Feasibility Of Disposing Of A Small Child's Body In The PDL Area

[Brietta]

Then you'll accept Despite Briettas intervention then, that speculation involving disposal is entitled.

There is no rational explanation of why you have twisted my ... "May I remind members that no-one has yet come up with intelligence or proof that Madeleine McCann died in Luz if she is dead at all, let alone speculating on the feasibility of her burial there." into your ... " ... that speculation involving disposal is entitled".

• In the first instance ... do not paraphrase my posts into a perversion of what I said
• In the second instance ... I am very obviously not the arbitrator of what can and cannot be posted on the forum ... that is for members to decide for themselves

[Eleanor]

There is no rational explanation of why you have twisted my ... "May I remind members that no-one has yet come up with intelligence or proof that Madeleine McCann died in Luz if she is dead at all, let alone speculating on the feasibility of her burial there." into your ... " ... that speculation involving disposal is entitled".

• In the first instance ... do not paraphrase my posts into a perversion of what I said
• In the second instance ... I am very obviously not the arbitrator of what can and cannot be posted on the forum ... that is for members to decide for themselves

Bearing in mind the possibility of Libel, of course.

[Brietta]

Bearing in mind the possibility of Libel, of course.

Absolutely ... and with any other obvious breach of forum rules.  What I think are mean spirited posts are just a fact of life to be lived with I suppose.

[John]

The feasibility of Madeleine being buried in Praia da Luz was tested to its utmost and beyond by Amaral: he proved it was unfeasible for any but someone with the appropriate local knowledge and resources to achieve the feasibility asked for in the title of the thread.

I agree to the extent that if someone did hide Madeleine's body somewhere in the Praia da Luz area they would require to have some basic local knowledge and most certainly some form of transport.

[pathfinder73]

"It is possible a small child could be secreted amongst the rocks in natural voids."

"Therefore if someone deposited a body into the sea, on the night of M McCann's disappearance, from the beach the optimum time window for full access to the whole beach and rocky outcrop was between 2200hrs and 0200hrs. This time window would also be the optimum time for burial in the sand, not withstanding the digability study limitations previously described."

Smithman was spotted at around 2200 heading towards the beach/sea so the best time for full access according to Mark Harrison.

Low tide was at 2200 on 3 May 2007 therefore any search should be done at low tide on the rocky areas.

[barrier]

I agree to the extent that if someone did hide Madeleine's body somewhere in the Praia da Luz area they would require to have some basic local knowledge and most certainly some form of transport.

Now you know the reason for OG's digs,just because they didn't find a body where they dug doesn't mean to say there isn't one.

[barrier]

Did Brietta say it wasn't.  Although entitled is a bit strong in my opinion.

The battle fields of Europe are scattered with the remains of the brave who gave their all,you're right its not an entitlement,the right of the right of entitlement of opinion was fought for.

[Venturi Swirl]

Now you know the reason for OG's digs,just because they didn't find a body where they dug doesn't mean to say there isn't one.

And just because they apparently didn’t find physical evidence of an abductor doesn’t mean to say there wasn’t one.

[jassi]

And just because they apparently didn’t find physical evidence of an abductor doesn’t mean to say there wasn’t one.

Of course, but without evidence they can't move forward on that front, whereas they could extend a dig area.

[G-Unit]

And just because they apparently didn’t find physical evidence of an abductor doesn’t mean to say there wasn’t one.

On the other hand the lack of such evidence makes A C Rowley's comments in 2017 about abduction astonishing. Pedro do Carmo's comments that all options must be considered were much more reasonable imo.

[barrier]

On the other hand the lack of such evidence makes A C Rowley's comments in 2017 about abduction astonishing. Pedro do Carmo's comments that all options must be considered were much more reasonable imo.

It'll be an interesting read once its shut in 2022.

[Brietta]

The battle fields of Europe are scattered with the remains of the brave who gave their all,you're right its not an entitlement,the right of the right of entitlement of opinion was fought for.

Is there the slightest possibility you could exercise your 'entitlement' by sticking to the thread topic please.  TY

[Venturi Swirl]

On the other hand the lack of such evidence makes A C Rowley's comments in 2017 about abduction astonishing. Pedro do Carmo's comments that all options must be considered were much more reasonable imo.

And just what is de Camo and his team doing?  Still sitting on their arses “considering options”?  At least the Met attempted to get answers by putting boots on the ground.  And note I used the word “apparently “ - we actually don’t know what evidence may have come to light since the investigation was re-opened that supports the abduction theory.

[Brietta]

It'll be an interesting read once its shut in 2022.

Topic please.

[Mr Gray]

On the other hand the lack of such evidence makes A C Rowley's comments in 2017 about abduction astonishing. Pedro do Carmo's comments that all options must be considered were much more reasonable imo.

Do Carmo also said the McCann's are not suspects and there's no evidence against them... Or do you just wish to cherry pick the points that suit you and ignore those that dont