I think you might very well have done just that. Unless you provide a list of what aroused the initial suspicion.
List please, you must surely have one.
I have already posted the problems with the testimony of McCann, Tanner & Wilkins, which the PJ wanted to clarify during a reconstitution;
The physical, real and effective proximity between Jane Tanner, Gerald McCann and Jeremy Wilkins, at the moment when the first person walked by them, and which coincided with the sighting of the supposed suspect, carrying a child. It results, in our perspective, strange that neither Gerald McCann nor Jeremy Wilkins saw her, or the alleged abductor, despite the exiguity of the space and the peacefulness of the area
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htmIt seems the PJ weren't prepared, like Dave Edgar was, to accept different versions of the tale. Jane Tanner made police statements as to where the two men were speaking, and this 'reconstruction' ignored her opinion and that of Jes Wilkins. No wonder Gerry McCann became the spokesman; he was quite prepared to overrule other witnesses when it suited him.
Here he is overruling most of his friend's testimonies;
On Wednesday night, 2 May 2007, as well as he and his wife, he thinks that DP also went to his apartment to confirm that his children were well, not having reported to him any abnormal situation with the children.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm