us any more money because of the problems we were having within the organisation structurally.
"The Scottish Government have now launched an investigation into how MOJO is being run and none of that was communicated to the management committee - we all learned this from outside sources."
McIlvride told STV News McAllister was removed "entirely in compliance with the relevant legislation" and because of "serious failures and misconduct in the exercise of his roles... and for separate misconduct in the form of bullying and intimidation of staff and volunteers in the organisation".
He added: "It is entirely untrue to suggest, as you appear to do, that Mr McAllister was removed as a result of his raising concerns about myself. My entire history was disclosed to MOJO... in advance of my volunteering with the organisation."
McAllister, who denies the allegations, said: "I think they saw me as the main instigator to getting the concerns raised and they went after me. I have been forced out without any due process and I feel bitter about that because I've given seven or eight years of my time for nothing.
"As a famous football manager once said, there's no man bigger than the club and I think I said that to them - the organisation was bigger than any one person.
"I would like MOJO to return to how it was... an open, democratic and accountable structure."
Grant added: "One of the most ironic things about MOJO is that it was set up to try and provide victims of miscarriage of justice with a voice and yet the way it's been behaving with regard to Billy McAllister and Paul McLaughlin shows that it doesn't actually practise what it preaches because it's denied them justice."
Hill also declined to be interviewed but in a statement said McIlvride "made no secret" of his conviction and called him "honest and reliable".
He added: "As far as our clients are concerned, many have expressed their gratitude for all of Mr McIlvride's efforts in helping them and have confidence in the work he is undertaking on their behalf."
McIlvride was convicted of fraud and embezzlement but some charges were later overturned on appeal.
He said: "Given that I spent a period of time in prison as a result of miscarriage of justice, I personally think that my experience is one which enhances my suitability for the role that I exercise with this organisation."
'Giving false hope to people'
A campaigner fighting to overturn a high-profile murder conviction has accused MOJO of betraying potential miscarriages of justice victims.
Dr Sandra Lean said it was "really exciting" when MOJO asked to get involved with Luke Mitchell case two years ago.
Mitchell was jailed for the 2003 murder of Jodi Jones, 14, but continues to protest his innocence.
Lean said: "It was really exciting news. It looked like the case was getting picked up again, it looked like there was going to be some real progress here."
However, last month Mitchell's mother Corinne blasted MOJO for "doing nothing" since taking on her son's case and recovered his case files from their office.
Lean told STV News: "Part of the problem was the promises being made were not being kept. The case review itself was something of a farce. There was no central strategy. There was no planned route to how this review was going to take place.
"The idea of having the Luke Mitchell case, this huge case on their books, was good publicity for them."
The campaigners say that the alleged failings may have harmed Mitchell's case.
Lean added: "I was going to say it's a disaster but if they're not doing the work, they're giving false hope to people and that, in the circumstances these people are in, that it shocking, that is dreadful.
"I believe that some real damage has been done. There are a couple of things that should have been acted on very quickly, that were not and in spite of a number of promptings, a number of questions, a number of attempts to get something done, there just didn't seem to be the will to do what needed doing and some of that now means that routes forward that should have been available may no longer be available."
In response, McIlvride said: "We are aware of the criticism recently levelled at us by Mrs Corrine Mitchell.
"We do not consider it justified, but would not propose to rehearse the arguments in the context of what is, essentially, an unwarranted attack on myself, and, worse, the charity, by parties who are motivated to do us harm."

https://stv.tv/news/west-central/1439054-miscarriages-of-justice-charity-stripped-of-lottery-funding/
« Last Edit: June 11, 2021, 05:38:34 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #463 on: June 11, 2021, 05:41:32 PM »
SM was out and about that evening, late. - found out to be so, not given freely. He claimed he was going for fuel? Many miles from home.
SM was/is a mechanic - is this were scrapyards come into play?

Would be interesting to see the transcripts of Shane Mitchell’s police interviews and his witness statements - in full
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?
« Reply #464 on: June 11, 2021, 05:53:42 PM »

Jodi Jones was reported missing around 10.50pm to the police.
LM was on/at RDP by 10.59pm
LM was still on RDP by around 11.20pm..

Where was he between 10:00pm (When he was seen walking outside past his neighbour house) and 10:41pm (When he was outside somewhere) when he received JuJ’s first test message ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation