Sharon Indy Sunshine - Updated Group Description Tue 14.04
“ This is a group fighting for an independent review inquiry to end the speculation for Jodi Jones and Luke Mitchell, not a crime solving group!”
I wonder what prompted this?
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/jodie-jones-family-slam-stickers-24318782
I think one is probably correct - the mere fact that no name of family member has been given, should be enough to tell people that this has not come directly from Jodi's immediate family. The point made however is bang on the money.
This campaigner - whom not once from all I have read, has ever contacted any member of this girls family. She claims to, under this complete false premise to have written "The true story of the murder of Jodi Jones". She has since time began on this, and I will say it again, because it is stark in its reality - had some personal beef around why, in her opinion - this girls family were not given the same treatment by the police and media - as the Mitchell family. That while in one hand, claims the treatment of the Mitchell family was wrong, that in her opinion there was a clear case of double standards - and the hypocrisy, yet again of going about things in such a way - that the results, from the few brain cells out there, are doing exactly what it says on her tin of a book - by giving this girls family the treatment, these people feel they deserve. - In what is without a shadow of a doubt - double standards.
This back up bleat of falseness - Of not wanting the same to happen to others as happened to the Mitchells is a Joke. There is clearly a vendetta of sorts. And it is more than fair to say - that the books which led into the documentaries, podcasts and so forth - are the direct cause of this. And it is clearly by way of "half truths. misinformation and downright lies" - that clear hypocrisy and contradiction in attempting to call Jane Hamilton out for this. - And how does Ms Lean know, that not one single picture/poster has been put up anywhere in Midlothian, Edinburgh is classed as Midlothian, is it not? - furthermore. this clear divide, this split by these campaigners, these fall outs - Ms Lean can not make a statement, that she can not know to be fact. _ She is in control of nothing. - This divide of CM backing some whilst others are backing Ms Lean.
And of this vendetta?? - From a person. Whom had without a shadow of doubt. Became involved with the Mitchells in 2003. Had declared LM as not being responsible, when she became interested in the murder of Jodi Jones. And from that moment with media articles and all else, along with the Mitchells discussed whom they felt may have been responsible for her death?
And from here. From peoples belief and perception that some well known expert in the field of criminology - is trusted, that she must be correct in what she has said and done - That it all must be true with this naive bleat of "no-one has taken any action against her"? - this is on par with LM's awareness of DNA implications. - That everything by book has been done by that fine line - Of knowing exactly where that cross over to liable begins. -Sneaky, intelligent and deliberate? For there has been far more said on forums over time. Under many guises and most definitely from those long time faithful followers. Scouring and trolling every person involved in this case. Every discussion where able to - to ram those opinions down one's throat.
One would get the correct impression would they not - that this use of a sunflower on the front of IB, these posters of Jodi going up in the fight for LM, this blatant take over of this girl, her death and all else - is a hateful prod directly at Jodi's immediate family is it not? - That these people who have put blind faith in this campaign. Who are blaming Jodi's mother, brother, sister, grandmother, aunts and all else for LM's incarceration - These puppets, peddling the wares that in effect come directly from LM himself. This clear case of double standards - When there is nothing other than these half truths and clear misrepresentation of the actual facts in this case - that no doubt stemmed from as early as 2003. Does Ms Lean not class this "WE" she mentions as the very spreaders of lies, half truths and misinformation" Nicholas has already put up many of the comments.
So yes, in effect. By using this sunflower on the book, by using this girls picture - by having no right at all to take over anything to do with this girl - This charade of truth and Justice - is a Joke. There is nothing truthful or Just about it. Ms Lean, IM humble O - is a fraud. The nerve, the hypocrisy and that contradiction of calling, yet again Jane Hamilton out, when one backs every single lie, every half truth and every single piece of misinformation as a direct result of her, of all she has touted out - With that completely false premise of using Jodi Jones, by claiming to tell the "True story" of her murder. - It is LM's story, onto CM and ultimately put together by Ms Lean - it is their version of some twisted format, of what they class as truth. One must end this with - One would not know the truth if it were to smack one directly between the eyes!
