Author Topic: The New Yorker Article  (Read 614 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Venturi Swirl

"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
  • Total likes: 797
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: The New Yorker Article
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2024, 11:39:38 AM »
I've   just read it !   I haven't kept up with the JB case for ages, but I thought it was a well written/researched article.

The "New Yorker"  also did an article on Lucy Letby recently, and that seems to have caused a great deal of "noise".

I don't know how much of the info re JB is actually new.  I guess the more time passes, the more difficult it will be to prove what really happened at WHF that night. After all this time, I wouldn't like to say whether or not JB is guilty.




Offline Jayneykul

Re: The New Yorker Article
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2024, 01:16:35 PM »
I haven’t read it all but if it’s anything like the horse manure they posted on the Lucy Letby case it’s not worth taking up my time! Cant understand why Emma Kenny is giving it any credence