Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
I feel duty bound. I exhumed several threads and the 5 of us regurgitated all the old tropes in a nolstagically grotesque way.
But when (or if) a big break occurs we'll be here to batter and alienate all the newcomers, and 50% of the 5 of us will be gloating and the other half getting banned.
I for one can't wait.

Posters on this Forum don't get Banned. There is always a way without that happening. In fact there has only ever been One, which in itself was an ultimate tragedy.
2
The forum is dying and has been for years, but its not your responsibility to keep it alive so just relax and let it slip away peacefully - until something momentous happens, then watch it jolt back into life like Frankensteins Monster. .
I feel duty bound. I exhumed several threads and the 5 of us regurgitated all the old tropes in a nolstagically grotesque way.
But when (or if) a big break occurs we'll be here to batter and alienate all the newcomers, and 50% of the 5 of us will be gloating and the other half getting banned.
I for one can't wait.
3
Look, this forum is dying until a development breaks. Yes, you've got the Luke Littler case to keep a handful occupied, but unless we inject some intrigue and jeopardy it will just remain a voluminous repository of pointless argument and a relic to be exhumed as an example of 21st century futility and an uinwitting social science experiment.
At least the sausages on CMOMM act on their illogical convictions; they've wrote to the incumbent Home Secretary, the Chief Constable of the Met and Lorraine Kelly.
I think it's only right and proper that one of the resident cranks here write to the McCanns reprising them of your conclusions. It might help, who knows? Yes, they might get arrested or become the recipient of a super-injuction or something, but at least we can give the CMOMMers a bloody nose.
Heck, even Bernt Sausagebanger has wriiten a book, been up to Rocha Negra, found Maddie's grave, then alerted the authorities. Action is required now I think, less talk.
The forum is dying and has been for years, but its not your responsibility to keep it alive so just relax and let it slip away peacefully - until something momentous happens, then watch it jolt back into life like Frankensteins Monster. .
4
  As theres only two and a half of us morons who support the abduction theory I dont really think there is a prevailing view other than that Madeleine was abducted.  In the same way that none of you expert know-it-all sceptics have anything approaching a consensus on who did what to whom and why and where and when apart from the McCanns dunnit.  And why do you imagine its incumbent on any of us to harass the McCanns by informing them of our views?   
Youre knocking nothing down matey, least of all me.  Try not to be so unpleasant, youre much nicer and more reasonable when you havent got an audience
Look, this forum is dying until a development breaks. Yes, you've got the Luke Littler case to keep a handful occupied, but unless we inject some intrigue and jeopardy it will just remain a voluminous repository of pointless argument and a relic to be exhumed as an example of 21st century futility and an uinwitting social science experiment.
At least the sausages on CMOMM act on their illogical convictions; they've wrote to the incumbent Home Secretary, the Chief Constable of the Met and Lorraine Kelly.
I think it's only right and proper that one of the resident cranks here write to the McCanns reprising them of your conclusions. It might help, who knows? Yes, they might get arrested or become the recipient of a super-injuction or something, but at least we can give the CMOMMers a bloody nose.
Heck, even Bernt Sausagebanger has wriiten a book, been up to Rocha Negra, found Maddie's grave, then alerted the authorities. Action is required now I think, less talk.
5
It?s not whether you?ve been defrauded by if Dr Lean has committed fraud. You seem to think that she has and no doubt libel and slander so why not report her to the police? Or are you all mouth and no trousers? Does your bravery only extend as far as your anonymity does?
Your post seems a bit disjointed and as I've already said, stop telling me what to do to. You overestimate how much it bothers me replying to a week old comment within a few hours suggests you're overly invested. Why not phone Scams UK saying you believed a book written by a fake criminologist/part-time van driver and ask for your ?19.99 back (plus P&P).

You seem on the brink. What stage of grief/denial are you at after however many years of promoting the Dr Lean Lie. I'll pop back in a week or so, so need for bated breath (baited would involve bait/lure).
6
Stop telling me and others what to do. If I want to highlight Lean's dishonesty this is as good a place as any to do it. I never bought her book so can't go to the police saying I've been defrauded because it turns out it was load of lies the average person could have spotted a mile off. Buyer beware, of fake criminologists bearing false truths.

It?s not whether you?ve been defrauded by if Dr Lean has committed fraud. You seem to think that she has and no doubt libel and slander so why not report her to the police? Or are you all mouth and no trousers? Does your bravery only extend as far as your anonymity does?
7
The prevailing notion here was that he skipped town and hot-footed it across Europe in his Shitstream caravan.
We've established this wasn't true. You guys keep linin' 'em up, I'll keep knockin' 'em down.
He's not your hobo. Not this time.
It might be time for you or Lace or....the other one to drop Gerry and Kate a line though and tell them you're sure Brueckner snatched and killed their daughter, as they don't seem to think that's the case. Might be awkward, mind.
  As theres only two and a half of us morons who support the abduction theory I dont really think there is a prevailing view other than that Madeleine was abducted.  In the same way that none of you expert know-it-all sceptics have anything approaching a consensus on who did what to whom and why and where and when apart from the McCanns dunnit.  And why do you imagine its incumbent on any of us to harass the McCanns by informing them of our views?   
Youre knocking nothing down matey, least of all me.  Try not to be so unpleasant, youre much nicer and more reasonable when you havent got an audience
8
So he ran nowhere and from this we must deduce hes innocent.  Marvellous logic, well done Inspector Clouseau.
Incidentally, Im not surprised they didntt find him at his last known location but I would like to know why, if they thought he was a person of interest, they didnt make any attempt to try and locate him after the initial visit.  Probably cbaed and anyway, much less effort to go after the parents.

nb: I can no longer produce grammatical sentences on this forum owing to the ongoing glitch which now only seems to be affecting my posts.
The prevailing notion here was that he skipped town and hot-footed it across Europe in his Shitstream caravan.
We've established this wasn't true. You guys keep linin' 'em up, I'll keep knockin' 'em down.
He's not your hobo. Not this time.
It might be time for you or Lace or....the other one to drop Gerry and Kate a line though and tell them you're sure Brueckner snatched and killed their daughter, as they don't seem to think that's the case. Might be awkward, mind.
9
Stop bleating about it here and take some action. I wait with baited breath.

Stop telling me and others what to do. If I want to highlight Lean's dishonesty this is as good a place as any to do it. I never bought her book so can't go to the police saying I've been defrauded because it turns out it was load of lies the average person could have spotted a mile off. Buyer beware, of fake criminologists bearing false truths.

10
You resolved your own statement there; an itinerant with no fixed abode and you're surprised they didn't find him at his last known location? We now know he ran nowhere and only started his Hash in the Attic enterprise some months later.
And you need to be a tad more creative with your similes.
So he ran nowhere and from this we must deduce hes innocent.  Marvellous logic, well done Inspector Clouseau.
Incidentally, Im not surprised they didntt find him at his last known location but I would like to know why, if they thought he was a person of interest, they didnt make any attempt to try and locate him after the initial visit.  Probably cbaed and anyway, much less effort to go after the parents.

nb: I can no longer produce grammatical sentences on this forum owing to the ongoing glitch which now only seems to be affecting my posts. 
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10