Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?

[rulesapply]

Thanks

So did Sandra Lean also ‘meet up for coffee’ with Mark Kane?

I suspect we'll never know but Mark Kane's letter always gave me the impression they'd met. However, it's just an impression. I have nothing to definitively show they did.

[Paranoid Android]

At about 10.50 minutes into this video there's an explanation.

https://youtu.be/RGhh114oQBw

Don't think there would be much unusual about MK being on Newbattle Road given that he was resident at Newbattle Abbey College - the college entrance opens onto Newbattle Road.

[rulesapply]

Don't think there would be much unusual about MK being on Newbattle Road given that he was resident at Newbattle Abbey College - the college entrance opens onto Newbattle Road.

I agree. I think it would be an unlikely case of mistaken identity too given that MK and LM didn't look alike.

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean:

 ‘….and to see him him still being slagged off to this day for doing the right thing I thinks says everything that needs to be said about this case if we’re being totally honest

So what does Sandra Lean say about Scott Forbes ‘assaulting’ Mark Kane? ⬇️

He assaulted me in full view of half a dozen people after I had left a comment on Ms.Leans web pag. All of this I reported to the police.

[Nicholas]

I agree. I think it would be an unlikely case of mistaken identity too given that MK and LM didn't look alike.

They definitely didn’t look alike

That PI’s conformation bias made him sound rather foolish during the TV show 🙄

[rulesapply]

They definitely didn’t look alike

That PI’s conformation bias made him sound rather foolish during the TV show 🙄

And if Mark Kane was on Newbattle Road at the crucial time then why didn't any witnesses see a boy AND a man? Why didn't the boys who knew LM from school and positively identified him not see MK too. He wasn't hiding because according to Dr. Lean, some witnesses did see him. Did the boy and man see each other? All I know for sure is LM was there. Positively identified.

[Nicholas]

And if Mark Kane was on Newbattle Road at the crucial time then why didn't any witnesses see a boy AND a man? Why didn't the boys who knew LM from school and positively identified him not see MK too. He wasn't hiding because according to Dr. Lean, some witnesses did see him. Did the boy and man see each other? All I know for sure is LM was there. Positively identified.

 

[faithlilly]

Undoubtedly disrespectful.

What do you believe? Innocence? Or Guilt?

That’s the wrong question. Was Luke’s guilt proved beyond reasonable doubt? Undoubtedly not….and several of the jury, after hearing all the evidence, agreed.

[Nicholas]

Thanks

I’ve transcribed what she says about Scott Forbes ⬇️

Sandra Lean: ‘Now what I have to tell you is when I finally got access to the case papers every single thing - with the exception of the essay - every single thing that Scott Forbes said was backed up by the information in the case papers
So the scratches on Mark Kane’s face Scott Forbes was not the only witness to those the agitated behaviour he was not the only witness to those
Mark kane being on the new battle road that night which Scott actually didn’t say because Mark Kane couldn’t remember where he was the information about him being on the newbattle road that night was in the case files from other witnesses so I wanted to get that absolutely cleared up once and for all

Excerpt from IB (screenshot on Fb)
“Two other witness statements supported Mr Forbes claims that Mr Kane had facial injuries, gave conflicting accounts about how they came about and was acting strangely the day after the murder”

[rulesapply]

Excerpt from IB (screenshot on Fb)
“Two other witness statements supported Mr Forbes claims that Mr Kane had facial injuries, gave conflicting accounts about how they came about and was acting strangely the day after the murder”

So, are there two now? What happened to the other three?

[Rusty]

So, are there two now? What happened to the other three?

As new questions are posed, querying these things. Excuses are made up as they go along. The normal default position is used, unnamed witnesses, I have the papers, it is all there. Now take my word for it, or your banned. And people fall for this excuse time and time again. Mind boggling that people take this stuff as gospel without seeing the evidence.

Show the people the evidence Ms Lean..

[TruthSeeker2003]

 

She denied his involvement a couple of weeks ago!!!!! 

[TruthSeeker2003]

That’s the wrong question. Was Luke’s guilt proved beyond reasonable doubt? Undoubtedly not….and several of the jury, after hearing all the evidence, agreed.

Can you give me a source for this information? Website? Newspaper article?Screenshots?

[rulesapply]

Excerpt from IB (screenshot on Fb)
“Two other witness statements supported Mr Forbes claims that Mr Kane had facial injuries, gave conflicting accounts about how they came about and was acting strangely the day after the murder”

I'm interested in when these witness statements were given to the police. I believe these witnesses are connected to the college. Dr. Lean tells us that no one at the college was spoken to at the time of poor Jodi's murder. Are these another two who waited almost three years to tell the police of their grave concerns despite the brutal murder of a child? Do you have any idea when they gave their statements please?

[faithlilly]

Can you give me a source for this information? Website? Newspaper article?Screenshots?

What information would you like a source for?