Is DR Sandra Lean a credible source?

[TruthSeeker2003]

Your reference to the jury. No thinking he was guilty. He was found guilty. Curious if you have come across information that contradicts the conviction.

[faithlilly]

Your reference to the jury. No thinking he was guilty. He was found guilty. Curious if you have come across information that contradicts the conviction.

He was convicted by a majority therefore logic tells us that several of the jury were not convinced of Luke’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt….perhaps as many as 7.

[rulesapply]

So what does Sandra Lean say about Scott Forbes ‘assaulting’ Mark Kane? ⬇️

Yeah, Scott Forbes,  The Doer of the Right Thing.

[TruthSeeker2003]

The need to tweet about this case so much concerns me. Especially if he worked on the case himself.

[TruthSeeker2003]

He was convicted by a majority therefore logic tells us that several of the jury were not convinced of Luke’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt….perhaps as many as 7.

How do we determine what the numbers are? I was lead to believe by Sandra that the exact figures aren't known even by her. It's not something that the person convicted is told. Is that correct?
Modify message

[faithlilly]

How do we determine what the numbers are? I was lead to believe by Sandra that the exact figures aren't known even by her. It's not something that the person convicted is told. Is that correct?

I’m not particularly knowledgeable about Scottish law but I believe that to be the case. Of course my suggestion is just that, a suggestion but still absolutely possible.

[rulesapply]

The need to tweet about this case so much concerns me. Especially if he worked on the case himself.

The need to lash out at Kane, (deceased,) Jane Hamilton, Dobbie, Kane's mother, (a different tweet,)  so viciously makes SF seem as if he has a bit of a temper.

[Rusty]

How do we determine what the numbers are? I was lead to believe by Sandra that the exact figures aren't known even by her. It's not something that the person convicted is told. Is that correct?
Modify message

We can't know, we'll never know. Anyone that tries to promote the numbers as gospel is a fantasist, trying to push an agenda.

[Nicholas]

So, are there two now? What happened to the other three?

She went on

“A third witness stated that a colleague with whom she worked in the collage told her a similar story (She was unaware of the other witnesses’ accounts) and gave the name of the colleague who witnessed it directly. The colleague was never asked for a statement.

Therefore, three further aspects of Scott Forbes’ accounts were substantiated by evidence the Crown claimed did not exist.

[Nicholas]

As new questions are posed, querying these things. Excuses are made up as they go along. The normal default position is used, unnamed witnesses, I have the papers, it is all there. Now take my word for it, or your banned. And people fall for this excuse time and time again. Mind boggling that people take this stuff as gospel without seeing the evidence.

Show the people the evidence Ms Lean..

It really is

[Nicholas]

And if Mark Kane was on Newbattle Road at the crucial time then why didn't any witnesses see a boy AND a man? Why didn't the boys who knew LM from school and positively identified him not see MK too. He wasn't hiding because according to Dr. Lean, some witnesses did see him. Did the boy and man see each other? All I know for sure is LM was there. Positively identified.

Who?

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from IB (screenshot on Fb)
“Two other witness statements supported Mr Forbes claims that Mr Kane had facial injuries, gave conflicting accounts about how they came about and was acting strangely the day after the murder”

I'm interested in when these witness statements were given to the police. I believe these witnesses are connected to the college. Dr. Lean tells us that no one at the college was spoken to at the time of poor Jodi's murder. Are these another two who waited almost three years to tell the police of their grave concerns despite the brutal murder of a child? Do you have any idea when they gave their statements please?

Me too. I’d like to know on what date these statements were given

I’d also like to know if these two used the words ‘acting strangely’ and had they been influenced by Scott Forbes or someone he had spoken to in anyway

I suspect they were

She went on

“A third witness stated that a colleague with whom she worked in the collage told her a similar story (She was unaware of the other witnesses’ accounts) and gave the name of the colleague who witnessed it directly. The colleague was never asked for a statement.

Therefore, three further aspects of Scott Forbes’ accounts were substantiated by evidence the Crown claimed did not 3xist.

[faithlilly]

We can't know, we'll never know. Anyone that tries to promote the numbers as gospel is a fantasist, trying to push an agenda.

Isn’t it excellent then that nobody has.

[Nicholas]

Yeah, Scott Forbes,  The Doer of the Right Thing.

And Sandra Lean wonders why he wasn’t a reliable witness 

[Nicholas]

Yeah, Scott Forbes,  The Doer of the Right Thing.

As you say

Where are these other witnesses Scott Forbes bangs on about ?

There are only 3 mentioned by Sandra Lean and without seeing the actual statements - it’s not possible to trust her interpretation on anything