Yes. As I said I lived in the same town. I watched the C5 doc and it brought everything back that happened in 2003. I went on Facebook and found Sandra and the official Facebook group. They invited me to be a moderator and I accepted. I wanted to know more about the case than just believing the doc. They made out to me that the group was as much for Jodi as it was for Luke. They got fed up of my trying to protect jodi’s name. I didn't want to join the podcasts the made either. I found it really distasteful, I still do. I wanted to help with lots of things and I had my own ideas. When I began questioning them about their plans and actions they all blocked my and threw me out of the group.
I have learned so many terrible things about their behaviour since, such as the threat was made to Jane Hamilton, the stickering and poster campaigns. I also learned that Dr Lean isn't who she appears to be.
I listen to Sandras weekly updates but im not part of any of the groups. I assume you were the moderator she said left the group in her recent update? Sorry I have lots of questions too. For them to say you are focusing too much on [Name removed] is crazy, that’s the whole point of the case, yes its about Luke, is he guilty or not but focus should also be about [Name removed], have we got the right person behind bars, if any doubt it needs checked to ensure we got proper justice for her and her family. Ive not seen any of the stuff being said about [Name removed] family, but its disgusting if they are still getting trolled, it goes back to the days of the old WAP forum and seems its never changed just got worse. I’ve also heard about a threat made to JH, but ive not seen it. What was said, was this someone in the group mouthing off or was this a serious threat made to JH? Is any action being taken? Why did Sandra deny this happened, was it a private chat or a public statement? These groups are set up to help Luke & Jodi but from what I can see they are not doing a very good job, It seems there is trouble in the ranks at the moment. .You say the group do exactly as they are ordered to, who is the person doing the ordering, is that Sandra? In what why is she not what she appears to be? I think the Doc did a great job to get the case back in the public eye, but with that comes the idiots unfortunately! Sandra has stuck with this case for many years, I do not see anything she has got back from this (financially or otherwise) for her to not be 100% genuine, it would be such a shame if these people undo her hard work, on the other hand if she is not what she appears (not sure what you mean by that exactly) please enlighten us so we do not fall into the same trap or can get out of it if we already have!
