Author Topic: Why now?  (Read 29218 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #540 on: December 03, 2021, 06:49:06 PM »
Different names for different processes.
Perhaps you could supply a cite to prove your point?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #541 on: December 03, 2021, 06:50:36 PM »
Taken from Websleuths and certainly worth a watch.  This guy (no idea who he is) seems to be describing a certain someone to a tee, and this was back in 2007

https://youtu.be/IdMZluF6Qcc
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why now?
« Reply #542 on: December 03, 2021, 06:51:31 PM »
The same old tired arguments are only yours.  There are no other others.  You have proof of nothing.

And your comments are now coming close to Libel.  Which I will fight if I must.

Never underestimate me.  You are one very nasty woman who lies to make a point.

Personal insults, as you know, are against forum rules. Your insult is also untrue. It's a fact that three people disagreed about the location of a meeting between two of them on 3rd May 2007. Jane Tanner definitely changed what she said here;

JT leaves table, and sees GM talking with fellow resident ("Jez" Wilkins) outside the patio gate of 5A. The two were standing just up the hill from the gate towards Rua A. da Silva Road.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIME_LINE_3_MAY_07.htm

To what she said here;

I thought they were sort of more near the little alleyway.  I think sort of”
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE_TANNER_RIGATORY.htm

She moved the two men 20 feet south, away from the gate.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Why now?
« Reply #543 on: December 03, 2021, 06:53:09 PM »
Different names for different processes.

And so easy to use when it suits you.

I never Report any of your opposing Comments.  So why do you feel the need to do so to me?

Gunit has just reported me for insulting her.  If only.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Why now?
« Reply #544 on: December 03, 2021, 06:54:38 PM »
And so easy to use when it suits you.

I never Report any of your opposing Comments.  So why do you feel the need to do so to me?

Gunit has just reported me for insulting her.  If only.

You called her a very nasty woman & a liar FFS.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #545 on: December 03, 2021, 06:55:22 PM »
Personal insults, as you know, are against forum rules. Your insult is also untrue. It's a fact that three people disagreed about the location of a meeting between two of them on 3rd May 2007. Jane Tanner definitely changed what she said here;

JT leaves table, and sees GM talking with fellow resident ("Jez" Wilkins) outside the patio gate of 5A. The two were standing just up the hill from the gate towards Rua A. da Silva Road.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIME_LINE_3_MAY_07.htm

To what she said here;

I thought they were sort of more near the little alleyway.  I think sort of”
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE_TANNER_RIGATORY.htm

She moved the two men 20 feet south, away from the gate.
Who cares?  No one of any consequence.  Time to get out of the jungle and accept the war is over.  Truly.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Eleanor

Re: Why now?
« Reply #546 on: December 03, 2021, 06:56:52 PM »
You called her a very nasty woman & a liar FFS.

Good.  I am glad that you got that one right.  Report me.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why now?
« Reply #547 on: December 03, 2021, 06:59:10 PM »
Perhaps you could supply a cite to prove your point?

In Portugal as in France;

In French criminal law, the reconstitution is a reconstruction of all or part of a crime involving the accused and/or witnesses and takes place at the scene of the crime.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10439463.2013.784294
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Why now?
« Reply #548 on: December 03, 2021, 07:21:13 PM »
In Portugal as in France;

In French criminal law, the reconstitution is a reconstruction of all or part of a crime involving the accused and/or witnesses and takes place at the scene of the crime.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10439463.2013.784294

And you know nothing of French Criminal Law.  When was the last time you saw a reconstitution or a reconstruction in France?

Your statement is just bullshit.  The words don't even mean the same thing.

And No One in French Law is obliged to do this.

This was a bad one, Sweetie.  Pick another European Country.

Offline Carana

Re: Why now?
« Reply #549 on: December 03, 2021, 07:48:19 PM »
In Portugal as in France;

In French criminal law, the reconstitution is a reconstruction of all or part of a crime involving the accused and/or witnesses and takes place at the scene of the crime.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10439463.2013.784294

What's the equivalent term in Anglophone countries that don't involve public appeals?


Offline G-Unit

Re: Why now?
« Reply #550 on: December 03, 2021, 08:15:19 PM »
And you know nothing of French Criminal Law.  When was the last time you saw a reconstitution or a reconstruction in France?

Your statement is just bullshit.  The words don't even mean the same thing.

And No One in French Law is obliged to do this.

This was a bad one, Sweetie.  Pick another European Country.

I think you'll find you are wrong.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Why now?
« Reply #551 on: December 03, 2021, 08:47:01 PM »
I think you'll find you are wrong.

Prove it.  Give me such a case.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why now?
« Reply #552 on: December 03, 2021, 09:07:55 PM »
Prove it.  Give me such a case.

No. I already provided a cite.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Carana

Re: Why now?
« Reply #553 on: December 03, 2021, 09:09:07 PM »
In Portugal as in France;

In French criminal law, the reconstitution is a reconstruction of all or part of a crime involving the accused and/or witnesses and takes place at the scene of the crime.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10439463.2013.784294

I'm aware of that, but why call it a "reconstitution" in English? lol

Offline Eleanor

Re: Why now?
« Reply #554 on: December 03, 2021, 09:11:08 PM »
I think you'll find you are wrong.

What are you trying to do?  Another Country?  Somewhere  else now.  I see.

Just push it off somewhat elsewhere